Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

ngExceptions setting, I find that these are now beamed as | [c c c] r | and | r [c c c] |.  I would perhaps, though, want them to appear as | [c c] c r | and | r c c[ c] | (i.e. without a beam crossing the middle of the bar). Is there a way to get this result with automatic beaming and still keep my new [c c c c] beaming, or would it have to be done with manual beams?   David Sumbler

Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

t be included in the setting. It is not possible to add, remove, or change only one of the exceptions. While this may seem cumbersome, it means that the current beaming settings need not be known in order to specify a new beaming pattern. And in the section "How automatic beaming works&qu

Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

David Sumbler writes: > What I don't understand is why I need both the 8th-note and 16th-note > entries.  The name "beamExceptions" implies that one only needs to > specify the exceptional beaming - but the 16th note version is already > the default.  Is it the case that if any exception is descr

Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 15:25 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > David Sumbler writes: > > > I am setting a piece in 2/4 time.  Lilypond's default beaming > > pattern > > is to break beams at the mid-bar point, which is what one would > > generally expect.  However, I would like it to use a single beam

Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

David Sumbler writes: > I am setting a piece in 2/4 time.  Lilypond's default beaming pattern > is to break beams at the mid-bar point, which is what one would > generally expect.  However, I would like it to use a single beam for > the whole bar if, and only if, the bar consists of 4 quavers/hal

Re: Automatic beaming behaviour

On 24/11/2024 13:50, David Sumbler wrote: \version "2.24.3" \language "english" \new Staff \relative {   \time 2/4   \set Timing.baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/4)   \set Timing.beatStructure = 1,1   \set Timing.beamExceptions = #'()   \set Timing.beamExceptions = \beamExceptions { 8[ 8 8 8] } c

Automatic beaming behaviour

I am setting a piece in 2/4 time.  Lilypond's default beaming pattern is to break beams at the mid-bar point, which is what one would generally expect.  However, I would like it to use a single beam for the whole bar if, and only if, the bar consists of 4 quavers/half- notes. Of course I can easil

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

-- Forwarded message -- >> From: David Kastrup >> To: Kieren MacMillan >> Cc: foxfanfare , Lilypond-User Mailing List < >> lilypond-user@gnu.org> >> Bcc: >> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:33:07 +0200 >> Subject: Re: Automatic beaming with rest &g

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

> -- Forwarded message -- > From: David Kastrup > To: Kieren MacMillan > Cc: foxfanfare , Lilypond-User Mailing List < > lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:33:07 +0200 > Subject: Re: Automatic beaming with rest > Ki

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Hi Carl, > I think that if we can get smarter autobeaming (like we need to do to get > subdivision and tuplets done right) we can do beaming over rests. Probably > we need to do a two-pass beam check to get the autobeaming right for > subdivision, and if we do two-pass, we can beam over rests.

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

On 4/2/19, 9:41 AM, "Kieren MacMillan" wrote: >Hi David, >> What is the "beat" as defined for the beam? > Perhaps I should use the word "moment"… Example: In 3/4, one can set the autobeamer to beam sub-quarter notes as 3, or 2+1, or 1+2, or 1+1+1 (or even other options,

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Hi David, > What is the "beat" as defined for the beam? Perhaps I should use the word "moment"… Example: In 3/4, one can set the autobeamer to beam sub-quarter notes as 3, or 2+1, or 1+2, or 1+1+1 (or even other options, I suppose). The moment an auto-beam encompasses (as a result of the curre

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Hi David, > So if we have > { \time 4/4 c'8 r4 c'8 8 8 8 8 } > will there be a beam across r4? Would there be a beam across c'8 c'4 c'8 ? If yes, then yes; if no, then no. > What if we have r8 r8 instead? Would there be a beam across c'8 c'8 c'8 c'8 ? If yes, then yes; if no, then no.

