On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 11:37 +0000, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 09:20 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > > On 11/14/2012 07:41 PM, Ryan Harkin wrote: > > > On 14 November 2012 11:38, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote: > [...] > > >> Now that the LT branches included in linux-linaro (ll) are based on > > >> llct, then they could modify the board configs in llct if required for > > >> the work in their topics. So at the moment, I can't think of a good > > >> reason not to pub all the board configs into llct. Can anyone else? > > >> > > >> I don't know if we need the board configs to be sourced from a single > > >> repo, or allow board configs to be included in llct from LT trees. One > > >> central repo means that people know where to go > > > > > > This seems like the easiest option to me. Let's do it this way unless > > > someone gives a valid objection. > > > > > >> (Unless we had > > >> an official maintainer to manage all commits to the tree.) > > > > > > I assume this would have to be Andrey. Andrey, are you OK with that? > > > Or does someone else need to do it? > > > > > > Each LT that is using LLCT would have to send a patch to get their > > > config updated. So long as this happens in a timely manner, LTs > > > should be able to live with that process. > > > > > > > I suppose we are talking about the basic board config here. That should > > be ok. The new board enablement config fragments should always go in > > with the respective topic branches. > > I agree.
Of course, this can't be done until Linaro's CI jobs and Ubuntu kernel packaging jobs support multiple config fragments, so for now we're stuck with one config per board. Shall we agree that all of these will live in the central location of the config-boards-tracking branch of git://git.linaro.org/kernel/configs.git ? -- Tixy _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
