On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 09:20 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > On 11/14/2012 07:41 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote: > > On 14 November 2012 11:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote: [...] > >> Now that the LT branches included in linux-linaro (ll) are based on > >> llct, then they could modify the board configs in llct if required for > >> the work in their topics. So at the moment, I can't think of a good > >> reason not to pub all the board configs into llct. Can anyone else? > >> > >> I don't know if we need the board configs to be sourced from a single > >> repo, or allow board configs to be included in llct from LT trees. One > >> central repo means that people know where to go > > > > This seems like the easiest option to me. Let's do it this way unless > > someone gives a valid objection. > > > >> (Unless we had > >> an official maintainer to manage all commits to the tree.) > > > > I assume this would have to be Andrey. Andrey, are you OK with that? > > Or does someone else need to do it? > > > > Each LT that is using LLCT would have to send a patch to get their > > config updated. So long as this happens in a timely manner, LTs > > should be able to live with that process. > > > > I suppose we are talking about the basic board config here. That should > be ok. The new board enablement config fragments should always go in > with the respective topic branches.
I agree. -- Tixy _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
