Re: [issues] Re; FAQ Answer request

2000-03-02 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if coder > As a male I would have to say id be terrified of any peroson attempting > to beat me with their penis. As another male I'd quite like that :P Rik -- Take irony for granted. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org

Re: [issues] Re; Religion (Was YAFGA)

2000-02-25 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Mary Wood > If one is looking to learn a little more about a given religion from > an unbiased source (not always easy to find), a good start is > Religious Tolerance.org; [...] Cool :) I'm actually quite interested in religions, despite not liking them in general (I blame them for lots of th

Re: [issues] Religion (was: YAFGA...)

2000-02-24 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Erin Clarke [...] > It is more than I can ever hope to encompass in any one email reply... [=^J Sounds like me, though I'd just call myself a scientist, and a gentle person. Perhaps I can call myself 'spiritual' instead :) I've been reading a lot about systems thinking recently (Capra's 'Web

Re: [issues] Re; Religion (Was YAFGA...)

2000-02-24 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Mary Wood > - Mary; hoping she threw enough disclaimers and qualifiers > on this post to avoid total barbecue. Yes, well put :) I too love the idea of 'him' being a Good Man, and like the things he's reported to have said and done. He seems to have been one of the few truly 'pure'

Re: [issues] Religion (was: YAFGA...)

2000-02-23 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Erin > Snarfblat wrote: > > > > On a > > somewhat similiar tangent, are very many of you religious? > > I am spiritual but not religious. I am neither. Sometimes I wish I was religious. Then perhaps I wouldn't have to think about the Universe so much. > Principally, and in my understandi

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Jeff > I always think of it as $DEITY, an environmental variable set by my .login or >.profile scripts, I set mine to Kibo, y'all can set yours to whatever god/goddess you >worship most (my current understanding of polytheism is that one would believe in >many gods, but have one they primar

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Kirrily 'Skud' Robert > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rik Hemsley wrote: > > > >If you have more (qualified) women than men applying for posts, then > >you can hardly be accused of reverse discrimination. > > They can't take it to court and e

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Kelly Lynn Martin > Why? The only reason for having this is to make it easier for guys > who are attracted to bisexual women (yeh) but are themselves not > actually bisexual to more easily identify their prey. Good point. Sod it. Rik -- Usurp reality. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Jenn V. > We *actually have* a unisex descriptor word for a category of > human beings where sex/gender is irrelevent - and you want to > split it? > > Why? I don't understand. Genuine question, not sarcasm. WHY? Good point, actually. Leave it ambiguous :) Rik -- Transgress. **

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > If I sit in front of a screen all day and program, does that > > necessarily make me a geek ? :) > > Nope. There's plenty of proto-suits who do it, after all. Hmm. I noticed the word 'suit' in there. Having never worn one on principle, I don't think I count for that cat

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Kirrily 'Skud' Robert > Suits me. Cept that if I hire any more female geeks, I'm going to start > getting accused of reverse discrimination. > > Actually, you recall what I said about training courses, that we're > getting more women than men attending them? We're also getting more > women

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Dan McGarry > Dan (still pining for a mixed-brain-dominant job) McGarry Wots one of them ? Rik -- Mock your own urgency. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-21 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Snarfblat > does anyone dislike the idea of non platonic relationships in general? > Anyone choose not to date and and such, using your time concentrate on > other things? I've never asked anyone out, nor been on a 'date'. I don't understand how all that works. Call me different. Rik -- P

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-21 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Jenn V. > Lets make Melbourne an enclave of Linux-wielding hippie geek > vegan dykes - and those who don't quite fit that description. > (linux-wielding hippie geek vegan males are welcome too. And > those who don't quite fit...) Is it ok if I don't call myself a geek ? If I sit in front of

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-21 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if J B > > Personally, (and the person that I am dating feels the same way) sexual > frustration builds up if it is not relieved on occasion. And sexual > frustration tends to be distracting...can sometimes keep me from thinking > straight. After 4 years, you forget about it, believe me. R

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-21 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Tania M. Morell > I've met 2 men who I really enjoy talking to, though. I win. I've found 4. Wanna buy one off me ? > > Rik - one of those days... > > uh huh.. One of them days where you have to recompile with debugging symbols. Oh for the day when we port KDE to Java... Rik -- Visit th

