On 8 May 2013 18:21, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I have a quick question can the development boards be used in production
> environments?
>
Depends on what you consider "production" environment. I have a couple of
"production" buildbots using Pandas which is
I have a quick question can the development boards be used in production
environments?
--
Jonathan Aquilina
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
have any plans to support this platform.
Linaro usually provides hardware packs for members boards.
> Any links or guides on building a new HW pack would be helpful.
It's relatively easy to create a new hwpack:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/AddingNewHardwareSupport
https://w
Hi All,
I am new to Linaro HWPacks.
I would like to know if there is a HW Pack for ZYNQ ZC702 board like the
ones for PandaBoard and Gumsticks.
Is there nay plans on supporting this platform ?
Any links or guides on building a new HW pack would be helpful.
--
*Anup Kini
*Systems Engineer
all of these will live in
> > the central location of the config-boards-tracking branch of
> > git://git.linaro.org/kernel/configs.git ?
> >
>
> Fine with me as long as the basic board config gets pulled into llct. I
> will post the Origen patch today.
Andrey, shall I'l
nablement config fragments should always go in
>>> with the respective topic branches.
>>
>> I agree.
>
> OK, can we do it then? We're freezing for release today, but it's not
> a big change, so we can get it in, right?
>
> At some point in the past, And
The new board enablement config fragments should always go in
>>> with the respective topic branches.
>>
>> I agree.
>
> Of course, this can't be done until Linaro's CI jobs and Ubuntu kernel
> packaging jobs support multiple config fragments, so fo
On 15 November 2012 12:38, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On 11/15/2012 04:01 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>> OK, can we do it then? We're freezing for release today,
>
>
> Are we?
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1211/Release/Calendar?highlight=%28release%29|%2812.11%29
Doh!
Looks like I'm a week early..
naro.org/Cycles/1211/Release/Calendar?highlight=%28release%29|%2812.11%29
but it's not
a big change, so we can get it in, right?
At some point in the past, Andrey asked:
My question is if this topic branch would be kernel/configs.git,
Sounds perfect
config-boards-tracking branch or somethin
gt; > > should be able to live with that process.
> > >
> >
> > I suppose we are talking about the basic board config here. That should
> > be ok. The new board enablement config fragments should always go in
> > with the respective topic branches.
>
&g
suitable .conf or defconfig for vexpress at
all. That's the problem (wrt the ci jobs).
The easier way seemed to be a single kernel/configs.git,
config-boards-tracking branch to provide the config fragments for all
the llct jobs.
But it creates several instances of the same .conf files and adds
conf
o live with that process.
>> >
>>
>> I suppose we are talking about the basic board config here. That should
>> be ok. The new board enablement config fragments should always go in
>> with the respective topic branches.
>
> I agree.
OK, can we do it then? We
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 09:20 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
> On 11/14/2012 07:41 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> > On 14 November 2012 11:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
[...]
> >> Now that the LT branches included in linux-linaro (ll) are based on
> >> llct, then they could modify the board configs in llct
efconfig for vexpress at
>>> all. That's the problem (wrt the ci jobs).
>>>
>>> The easier way seemed to be a single kernel/configs.git,
>>> config-boards-tracking branch to provide the config fragments for all
>>> the llct jobs.
>>> But
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 20:30 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On 11/14/2012 08:12 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 19:06 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> >
> Or course, once Linaro's build and test infrastructure supports config
> fragments fully, then we could have
On 11/14/2012 08:12 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 19:06 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Or course, once Linaro's build and test infrastructure supports config
fragments fully, then we could have have separate config fragments for
- basic board config
- new board enablement
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 19:06 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> >> Or course, once Linaro's build and test infrastructure supports config
> >> fragments fully, then we could have have separate config fragments for
> >> - basic board config
> >> - new board enablement
>
> Not sure if I follow this 10
. That's the problem (wrt the ci jobs).
The easier way seemed to be a single kernel/configs.git,
config-boards-tracking branch to provide the config fragments for all
the llct jobs.
But it creates several instances of the same .conf files and adds
confusion. Agreed.
Should we do in the jenkins
roblem (wrt the ci jobs).
>>
>> The easier way seemed to be a single kernel/configs.git,
>> config-boards-tracking branch to provide the config fragments for all
>> the llct jobs.
>> But it creates several instances of the same .conf files and adds
>> confusion. Agre
ernel/configs.git,
> config-boards-tracking branch to provide the config fragments for all
> the llct jobs.
> But it creates several instances of the same .conf files and adds
> confusion. Agreed.