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Kieren MacMillan writes: > p.s. > > Before you ask: Yes, it would be great to include the option/parameter > to extend across *all* rests that fall within the "beat" as defined > for the beam, What is the "beat" as defined for the beam? > even if they fall outside the compass of the two "bounda

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi David, > >> So if you have a bar containing only rests, the autobeamer places > beams over them? > > LOL > Sure, we can play this game… It's not a game to work out specs. It's not optional. Computers don't do handwaving. > An automatic beam must start from a note

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Hi there, > I don't think it's quite that simple as rests that begin or end beam groups > wouldn't have beams over them, only ones in the middle. Not strictly true: in modern scores, the beam could easily extend over those rests (especially if stemlets are used). We just need to give the user

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

p.s. Before you ask: Yes, it would be great to include the option/parameter to extend across *all* rests that fall within the "beat" as defined for the beam, even if they fall outside the compass of the two "boundary notes" for the auto beam. Kieren. Kieren Ma

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

On 2019-04-02 11:05 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: The auto-beamer should beam according to the settings that it would apply if there were no rests. I don't think it's quite that simple as rests that begin or end beam groups wouldn't have beams over them, only ones in the middle. It might be m

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Hi David, > So if you have a bar containing only rests, the autobeamer places beams over > them? LOL Sure, we can play this game… An automatic beam must start from a note and end at a second note. Cheers, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kiere

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi David, > >> It is not clear what that option would be supposed to do when. > > The auto-beamer should beam according to the settings that it would > apply if there were no rests. > > Seems perfectly clear to me… but maybe that’s because I want the feature. =) So if

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Hi David, > It is not clear what that option would be supposed to do when. The auto-beamer should beam according to the settings that it would apply if there were no rests. Seems perfectly clear to me… but maybe that’s because I want the feature. =) Cheers, Kieren. ___

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hey there, > >> But in my case, it is a typical engraving rule and I was wondering if I >> wasn't missing a little option like >> \set BeamOverRest = ##t > > I would love that option. Maybe submit it as a formal request? Too much handwaving. It is not clear what tha

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Hey there, > But in my case, it is a typical engraving rule and I was wondering if I > wasn't missing a little option like > \set BeamOverRest = ##t I would love that option. Maybe submit it as a formal request? Cheers, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ web

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Kieren MacMillan wrote > The documentation explicitly says “the autobeamer will not put beams over > rests or bar lines” > (;). > I hope someone [with real Scheme-fu] offers you a function/callback/hack > that will do it autom

Re: Automatic beaming with rest

Hi there! > is there a way to make the second line of my example to look like my > third line without writing manually the brackets each time? The documentation explicitly says “the autobeamer will not put beams over rests or bar lines” (

Automatic beaming with rest

Hi all, I have a score to write with a lot of beaming upon rests. Here is a short example: \relative c' { c8 c c c c c c c c r c r c r c r c[ r c] r c[ r c] r } By default LP make the beam duration of a half note in 4/4. But is there a way to make the second line of my example to look lik

Re: automatic beaming of tuplets only - is this possible ?

"Christopher R. Maden" writes: > On 11/21/2017 09:57 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >> "The repos" for what distribution? 2.18.0 was released in December >> 2013. What repos carry software that has been replaced 4 years ago? > > Distros released 4 years ago, like Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Trusty, supported >

Re: automatic beaming of tuplets only - is this possible ?

On 11/21/2017 09:57 AM, David Kastrup wrote: "The repos" for what distribution? 2.18.0 was released in December 2013. What repos carry software that has been replaced 4 years ago? Distros released 4 years ago, like Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Trusty, supported through April 2019) and its derivatives,

Re: automatic beaming of tuplets only - is this possible ?

Eby Mani writes: > Many thanks Urs. > > 2.16.2 is what is available on the repos, thus sticking to. "The repos" for what distribution? 2.18.0 was released in December 2013. What repos carry software that has been replaced 4 years ago? -- David Kastrup ___

Re: automatic beaming of tuplets only - is this possible ?

On 11/21/2017 9:26 AM, Eby Mani wrote: Many thanks Urs. 2.16.2 is what is available on the repos, thus sticking to. Eby On Tue, 21/11/17, Urs Liska wrote: >I'm on lilypond 2.16.2 on ubuntu This is *really* outdated. 2.18 has been the st

Re: automatic beaming of tuplets only - is this possible ?

