On 11/15/2012 05:31 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote: > On 15 November 2012 11:37, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 09:20 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: >>> On 11/14/2012 07:41 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote: >>>> On 14 November 2012 11:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote: >> [...] >>>>> Now that the LT branches included in linux-linaro (ll) are based on >>>>> llct, then they could modify the board configs in llct if required for >>>>> the work in their topics. So at the moment, I can't think of a good >>>>> reason not to pub all the board configs into llct. Can anyone else? >>>>> >>>>> I don't know if we need the board configs to be sourced from a single >>>>> repo, or allow board configs to be included in llct from LT trees. One >>>>> central repo means that people know where to go >>>> >>>> This seems like the easiest option to me. Let's do it this way unless >>>> someone gives a valid objection. >>>> >>>>> (Unless we had >>>>> an official maintainer to manage all commits to the tree.) >>>> >>>> I assume this would have to be Andrey. Andrey, are you OK with that? >>>> Or does someone else need to do it? >>>> >>>> Each LT that is using LLCT would have to send a patch to get their >>>> config updated. So long as this happens in a timely manner, LTs >>>> should be able to live with that process. >>>> >>> >>> I suppose we are talking about the basic board config here. That should >>> be ok. The new board enablement config fragments should always go in >>> with the respective topic branches. >> >> I agree. > > OK, can we do it then? We're freezing for release today, but it's not > a big change, so we can get it in, right? > > At some point in the past, Andrey asked: >> My question is if this topic branch would be kernel/configs.git, > > Sounds perfect > > >> config-boards-tracking branch or something else? > > I don't have an opinion. We'll probably have to live with it for a > long time, but as long as it looks sensible, I'm sure people will be > ok... >
config-boards-tracking branch already has got config fragment for Origen board, but this config file has enabled all the config options used in all the topic branches too. If we plan to keep it that way, I suggest to add the basic board config file to config-core-tracking. (It makes sense as we would be enabling only mainline components that is essential to boot the board). Any further modification to these can always be done through LT topic branches. Andrey, let me know which way you would prefer the patch? -- Tushar Behera _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