> Should we do in the jenkins jobs something like 'git checkout
> arm_lt/in
On 03/16/2012 05:20 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 16 March 2012 04:14, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 15/03/2012, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>>> On 14 March 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>&g
On 03/16/2012 03:35 PM, Sangwook Lee wrote:
> On 16 March 2012 14:55, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>
>> On 16 March 2012 12:36, Sangwook Lee wrote:
>>> Hi Mans
>>>
>>> On 16 March 2012 11:50, Mans Rullgard wrote:
On 16 March 2012 04:14, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/03/2012
> >> > On 15/03/2012, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> >> >> On 14 March 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann
> >> >>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> Hi,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I am currently playing with a couple of the
ch 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann
>> >>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> I am currently playing with a couple of the development boards for
>> >>> which
>> >>> there are Linaro hwpacks and LEBs. Since what I
te:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am currently playing with a couple of the development boards for
> which
> >>> there are Linaro hwpacks and LEBs. Since what I am trying to do
> requires
> >>> a lot of disk and network I/O, I've been
On 16 March 2012 04:14, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/03/2012, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> On 14 March 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am currently playing with a couple of the development boards for which
>>>
On 16 March 2012 04:14, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/03/2012, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> > On 14 March 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann >
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am currently playing with a couple of the development boards for which
>
Hi,
On 15/03/2012, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 14 March 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am currently playing with a couple of the development boards for which
>> there are Linaro hwpacks and LEBs. Since what I am trying to do requires
>>
Hey,
On 03/15/2012 01:26 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 14 March 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann
> wrote:
>> 3) Origen
>>
>> * the internal USB hub runs at Full Speed (12 MBit/s), resulting in a
>>maximum USB disk I/O of 1.5 MByte/s
>>
>> * since the board does not feature Ethernet itself, I tr
On 14 March 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently playing with a couple of the development boards for which
> there are Linaro hwpacks and LEBs. Since what I am trying to do requires
> a lot of disk and network I/O, I've been paying special attention to
W dniu 15.03.2012 11:31, Jassi Brar pisze:
> Cool. You might also want to take a look at 'netperf', a small yet
> powerful tool.
Or iperf which I use for bandwidth tests.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/
On 15 March 2012 15:39, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 03/15/2012 01:39 AM, Tony Mansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is interesting. I'd like to reproduce the Ethernet speed tests.
>>
>> Do you have the exact command lines?
>
> Sure. You'll need two machines, on being the board. Both need to be
n run it
as often if you want to make it more reliable.
Hope that helps,
Jannis
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Jannis Pohlmann
> Date: 14 March 2012 21:04
> Subject: Slow/broken USB and Ethernet on Snowballs/Origen boards?
> To: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
&g
Hi,
I am currently playing with a couple of the development boards for which
there are Linaro hwpacks and LEBs. Since what I am trying to do requires
a lot of disk and network I/O, I've been paying special attention to the
data transfer rates I can get out of these boards.
Below is a
NOS4 macro to exynos4
>> based boards i.e. Origen, smdkv310 and s5pc210_universal.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
>> ---
>> include/configs/origen.h | 1 +
>> include/configs/s5pc210_universal.h | 1 +
>> include/configs/smdkv310.h
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 22 December 2011 19:52, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Exynos architecture has varients like exynos4 and exynos5. In order to
> identify the exynos4 architecture, add CONFIG_EXYNOS4 macro to exynos4
> based boards i.e. Origen, smdkv310 and s5pc210_universal.
>
>
Exynos architecture has varients like exynos4 and exynos5. In order to
identify the exynos4 architecture, add CONFIG_EXYNOS4 macro to exynos4
based boards i.e. Origen, smdkv310 and s5pc210_universal.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
include/configs/origen.h|1 +
include
have those tests in the test pool before end of December.
LAVA is the validation *infrastructure* to automatically deploy Linux
images to Linaro supported development boards, run tests on them, and
collect the results into a human readable dashboard system. For the actual
tests, we *strongly* encour
: Friday, December 09, 2011 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Samsung] Origen boards in Lava
Great work getting this up and running Dave, and thanks to Sangwook for his
support in helping us sort out issues with usb ethernet dongles. I'm doing
some smoke testing on the boards right now in preparatio
Hi,
linaro-android-media-create --dev option is now using "mx53loco" parameter for
i.MX53 boards. This changes is available on the bzr repository and will be part
of 2011.10 release. Please, update your scripts that are using the deprecated
"iMX53" value.
Cheers,
--
Fathi B
On 19 August 2011 19:29, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
> wrote:
>> This adds a function to get the revision id.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaecheol Lee
>> Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpu.c | 10 ++
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Amit Daniel Kachhap
wrote:
> This adds a function to get the revision id.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaecheol Lee
> Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpu.c | 10 ++
> arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/exynos4.h | 1 +
>
This adds a function to get the revision id.
