On 11/14/2012 08:12 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 19:06 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Or course, once Linaro's build and test infrastructure supports config
fragments fully, then we could have have separate config fragments for
- basic board config
- new board enablement
Not sure if I follow this 100%... Can I have an example of "new board
enablement" vs "basic board config" config fragment?
I guess "basic board config" == config for features in Linus Torvald's
tree. "new board enablement" == config for things only in LT tree. For
us that's TC2 power managemnt and various drivers. Probably, most of the
time the config for this extra stuff in LT trees is harmless (i.e. just
gives KConfig warnings) but I imagine there might be things which would
break llct.
This makes sense. I see.
The "new board enablement" is not for the "board configs" topic for llct
then.
Thanks,
Andrey
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
