directory feature is
actually the corner case for specifying multiple configurations for a
single interface.
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Network interface configuration used to be either a file or a directory
named ifconfig.. With the latest lsb-compliant bootscripts,
it seems that the bootscript won't accept a file and neither will ifup
unless using -c. Is this intentional?
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/ma
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:56:23AM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/appendices/mit.html
>
> This license is fine with me.
I have no objections, either. Just wondering why.
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/
cope of the
> book, we'd need approval from all contributors. That is currently
> AFAIK Alexander, Archaic, Bruce, Dan, Jeremy, Matt, Michael Tremmor
> (IPFire), Nathan, and Myself. What license you have in mind?
Actually, I was referring to what Bruce said:
http://www.linuxfromscratch
e
> simply because it was requested so many times in the past, but possibly
> disable the functionality by default?
Disabled by default sound like a good compromise.
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
The kernel printk level is initially chosen before the consolelog script
runs, yet that script demands that the choice is also made in
/etc/sysconfig/console else it may override your initial decision. If
someone uses 'quiet' on the kernel cmdline, they've made their choice
and, IMO, should not hav
fig.h
@@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@
#define HAS_UNAME /**/
/*#define HAS_PHOSTNAME/ **/
#ifdef HAS_PHOSTNAME
-#define PHOSTNAME "/tools/bin/hostname"/* How to get the host name */
+#define PHOSTNAME "/usr/bin/hostname" /* How to get the host name */
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:22:47PM +0300, Agathoklis D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
>
> Actually Tony answered me, that the most
> sane solution is to source mswin.vim which offers a more nice environment.
Was he referring to vim on linux or vim on windows?
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromsc
u automatically get those changes.
Indeed, that sounds like a better option.
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
The vimrc that LFS creates is very spartan. There is a default
configuration that isn't bad plus it gives new users a quick idea of how
powerful the rc can be.
cp runtime/vimrc_example.vim /etc/vimrc
The if statement for bg=dark is not included, but could be appended if
so desired.
--
Ar
--- packages.ent(revision 8850)
+++ packages.ent(working copy)
@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@
+http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/";>
I was hoping to use &kernel;, but that has /pub/ at the end. Oh well. :)
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list
S all-in-one genesis script
was a bad idea? :^(
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
x27;d go for it (but I'd still have bash available).
However, too many language choices isn't necessarily a good thing.
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
n the source tree is very spartan. :/ Is anyone
intimately familiar with this package?
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
cations
on reentrancy. I currently have access only to Arch Linux and FreeBSD,
and the main perl binary in those links to libpthread. I'm curious what
debian-based and redhat-based distros are doing.
Any thoughts?
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lf
ed changed to gawk. Likewise, I suspect that some call gawk when they
should be calling awk. iana-etc is a case where it is done correctly. It
calls gawk, but really does need it (as written) and cannot use mawk.
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://ww
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:10:05AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> > PS: Nice to see you back on the lists, Archaic.
>
> I agree. Archaic, don't be a stranger.
/me waves at Bruce!
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/lis
isn't the only choice has been made.
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:55:15AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> # type [
> [ is a shell builtin
>
> # type test
> test is a shell builtin
If this is true for all sh-compatible shell, then I concur. Haven't
tested it, though.
> PS: Nice to see you back on t
The LFS bootscripts use both [ and test, so these should be moved to
/bin. readlink is not used by LFS/BLFS bootscripts, but is moved to
/bin. The FHS does not mention readlink at all, so just wondering if
this is the correct thing.
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
page, where the docs are symlinked, a hardcoded reference to
vim70 exists.
--
Archaic
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ou
> building on?
I'm running builds on 3 machines. 2 are dual CPU so I'll probably just
use the 3rd box which was used to create all the previous logs.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 04:57:08PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> I have clean logs for Ch. 6 gcc, glibc and binutils if you'd like me
> to do this now.
Go right ahead. I've run into difficulties with the build.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from yo
y
> logs.
I've got a build finishing up soon and will be uploading the logs.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:55:40AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Please create a ticket for this.
Done. http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1845
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscrat
Subject says it all. I know of three developers that have said it works.
I've been using it since Dan first made the patch. I see this as a must
for the final release. I recall someone saying something about fixingthe
patch headers, but I don't recall who or when.
