On 16 March 2012 12:36, Sangwook Lee <sangwook....@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Mans > > On 16 March 2012 11:50, Mans Rullgard <mans.rullg...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On 16 March 2012 04:14, Sachin Kamat <sachin.ka...@linaro.org> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On 15/03/2012, Mans Rullgard <mans.rullg...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On 14 March 2012 20:04, Jannis Pohlmann >> >> <jannis.pohlm...@codethink.co.uk> >> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> I am currently playing with a couple of the development boards for >> >>> which >> >>> there are Linaro hwpacks and LEBs. Since what I am trying to do >> >>> requires >> >>> a lot of disk and network I/O, I've been paying special attention to >> >>> the >> >>> data transfer rates I can get out of these boards. >> >>> >> >>> Below is a brief summary of my findings. >> >>> >> >>> 3) Origen >> >>> >> >>> * the internal USB hub runs at Full Speed (12 MBit/s), resulting in a >> >>> maximum USB disk I/O of 1.5 MByte/s >> >>> >> >>> * since the board does not feature Ethernet itself, I tried to attach >> >>> a USB Ethernet controller to it, but of course the transfer rate >> >>> through that is by the I/O upper limit of the USB hub >> >>> >> >>> * I did not test wireless but it is not feasible for what I am trying >> >>> to do anyway >> >> >> >> Which kernel version are you using on the Origen? I noticed the same >> >> problem >> >> a while back, but it appears to have been fixed in the Samsung landing >> >> team >> >> tree. There is still another bug present in the Origen kernel >> >> preventing >> >> USB-ethernet working with EHCI. Some patches have been posted, but >> >> they >> >> have not made it into the trees yet. >> > >> > These patches have been added to Samsung LT tree [1]. >> > >> > [1] git://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/samsung/kernel.git >> > (branch: tracking) >> >> That branch still needs one more patch (attached). >> > Thanks for looking at this git. > > Initially I submitted patches with the call-back function > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg59212.html > > But maintainers don't like to use call-back function, and it was rejected. > So Now LT doesn't to use this call-back function
Yes, I saw that, but the tracking branch in git still has the incomplete callback version. -- Mans Rullgard / mru _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
