On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 20:30 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > On 11/14/2012 08:12 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 19:06 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > > > >>>> Or course, once Linaro's build and test infrastructure supports config > >>>> fragments fully, then we could have have separate config fragments for > >>>> - basic board config > >>>> - new board enablement > >> > >> Not sure if I follow this 100%... Can I have an example of "new board > >> enablement" vs "basic board config" config fragment? > > > > I guess "basic board config" == config for features in Linus Torvald's > > tree. "new board enablement" == config for things only in LT tree. For > > us that's TC2 power managemnt and various drivers. Probably, most of the > > time the config for this extra stuff in LT trees is harmless (i.e. just > > gives KConfig warnings) but I imagine there might be things which would > > break llct. > > This makes sense. I see. > The "new board enablement" is not for the "board configs" topic for llct > then.
It's not. -- Tixy _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