Hi Ben, is there a similar snippet available for ly 2.16. ?. Thanks. On Tue, 21/11/17, Ben wrote: Subject: Re: automatic beaming of tuplets only - is this possible ? To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: Tuesday, 21 November, 2017, 11:36 AM On

Re: automatic beaming of tuplets only - is this possible ?

Many thanks Urs. 2.16.2 is what is available on the repos, thus sticking to. Eby On Tue, 21/11/17, Urs Liska wrote: Subject: Re: automatic beaming of tuplets only - is this possible ? To: "Eby Mani" , lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: T

Re: automatic beaming of tuplets only - is this possible ?

On 11/21/2017 1:14 AM, Eby Mani wrote: Hi All, I couldn't find how achieve the following, i tried fiddling with \set Timing and \overrideTimeSignatureSettings related commands for beaming. 1, Automatically replace tuplet bracket with a slur. https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-use

Re: automatic beaming of tuplets only - is this possible ?

Am 21. November 2017 07:14:01 MEZ schrieb Eby Mani : >Hi All, I couldn't find how achieve the following, i tried fiddling >with \set Timing and \overrideTimeSignatureSettings related commands >for beaming. > >1, Automatically replace tuplet bracket with a slur. > >2, Automatically break beaming o

Re: Fwd: re: automatic beaming behavior

Reilly Farrell writes: > Thank you for your responses. In this case, we're looking to set up > beaming rules that LilyPond does not follow by default (such as grouping > consecutive eighth notes in pairs of two when in 4/4 time, rather than > groups of four). > > David, your solution seems just

Re: Fwd: re: automatic beaming behavior

Thank you for your responses. In this case, we're looking to set up beaming rules that LilyPond does not follow by default (such as grouping consecutive eighth notes in pairs of two when in 4/4 time, rather than groups of four). David, your solution seems just like what we need based on what I've

Re: Fwd: re: automatic beaming behavior

On Thu 20 Jul 2017 at 11:24:25 (-0700), Reilly Farrell wrote: > We are compiling several hundred melody and rhythm examples. Each example > references the same .ily file where global settings and formatting are > handled. Is there code for setting automatic behavior of beams that we can > put in th

Re: re: automatic beaming behavior

, July 20, 2017 7:24 PM Subject: Fwd: re: automatic beaming behavior We are compiling several hundred melody and rhythm examples. Each example references the same .ily file where global settings and formatting are handled. Is there code for setting automatic behavior of beams that we can put in

Fwd: re: automatic beaming behavior

We are compiling several hundred melody and rhythm examples. Each example references the same .ily file where global settings and formatting are handled. Is there code for setting automatic behavior of beams that we can put in the .ily file (not within a \relative { } block) to resolve the issue?

Re: use of set Timing.measurePosition is disrupting automatic beaming

> Elaine, I use repeat barlines at the start of each part because > bagpipe tunes always have them at the start and end of each part, and > repeat volta only places them at the end. > The easy way to get an initial repeat barline (an approach I prefer, too) is to use a barline that is defined to p

Re: use of set Timing.measurePosition is disrupting automatic beaming

> On 13 Sep 2016, at 10:17, Roderick Mackenzie > wrote: > I use repeat barlines at the start of each part because > bagpipe tunes always have them at the start and end of each part, and > repeat volta only places them at the end. You can override that with \bar, see Notation, “Bars, 1.2.5. It

Re: use of set Timing.measurePosition is disrupting automatic beaming

d end of >> > each part. In order to avoid the warnings about use of "\partial" >> > within the body of the score I am trying to use "\set >> > Timing.measurePosition = #(ly:make-moment -3/8)". >> >> As of version 2.19.12, \partial is

Re: use of set Timing.measurePosition is disrupting automatic beaming

the body of the score I am trying to use "\set > > Timing.measurePosition = #(ly:make-moment -3/8)". > > As of version 2.19.12, \partial is allowed in mid-measure. > > > My problem is that this command seems to disrupt the automatic > > beaming: the half measure before

Re: use of set Timing.measurePosition is disrupting automatic beaming

gt; within the body of the score I am trying to use "\set > Timing.measurePosition = #(ly:make-moment -3/8)". My problem is that > this command seems to disrupt the automatic beaming: the half measure > before the command is always printed as individual notes. In the > attache