--
Archaic
Wa
um} from the
> instructions?
I just re-rolled my local tarball, but it slows down testers who build
overnight.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mail
The udev-config tarball unpacks into the wrong directory.
# tar tf ../sources/udev-config-6.2-pre2.tar.bz2
udev-config-6.2/
udev-config-6.2/25-lfs.rules
<..>
Note the missing "-pre2" from the directory name. This causes the jhalfs
build to die.
--
Archaic
Want control
plus the glibc or gcc errors not noted above.
Thanks.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.or
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 12:22:47PM -0600, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> I believe that, previously, Archaic was creating these build logs with
> his personal scripts, which up to now has been sufficient.
Not just previously. Still.
> Now, however, we have perhaps a opportunity to
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:35:09PM +0100, TheOldFellow wrote:
>
> What I can't understand is why, when the CLFS rules have been working
> for months, that LFS had to reinvent the wheel?
The LFS rules have existed since at least June 15, 2004. They predate the
CLFS book.
--
most appropriate to cover it in BLFS. Bruce
has already posted one proposal for BLFS in the blfs-dev list.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscr
should not be thrown out just
because that are in the lfs repo. They should be copied into the new
repo and continued.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailma
email that detailed all the changes currently
made. There's more in my working copy as well. Things like adding more
subsystem rules so a few more devices won't need to be enumerated.
svn://linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/trunk/udev-config
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security fro
s can use.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ook's
rules should be confronted, but neither of them should be the base for
the new rules because they both do inefficient things.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linux
have the ability to have computer monitor's hooked up to them.
I can certainly understand that, but would that require a change to blfs
bootscripts, or just the base bootscripts? Other than architectural
differences in the base scripts, what would need to be changed in blfs?
--
Archaic
Wan
l his work. I just
packaged it, so what has been done so far is basically Alex's work with
me pitching in a bit. IOW, there is no need to throw the baby out with
the bath water yet.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http
pecially since they use cat commands to create the rules
they need.
As for bootscripts, it was always my put forth that CLFS differs in
method, but not final product, so I'm not understanding why the
bootscripts are different, either. Any cluebats would be welcome.
--
Archaic
Want control,
his thing to move forward, I'm all for it.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscri
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:03:49AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> I surely don't see it that way.
Not that yes or no question, the fact that a lot of questions have had
to be asked to write up the deps of various packages to contend for the
differences.
--
Archaic
Want control
ires a lot of hassle only because of Xfree. Does
any editor here use Xfree?
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ
his unified, same as many others. Please reply to the link above and we
can start the ball rolling. If it becomes a productive thing, I will have
another email ready shortly for the next chunk of device rules to be
scrutinized.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your oper
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:26:49PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
> >
> That was the point of this thread, Archaic, I said after Ryan and I
> discussed this I would post a response. So let's just forgot the whole
> thing and leave both projects separate.
Jim, you didn't post
his is nothing new nor is it a bad thing
especially in regard to how threads go so off topic on this list.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listin
nal unedited message is below.
- Forwarded message from Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
To: Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 21:27:18 -0600
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Re: RFC: new/changed udev rules - Part 1
-=OFFLI
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:20:53PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
> Archaic,
>Can you provide a link to that post?
I'll link to every pending lfs-dev item in my inbox. The first one is a
summary with several more links (some of which are already dealt with).
http://linuxfromscratch.or
t with. Some are not ticketed
so I posted a consolidating thread that serves well for notes. I don't
think we can freeze this week.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://lin
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 06:04:28PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> I suppose this one is just personal preference. I find creating and
> exiting a shell a much cleaner, more elegant solution.
Perhaps, but it doesn't script as easily. ;)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and
alk were the bomb!
:) I am inclined to go with 620, but I'll wait for community discussion.
BTW, in many cases a ^l will "unclobber" the screen (like in vim, and
ncurses-based apps).
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux Fr
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 07:21:34PM -0600, Archaic wrote:
>
> TTYPERM 0600
> needs to be
> TTYPERM 0620
I forgot to mention that 620 is how the book sets up /dev/pts as well.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardene
objections?
