On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:07:49AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > At the moment, we seem happy to let people stick with the kernel they > built when they built LFS.
I don't understand. We don't control what a user does. We give a build recipe, throw in some educational material, give guidelines on how to maintain the system. What exactly are you asking that we do? 2.6.16 is most likely the kernel that will be used in lfs-6.2 due mostly to timing issues. We can't wait for 2.6.17 to settle down, else a book would never get released. If a 2.6.16.x release comes out during the testing phase, we could look at it, test it a bit, perhaps discuss on-list, but I'm not prepared to make the blanket statement that any point release from the 2.6.16 branch is a suitable drop-in without testing. But I'm also not the release manager. Matt is, so what I say here doesn't really matter other than to show that I'm uncomfortable with assumption. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