Re: use of set Timing.measurePosition is disrupting automatic beaming

of the score I am trying to use "\set > Timing.measurePosition = #(ly:make-moment -3/8)". As of version 2.19.12, \partial is allowed in mid-measure. > My problem is that this command seems to disrupt the automatic > beaming: the half measure before the command is always printed

use of set Timing.measurePosition is disrupting automatic beaming

measurePosition = #(ly:make-moment -3/8)". My problem is that this command seems to disrupt the automatic beaming: the half measure before the command is always printed as individual notes. In the attached fragment the first one and a half measures are correctly beamed but then the last half bar has n

Re: Automatic beaming in polymetric (scaled) context

Simon Albrecht writes: > Hello Urs, > > you need to change the beamExceptions for that, see > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/beams#setting-automatic-beam-behavior. > The > syntax for that has changed recently, I see with surprise :-) If you compare http://lilypond.org/doc/

Re: [SPAM] Re: Automatic beaming in polymetric (scaled) context

5/independent-meters/ ? Best Urs Am 06.05.2014 09:52, schrieb Urs Liska: Hi, if I use \scaleDurations to create polymetric music like written in http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/displaying-rhythms.html#polymetric-notation there is no automatic beaming, see: { \tim

Re: Automatic beaming in polymetric (scaled) context

/v2.18/Documentation/notation/displaying-rhythms.html#polymetric-notation there is no automatic beaming, see: { \time 9/8 c8 c c c c c c c c \time 4/4 \set Staff.timeSignatureFraction = 9/8 \scaleDurations 8/9 { c8 c c c c c c c c } } Is that really right or is there a possibility

Automatic beaming in polymetric (scaled) context

Hi, if I use \scaleDurations to create polymetric music like written in http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/displaying-rhythms.html#polymetric-notation there is no automatic beaming, see: { \time 9/8 c8 c c c c c c c c \time 4/4 \set Staff.timeSignatureFraction

Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas

Colin Campbell writes: > I D/L the patch and applied it, ran make with no errors. I then > re-compiled my sample file, but saw no difference in behaviour. I > gather your patch should have prevented the melisma created in a > cadenza by manual beaming, but they still seem to happen. Do you make

Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas

On 13-10-26 02:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Colin Campbell writes: After wrestling with a transcription of an unmetered piece by Mark Sirett (Thou Shalt Know Him), my wife and I were going bonkers trying to get lyrics aligned to the notes. The piece has no time signature and bars of uneven leng

Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas

"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 4:49 AM > Subject: Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas > > >> Matthew Collett writes: >> >>> On 26/10/20

Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas

- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 4:49 AM Subject: Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas Matthew Collett writes: On 26/10/2013, at 4:10 pm, Colin Campbell wrote: We tried using \cadenzaOn to get the unmetered aspec

Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas

- Original Message - From: "Matthew Collett" To: "Colin Campbell" Cc: "LilyPond User Group" Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 4:28 AM Subject: Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas On 26/10/2013, at 4:10 pm, Colin Campbell wrote: We tried using \

Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas

Colin Campbell writes: > After wrestling with a transcription of an unmetered piece by Mark > Sirett (Thou Shalt Know Him), my wife and I were going bonkers trying > to get lyrics aligned to the notes. The piece has no time signature > and bars of uneven length. We tried using \cadenzaOn to get t

Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas

On 26/10/2013, at 6:58 pm, Colin Campbell wrote: We tried using \cadenzaOn to get the unmetered aspect, but the fundamental problem is that \cadenzaOn turns off autoBeam, which in turn means that manual beaming in a cadenza creates unwanted melismata. > > The aim was to get v

Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas

On 13-10-25 09:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Matthew Collett writes: On 26/10/2013, at 4:10 pm, Colin Campbell wrote: We tried using \cadenzaOn to get the unmetered aspect, but the fundamental problem is that \cadenzaOn turns off autoBeam, which in turn means that manual beaming in a cadenza

Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas

Matthew Collett writes: > On 26/10/2013, at 4:10 pm, Colin Campbell wrote: > >> We tried using \cadenzaOn to get the unmetered aspect, but the >> fundamental problem is that \cadenzaOn turns off autoBeam, which in >> turn means that manual beaming in a cadenza creates unwanted >> melismata. > >

