On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:52:35PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote: > > I think it's a bit too soon to be saying that it's failed. LFS has only > been using a udev-config tarball, the contents of which come from the > LFS svn repo, for a short period of time.
No, not even. The repo has not been used to create a tarball yet. The tarball was created simply from what already existed plus the persistence rules and the bug rule. It was created only to make installation of the rules easier. My hope was that the next tarball release would come from the repo so I went and added the files to a repo, made a few changes that I posted about long before committing, and have a few more changes waiting that I was going to post about before committing. And BTW, Alex was consulted on all of these changes to verify their sanity first. As for the persistence stuff, that's all his work. I just packaged it, so what has been done so far is basically Alex's work with me pitching in a bit. IOW, there is no need to throw the baby out with the bath water yet. -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