Signed-off-by: Jaecheol Lee
Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpu.c | 10 ++
arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/exynos4.h |1 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Guilherme Salgado
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 08:26 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Guilherme Salgado
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Michael,
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 03:12 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 AM,
Hey
This is not a specific use case, but more of a proposed design feature:
Linaro might sometimes offer the possibility to run/build something on
boards to untrusted third parties. For instance building a package,
running a testsuite, or doing a test build of a proposed GCC branch
I think the email thread crossed at some point. Anyway the user story could be:
As a developer I want a target that I can interactively control and
see graphical/video output and hear audio output, so that I can
develop multimedia features.
-Zach
On 4 May 2011 16:02, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
>
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 15:49 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Hmm... I took a look at:
>
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Specs/RemoteDevelopmentBoards
>
> ..and there nothing about multimedia live debug.
I meant the bit about live debug and development, which is what you
mentioned i
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 08:26 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 03:12 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> >> wrote:
> >> > If you do, I need to know mo
Hmm... I took a look at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Specs/RemoteDevelopmentBoards
..and there nothing about multimedia live debug.
-Zach
On 4 May 2011 15:43, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 15:32 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> Hmm...actually I was thinking
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 15:32 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Hmm...actually I was thinking a little more interactive and less
> batch. Having a remote system that I could do live debug and
> development one.
That's one of the user stories on the wiki page.
>
> On 4 May 2011 15:26, Michael Hope wrot
Hmm...actually I was thinking a little more interactive and less
batch. Having a remote system that I could do live debug and
development one.
On 4 May 2011 15:26, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 03:12 +1
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Guilherme Salgado
wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 03:12 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Guilherme Salgado
>> wrote:
>> > If you do, I need to know more about how you'd like to use them, to make
>> > sure we provide somet
I've got another user story.
As an developer using a remote target to debug I would like to be able
to 'see' the video out and hear the audio.
On 4 May 2011 15:15, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 03:12 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 AM,
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 03:12 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > If you do, I need to know more about how you'd like to use them, to make
> > sure we provide something that is suitable to everyone.
> >
> > At this point I'm intere
ubscribe to the blueprint[2] on Launchpad.
>
> Cheers,
>
> [1]
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Specs/RemoteDevelopmentBoards
> [2]
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava/+spec/linaro-platforms-o-remote-developent-boa
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Guilherme Salgado
wrote:
> If you do, I need to know more about how you'd like to use them, to make
> sure we provide something that is suitable to everyone.
>
> At this point I'm interested in drafting some user stories so if you
> have any, please do add them to t
'd like to participate in the discussion at LDS, don't
forget to subscribe to the blueprint[2] on Launchpad.
Cheers,
[1]
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Specs/RemoteDevelopmentBoards
[2]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava/+spec/linaro-platforms-o-remote-developent-b
Stephen Warren wrote at Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 7:52 PM:
> To: Grant Likely
> Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; linux-te...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: Tegra: dt: Fix machine desc to match other
> boards.
>
> Grant Likely wrote at Friday, April 29, 2011 5
Grant Likely wrote at Friday, April 29, 2011 5:35 PM:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:30:03PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > The content of the machine descriptions has be re-organized. Without fixing
> > the board-dt.c copy, the system will fail to boot (BUG_ON during timer
> > initialization, whic
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:30:03PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> The content of the machine descriptions has be re-organized. Without fixing
> the board-dt.c copy, the system will fail to boot (BUG_ON during timer
> initialization, which happens before printk is operational, leading to a
> silent
On 28/04/11 09:01, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Dnia 2011-04-27, śro o godzinie 17:45 +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan pisze:
Please note that the cmdline I have at the minute has the following line :
mem=456M@0x8000 mem=512M@0xA000
Thus I would expect there to be atleast 968M of RAM rathe
On 28/04/11 09:01, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Dnia 2011-04-27, śro o godzinie 17:45 +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan pisze:
Please note that the cmdline I have at the minute has the following line :
mem=456M@0x8000 mem=512M@0xA000
Thus I would expect there to be atleast 968M of RAM rathe
Dnia 2011-04-27, śro o godzinie 17:45 +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan pisze:
> Please note that the cmdline I have at the minute has the following line :
>
> mem=456M@0x8000 mem=512M@0xA000
>
> Thus I would expect there to be atleast 968M of RAM rather than just 662M !
hrw@panda:~$ cat /
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools/+bug/707047
This bug has been marked "fix released" for linaro-image-tools, but there
has not been an update of linaro-image-tools in Ubuntu natty since February.