Re: Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas

On 26/10/2013, at 4:10 pm, Colin Campbell wrote: > We tried using \cadenzaOn to get the unmetered aspect, but the fundamental > problem is that \cadenzaOn turns off autoBeam, which in turn means that > manual beaming in a cadenza creates unwanted melismata. So turn the autobeaming back on. I

Automatic beaming in vocal cadenzas

After wrestling with a transcription of an unmetered piece by Mark Sirett (Thou Shalt Know Him), my wife and I were going bonkers trying to get lyrics aligned to the notes. The piece has no time signature and bars of uneven length. We tried using \cadenzaOn to get the unmetered aspect, but the

Re: Automatic beaming in melismas

2012/3/21 Kieren MacMillan : > 1. The default auto-beaming should produce scores which represent the current > best practice in the engraving industry, which is to ignore lyrics (inside > and outside melismas) and beam as if it were instrumental music. And using slurs for melismas (which are int

Re: Automatic beaming in melismas

were instrumental music. 2. \autoBeamOff should mean exactly that — no automatic beaming (inside or outside a melisma) — or the command could be confusing. 3. In order to achieve "old" (e.g., 19th Century Novello) conventions, there should be an *additional* or *different* switch t

Re: Automatic beaming in melismas

would be that this: > > \relative c'' { > \autoBeamOff > r2 d4 g,8 g > c8 c c c b16 \melisma a b c b c a b > g16 fis g a g b a b c b c d c d b c > a4 \melismaEnd r r2 > } > \addlyrics { For un -- to us a child is born, __ } > > would produce automa

Re: Automatic beaming in melismas

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Xavier Scheuer wrote: > 2012/3/21 Janek Warchoł : >> >> The cool thing would be that this: >> >> (snip) >> >> would produce automatic beaming inside the melisma.  Of course, it >> should be possible to turn this off. &

Re: Automatic beaming in melismas

2012/3/21 Janek Warchoł : > > The cool thing would be that this: > > (snip) > > would produce automatic beaming inside the melisma. Of course, it > should be possible to turn this off. > > Is this acceptable to you? Maybe I'm missing an important point but AFA

Re: Automatic beaming in melismas

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > My 2¢: > >>> I'd like to easily make choral scores with automatic beaming >>> inside melismas and none outside. > >> I 100% support your wish. > > While I 100% the idea that Lilypond should

Re: Automatic beaming in melismas

My 2¢: >> I'd like to easily make choral scores with automatic beaming >> inside melismas and none outside. > I 100% support your wish. While I 100% the idea that Lilypond should do everything for everybody (within reason), I ***100% oppose*** this "feature" as

Re: Automatic beaming in melismas

Hi Ben On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: > > \version "2.15.32" > > I'd like to easily make choral scores with automatic beaming inside > melismas and none outside. Inspired by > https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1308, I

Automatic beaming in melismas

\version "2.15.32" I'd like to easily make choral scores with automatic beaming inside melismas and none outside. Inspired by https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1308, I wrote a Lilypond Guile function to do the same thing as the reporter's Perl script. Unfort

Re: Automatic beaming in 2/2

Hi me, sorry, should have read more carefully. Try: \version "2.14.2" music = \relative c'' { c16 c c c c c c c c8 c16 c c8 c16 c | r8 c c c c c c c | \break } \new Staff { \overrideTimeSignatureSettings #'(2 . 2) % timeSignatureFraction #'(1 . 4) % baseM

Re: Automatic beaming in 2/2

On 10/30/11 11:41 AM, "me" wrote: > > >I want the piece to be in 2/2 time, but with the 4/4 beamExceptions. >What's the best way to do this? Probably find the beamExceptions from 4/4 time in scm/time-signature-settings.scm and copy them into your source file. HTH, Carl

Re: Automatic beaming in 2/2

Hi me, 2011/10/30 me > (...) > > > I want the piece to be in 2/2 time, but with the 4/4 beamExceptions. > What's the best way to do this? > > which version? With "2.14.2" try: \version "2.14.2" \new Voice \relative c'' { \overrideTimeSignatureSettings #'(2 . 2) % timeSign