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
rovide
comments to what I wrote so we can move towards a finalized product.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ
've started a new thread that adds much more to think about. And yes,
dumping the script and using the pre-existing tools is the way to go if
we switch to manual creation of these rules.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux F
;t want to assume.
For a 5th option, we could use (in the case of Alex's drive):
ACTION=="add", ENV{ID_SERIAL}=="5VO1306DM00190", SYMLINK+="cdrom1"
This is true device persistence without the problem of uniqueness
associated with #3 above. However, it suffers from a s
ill be able to see the output of it
when it generates the rules file that the book instructs them to edit.
I'm indifferent on this. I see merit in both ways. However, if there is
ever to be a cooperative udev configuration between the books, we will
need community feedback.
--
Archaic
W
ated for these devices only
once. This generated file is completely customizable, and those device
symlinks will never change. Plus, and new devices added will
automatically be added to the generated file (again, each device is
added only one time). It seems like a win-win.
--
Archaic
Want contro
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:52:02PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
> Archaic and all I came around an interesting way to fix the cd-symlink
> issue
Jim, this thread is for discussion of what I posted. There was nothing
about disks in my OP. Please start a new thread so people can
distinguish b
in /etc/udev/rules.d. Why?
For modularity. All rules could be in one file, but then adding more
rules becomes harder (think BLFS instructions to add digital cameras).
> Is the newest udev compatible with older kernels, like 2.6.11.12?
No.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:12:17PM -0600, Archaic wrote:
>
> KERNEL=="vcs*", GROUP="tty"
Forgot one that isn't matched by the above:
KERNEL=="vcs", GROUP="tty"
# Added
# (clfs) doesn't have
hat, suse
KERNEL=="tty[0-9]*",MODE="620" GROUP="tty"
# Changed from 666 (too lax). Need to ensure this doesn't break anything. A live
# debian box shows 620, but the rules show 666.
# (clfs) NAME="%k" is unneeded
# last_rule - debian, gentoo, redhat, suse
KERNEL=="vcs*", GROUP="tty"
# Changed from 600 to default
# (clfs) NAME="%k" is unneeded and 620 is suse-specific. All others use default.
# last_rule - gentoo, redhat, suse
KERNEL=="console", MODE="600" GROUP="tty"
# Changed from 622
# (clfs) NAME="%k" is unneeded
# last_rule - debian, redhat, suse
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 05:18:48PM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> Agreed. Let's just ditch it. It's going nowhere fast.
And the others (save the latest stable release)?
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux F
look. As it turns out, I'm
glad I did. There hasn't been any housecleaning in some time. :)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-de
that it isn't worth trying patch it up, but that's not
my decision to make.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http:/
time) when you have to retrieve the root of the repo. Look in
LFS/trunk and you will see a file documenting exactly what revision
each tag/branch was removed. It is trivial to grab the revision you
need. Also, the XML is already archived for historical purposes at
archive.linuxfromscratch.org
--
all of those books is in the archive section. IIRC, the
procedure is to keep the last stable-released book and bootscript tags
and remove the rest.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 12:44:26AM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> If you do that it will take me another thousandth of a second to update
> my working copy.
>
> *sigh*
Shall I drop the occasional 60 MB file in there, then? :)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and sec
also
> put other files in the etc/ directory that are documented in Chapter 7.
I'd like to keep udev configuration separate from the bootscripts.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfroms
I can't imagine anyone disagreeing, but just to make sure, I'm wanting
to add the udev-config stuff to the root of the LFS repo just like the
bootscripts are. We currently have no revision control and that is just
a hassle.
Any arguments against this?
--
Archaic
Want control, educ
erhaps suboptimal from
a philosophical POV. The whole user/group thing is still in debate, so I
will leave it as it for now since BLFS does add the group attribute.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromsc
ng around like maniacs isn't going to help the
new book. The new server has been shipped and it is possible that that
will interfere with release anyway. Until then, we just keep doing test
builds and keep squashing bugs and everything will be fine.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and secu
contradicted yourself. :) After much thought on Ken's
thread about the "stable" releases, I see no reason to freeze the
kernel, at least within 2.6.16. 2.6.17 will not be added.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
.6.12.0-inotify-1.patch
and was discussed here:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2006-April/056688.html
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mai
r the now commonplace kernel upgrade). I'll get the kernel one
done probably today.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:29:50AM +0400, Vladimir A. Pavlov wrote:
> When building LFS-20060420, I had an error while testing tar in
> chapter6.