If you use linaro-media-create from the bzr branch when writing to the SD
card, you s
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:28:35PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ti-omap4/+bug/633227
> seems to suggest we can now use 1GB of RAM on a Panda board.
> Creating a new image using the following images and hwpacks for my Panda :
> BOARD=panda
Hi,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ti-omap4/+bug/633227
seems to suggest we can now use 1GB of RAM on a Panda board.
Creating a new image using the following images and hwpacks for my Panda :
BOARD=panda linaro-media-create --rootfs ext4 --mmc /dev/mmcblk1
--binary linaro-n-d
The content of the machine descriptions has be re-organized. Without fixing
the board-dt.c copy, the system will fail to boot (BUG_ON during timer
initialization, which happens before printk is operational, leading to a
silent hang early during kernel boot). Solve this basiclaly by copying the
exis
Hi Kurt,
Here is the output from Samsung Orion board:
Ubuntu Natty (development branch) (GNU/Linux 2.6.38-1000-s5pv310 armv7l)
Machine: SMDKV310
ALSA device list:
#0: SMDK-I2S
# pacmd list-sinks
Welcome to PulseAudio! Use "help" for usage information.
>>> 1 sink(s) available.
* index: 0
If you haven't previously set the user's client.conf to turn autospawn off
then try running-> pulseaudio --daemonize
That should do the trick, thanks!
On 3 April 2011 09:45, Matt Sealey wrote:
> I'm trying to get this data from the Smarttop to show the SPDIF device
> but I get the same "No Pul
I'm trying to get this data from the Smarttop to show the SPDIF device
but I get the same "No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as
session daemon." as Shawn.. under exactly the same operating system as
Jason..
Is there a special place I need to be running this, in a certain
shell? All I ca
Hi, Kurt,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Kurt Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am trying to assemble a reference for the sound device specifics for all
> the platforms. The catch is that I don't have all the dev platforms
> available to me.
>
> Here is where you can help! I have Panda and Be
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:20:49AM -0500, Kurt Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
Hi Kurt,
> I am trying to assemble a reference for the sound device specifics for all
> the platforms. The catch is that I don't have all the dev platforms
> available to me.
>
> Here is where you can help! I have Pan
Hi everyone,
I am trying to assemble a reference for the sound device specifics for all
the platforms. The catch is that I don't have all the dev platforms
available to me.
Here is where you can help! I have Panda and Beagle C4. I need everything
else. If you have access to other platform(s), p
From: Richard Zhu
Some cards have the CRC errors in read on mx51 BBG board.
Configure the eSDHC pad configurations to level up the
compatibility to fix this issue.
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu
Tested-by: Shawn Guo
---
arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-mx51.h | 40 +-
>From f7f406cc3e6e3c477c5457b0fec00dad60568815 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrik Ryd
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:38:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Trigger build of tarballs for Linaro boards.
---
tasks/tarballs.mk | 22 ++
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deleti
I'm investigating the powerdebug tool on all platforms for which there
is a Linaro image.
Can anyone with boards imx51, lt-s5pv310, overo and vexpress provide
access for a short period of time?
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linar
We should try this in the Linaro Cambridge office...
Dave
On 31 Jan 2011, at 11:47, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
>> My office was getting a bit messy so I re-purposed an old PC case and
>> mounted my ARM boards, a switch, and far
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
> My office was getting a bit messy so I re-purposed an old PC case and
> mounted my ARM boards, a switch, and far too many power supplies into
> it:
> http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/racked/IMG_20110131_145444.jpg
Neat. Bu
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
> Neat, did you use anything to secure the pandas and beagles in the drive
> bays? or are they just sitting there? I was thinking it might be neat to
> built a frame that would mount to the standard holes in a case for an atx
> board, but provi
PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> My office was getting a bit messy so I re-purposed an old PC case and
> mounted my ARM boards, a switch, and far too many power supplies into
> it:
>
> http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/racked/IMG_20110131_145444.jpg<http://people.linaro.org/
My office was getting a bit messy so I re-purposed an old PC case and
mounted my ARM boards, a switch, and far too many power supplies into
it:
http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/racked/IMG_20110131_145444.jpg
The Stagecoach board goes where the motherboard used to:
http://people.linaro.org
I've now got a Gumstix Stagecoach with six NFS root OMAP3-based boards
up and running in my office. That brings the grand total up to ten
Cortex-A8 based boards on the local network.
Eventually these or something similar will go up into the data centre
but, until then, I might as well put
82 matches
Mail list logo