Automatic beaming in 2/2

Hi all. I'm transcribing a piece written in 2/2 time, but I don't like the automatic beaming that LilyPond uses when I set \time 2/2: %%% begin snippet %%% music = \relative c'' { c16 c c c c c c c c8 c16 c c8 c16 c | r8 c c c c c c c | \break } \new Staff {

Re: Automatic beaming global settings

On Sep 10, 2010, at 7:44 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: This problem is now fixed in git. If you don't build your own executable, you can get the new functionality easily by downloading scm/time-signature-settings.scm from the git repository and copying it to your scm/ directory. Otherwise, you c

Re: Automatic beaming global settings

This problem is now fixed in git. If you don't build your own executable, you can get the new functionality easily by downloading scm/time-signature-settings.scm from the git repository and copying it to your scm/ directory. Otherwise, you can wait for 2.13.33 to be released. Thanks for the bug

Re: Automatic beaming global settings

On 9/10/10 7:35 AM, "James Worlton" wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to define the set of default automatic beamings for a score. The > new beaming function is nice, but it won't let me set multiple rules in a > global variable. Here is what I'm trying to do--I have a rule for 4/4 and a > rule for

Re: Automatic beaming global settings

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Nick Payne wrote: > On 10/09/10 23:35, James Worlton wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to define the set of default automatic beamings for a score. >> The new beaming function is nice, but it won't let me set multiple rules in >> a global variable. Here is what

Re: Automatic beaming global settings

On 10/09/10 23:35, James Worlton wrote: Hello, I'm trying to define the set of default automatic beamings for a score. The new beaming function is nice, but it won't let me set multiple rules in a global variable. Here is what I'm trying to do--I have a rule for 4/4 and a rule for 3/4 that li

Automatic beaming global settings

Hello, I'm trying to define the set of default automatic beamings for a score. The new beaming function is nice, but it won't let me set multiple rules in a global variable. Here is what I'm trying to do--I have a rule for 4/4 and a rule for 3/4 that limits beaming to a quarter note: \version "2.

Re: Automatic beaming of dotted quavers

On 6/1/10 10:13 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote: > Carl, > > I spent a while trying to get this to work. It looks like the code possibly > ignores the numerator, and then treats the dotted 1/8 note as having a > minimum value of 1/16 and so applies the 1/16 override to the beaming. Yes, that's how I r

Re: Automatic beaming of dotted quavers

: "Carl Sorensen" To: "Richard Sabey" ; "Lilypond-user" Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 4:59 PM Subject: Re: Automatic beaming of dotted quavers On 6/1/10 2:28 AM, "Richard Sabey" wrote: How can I get Lilypond to beam dotted quavers in 12/16 as 2 pairs pe

Re: Automatic beaming of dotted quavers

On 6/1/10 2:28 AM, "Richard Sabey" wrote: > How can I get Lilypond to beam dotted quavers in 12/16 as 2 pairs per bar > automatically, while retaining its default behaviour of beaming semiquavers in > 4 threes per bar? I've tried what I thought was the correct syntax, but it > fails. > > %%% beg

Automatic beaming of dotted quavers

How can I get Lilypond to beam dotted quavers in 12/16 as 2 pairs per bar automatically, while retaining its default behaviour of beaming semiquavers in 4 threes per bar? I've tried what I thought was the correct syntax, but it fails. %%% beginning of example \version "2.13.17" { \time 1

Re: Automatic beaming of tuplets

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Nick Payne wrote: > I'm trying to get tupletted sixteenth notes automatically beamed in groups > of three in 3/4 time. The following beams the 16th notes in twos outside the > tuplet, but inside the \times 2/3 {} it doesn't work. Can it be done without > using manu

Automatic beaming of tuplets

I'm trying to get tupletted sixteenth notes automatically beamed in groups of three in 3/4 time. The following beams the 16th notes in twos outside the tuplet, but inside the \times 2/3 {} it doesn't work. Can it be done without using manual beaming? \version "2.13.4" \relative c' { \time