Please post on lfs-support. This is an error on your end, not the
book's.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from you
our patches do, either. Why
provide links for some and md5s for others?
> I've never seen a ticket assigned to me to answer questions. After all
> that's why we have the ticket system in place.
Discussion, for the most part, happens here, not in tickets.
--
Archaic
Want control, ed
gt; know I haven't done a lot of work in LFS lately, but today since I had
> some free time, I ventured out and looked at the outstanding tickets,
> and this is how I felt after looking at them.
Perhaps you should visit more often. ;) There have been a few udev rules
threads that I'd
the
name of the wiki page, I'd say that all topics covered on the book page
are fair game. If that is the case, I'd place the notest link at or near
the top of the book page. Currently it only holds font info, but it
could include something from the earlier paragraphs causing the link to
b
faces", could you please
> change this to 30-network.rules and verify with your single network card?
Gimme half a day and I can test it on my gateway with 2 NICs. I've got a
build going currently and will test once that is done. Until then, I'll
test a 1 NIC system and repo
http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/udev-config-20060502-try2.tar.bz2
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfr
ated by udev.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ly that many.
I found it once, but forget where. It was a c file in the kernel. A
#DEFINE, IIRC.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-de
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:11:53AM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> Originally I did just want a separate file to be included with the
> book's source. But, after Archaic reminded me that we actually link
> directly to the packages now, it seems like a good idea to inclu
ut PAM is
well-known for it (though granted it is generally user error).
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
usb_device", PROGRAM="/bin/sh -c 'X=%k X=$${X#usbdev} B=$${X.*}
D=$${X#*.}; echo bus/usb/$$B/$$D'", NAME="%c"
I put it at the beginning of the USB section.
The new tarball is here:
http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/udev-config-20060502.tar.bz2
--
Archaic
Wa
the version entities, it would make it rather difficult to forget
to update them, too! :)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-de
oesn't really matter other than to show that I'm uncomfortable
with assumption.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http
static device nodes. When will the next incompatible change happen
in udev?
Of course, if you are volunteering to track the kernel changes in
released books and keep the errata up to date, that would be welcomed.
;)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating s
meone who knows toolchains to answer
the "should or should not" question, and then I need a way to test (Dan
mentioned coreutils-cvs).
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:50:58PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
> Here's a simple program to test with archaic.
Thanks Jim. :)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
t fixes it is the patch below? (needed for distros that
> don't want to rev the whole package...)
Alex, was the attached patch the proper fix? And have you heard anymore
about the 3.3 release? There still only exists the pre1 tarball from
February.
--
Archaic
Want control, educa
Thanks for the info, Dan. I forgot to ask (and it's OT according to the
subject line), but do you have some advice about testing the new
syscalls, or better yet, does anyone see a need to include the new
syscalls?
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating s
iate
it. I'd like to stay away from gui apps if at all possible because it
would take quite some time to get to the actual testing stage.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
ht
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:01:28PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> OK, here's a second go at it:
Looks good. I see one thing, though:
"The most likely reason is that something went wrong with the specs file
amendment above."
s/above// because it isn't relevant on t
S installation can establish sanity and stability. We would need huge
compile farms to try and reach any level of confidence if the base
system kept changing.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.
/chapter09/whatnow.html
> and (b) try out test (-rc) kernels [ because they do need testing ] if
> they are prepared to do the necessary background reading to follow
> what is going on, and prepared to handle reporting bugs on lkml.
I disagree. It isn't the readers responsibility to test
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 06:37:39PM -0600, Archaic wrote:
>
> This issue was fixed around 3.1.10. If the patches were created properly
> by us and applied properly by you, then this should not happen. I'll
> look into it. Thanks for the report.
Hrmm, the patch is right, and
ted properly
by us and applied properly by you, then this should not happen. I'll
look into it. Thanks for the report.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 06:15:50PM -0400, Chris Staub wrote:
>
> I'm guessing you mean Automake, not Autoconf.
Yes, hasty in my typing. :)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlf
r error is always likely. :)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above i
1 - 100 of 574 matches
Mail list logo