Re: Automatic beaming

2.11.65: % "real score", automatic beaming, does NOT work % Works with added revert -td \score { \relative c'' { \clef treble \key as \minor \time 2/4 #(revert-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 2 4) 1 4 'Staff) \set Staff.beatLength = #(ly:make-moment 1 8) %\set Sta

Re: Automatic beaming

Helge This works with 2.11.65: % "real score", automatic beaming, does NOT work % Works with added revert -td \score { \relative c'' { \clef treble \key as \minor \time 2/4 #(revert-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 2 4) 1 4 'Staff) \set Staff.beatLength = #

Re: Automatic beaming

I can manually set beaming. But since the piece has a regulare structure (almost only triples), I wanted to use automatic beaming. Unfortunately I did get i working. I attach the samples in one file (tuplet.ly) with some samples. The handwritten original score is placed here: http://dj1na.gmxhome.de

Re: Automatic beaming

beaming. But since the piece has a regulare structure (almost only triples), I wanted to use automatic beaming. Unfortunately I did get i working. I attach the samples in one file (tuplet.ly) with some samples. The handwritten original score is placed here: http://dj1na.gmxhome.de/pg-0009.JPG

Automatic beaming

beaming in the same length as the triplets as it is done in the hand writing original. I found in the manual (1.2.4 Beams) that I can manually set beaming. But since the piece has a regulare structure (almost only triples), I wanted to use automatic beaming. Unfortunately I did get i working. I

Idea for improved automatic beaming

Hi, Based on the recent discussions on automatic beaming, I got an idea on a possible improvement/simplification. Currently, a setting like #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 16 4 4) 1 4) means that beams are ended on the first beat if the beamed notes are 16th notes. What if we change

Re: automatic beaming in tuplets

ond is smart enough to produce good output for music that's not too complex. but i suspect that automatic beaming is not working correctly in certain cases involving tuplets. i include a short snippet with the corresponding image. i'm using a recently compiled 2.11.41 on linux. in 4/4 tim

automatic beaming in tuplets

hello list, i'm a beginner at lilypond, i know enough to enter music in a simple way. i still don't know enough of the language to try elaborate tweaks, but i find that usually lilypond is smart enough to produce good output for music that's not too complex. but i suspect that au

RE: Problems with automatic beaming when autoBeamOff in 3/8 time

Reinhold Kainhofer wrote on 28 December 2007 08:45 > > Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2007 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > > Hi Reinhold > > > > As the two types of bar have different > sub-beats there is > > no way to do this automatically with just a > single setting, > > AFAIK - every time the sub-be

Re: Problems with automatic beaming when autoBeamOff in 3/8 time

Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2007 schrieb Trevor Daniels: > Hi Reinhold > > As the two types of bar have different sub-beats there is > no way to do this automatically with just a single setting, > AFAIK - every time the sub-beating changes the new > beatLength will have to be indicated - just as if

RE: Problems with automatic beaming when autoBeamOff in 3/8 time

Sent: 27 December 2007 19:46 > To: LILYPOND Mailinglist > Subject: Problems with automatic beaming when > autoBeamOff in 3/8 time > > > Hi, > I have a score in 3/8 time with \autoBeamOff. > Now, some measures have one > eight and then four 16th (all connected by one > beam)

Problems with automatic beaming when autoBeamOff in 3/8 time

Hi, I have a score in 3/8 time with \autoBeamOff. Now, some measures have one eight and then four 16th (all connected by one beam), while others have a dotted eight and then three 16th (again, all connected by one beam). However, while in the first case all the 16th are connected by a second bea

Re: no automatic beaming: bug?

Note that you don't get any beam in the following example either (for the same reason): \score{ \relative c'{c8 d e} } Since the default beaming rules say that 8th notes should be beamed together 4 and 4 in common time, you could rather say that it's an inconsequence that \score{ \relative c'{

no automatic beaming: bug?

In lilypond 2.8.6 this input { << {c''8 d''8 c''8} \\ {r4.} >> r8 r2 } gives three eighth notes with seperated flags (i.e. without a beam). In my opinion, that is a bug. In contrast, the slightly modified input { << {c''8 d''8 c''8 r} \\ {r2} >> r2 } produces a beam. ~michael ___

  1   2   >