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-21 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Tania M. Morell > Boy, do I even belong here? I'm a geek... but not queer, is this ok? No. Go away. You responsible for over-population and adverts for chewing gum. > I wish the women I've met were as expressive and intellectual as the > people here. Arse. > I never considered myself a

Re: [issues] YAFGA (Yet Another Female Geeks Article)

2000-02-15 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Laurel Fan > On a completely different subject, what is a better, non-adversarial way > of analyzing a design? The whole "you point out problems and I'll tell > you why they're not" thing seems to work pretty well for me... If you haven't got it written down in English, with diagrams, do tha

Re: [issues] Car or not?

2000-02-14 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Dianna Gregory > I didn't have a car for the longest time. Mostly for financial > reasons. But the problem I found with not having a car is that 1) If > it's a pain in the butt to get to the grocery store, I won't go more > than once every 3 months, and if I want to eat reasonably healthy, I

Re: [issues] Car or not? (Was, re; Skud's new article...)

2000-02-12 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Deb Richardson > I hate to do this, but could you folks move the cars discussion to the > grrltalk list? It's not really "on topic" for the issues list. Thanks > :) moved :) Rik -- 135. Displace the canon with attitude. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org

Re: [issues] Skud's new article on geek chicks..

2000-02-11 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if coder > get a new volkswagon bug. Paint it weird colors. play your music > loud. Driving will be tolerable. ;) That's two people who've recommended a Beetle. Perhaps I will :) Ah.. no the best thing about driving is probably hollering at the top of your voice to the music. Until you get f

Re: [issues] Skud's new article on geek chicks..

2000-02-11 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Shad Young > Sorry, Rik. Reading that back to myself I realize the inappropriateness > of the choice of the word "resent". Please accept my apologies. No problem :) I'm still working on being bothered enough to write things like 'obviously there are plenty of cases where this doesn't apply' j

Re: [issues] Skud's new article on geek chicks..

2000-02-11 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Shad Young > > Hmm. I'd say that left to their own devices men will just start > > getting worse again. They certainly need some prompting. > > As a man I resent that statement. Men are not "Neanderthals". We have a > brain. We have morals. We know the differece between right and wrong. We >

Re: [issues] Skud's new article on geek chicks..

2000-02-11 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Jenn V. > > Hmm. I'd say that left to their own devices men will just start > > getting worse again. They certainly need some prompting. > > *grin* is that an admission of guilt? :) Hehe, don't look at me. I've been training my brain. I'm a real human being these days. Woops, I found myself

Re: [issues] Mm? Quotas?

2000-02-11 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Sunnanvind > Just saw something odd on http://www.windowmaker.org that I though we > might be interested in... > "In light of a recent article about geek chicks which was posted on > Freshmeat, I felt it was a good time to renew our call for volunteers. > The current core Window Maker team is

Re: [issues] Skud's new article on geek chicks..

2000-02-11 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Jenn V. > In my experience, though, if females attempt to change male > behaviour - the male behaviour gets worse. So I'm inclined to let > the males who /are/ sympathetic//equalist take charge of the male > change. Hmm. I'd say that left to their own devices men will just start getting wors

Re: [issues] Mm? Quotas?

2000-02-11 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if J B > I know that I, as a geek boy, prefer geek chix to "norms". It is so hard to > have an intelligent conversation with your average, stereotypical female, > whereas the geeks can and will talk about everything. Includung, but not > limited to computers, movies, books, etc. Same here.

Re: [issues] Skud's new article on geek chicks..

2000-02-09 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Sunnanvind > 2) Trouble will be huge for those who doesn't fit the mold, like queers, > hippies, punkrockers etc etc. Mmm.. well, I'm a bi hippie punk and I've never had any trouble. Perhaps it's because I look like a serial killer ? :) > Sunnan (mm, trouble will be huge for me) Not yet. I a

Re: [issues] Skud's new article on geek chicks..

2000-02-09 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if srl > > The truth is that while many of these sorts of reasons may be true > > in some cases, it's actually quite usual for kids who attend single-sex > > schools to have contact with the opposite sex outside of school hours. > > are we talking primary/secondary schools here, or colleges? I t

Re: [issues] Skud's new article on geek chicks..

2000-02-09 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if srl > [me] > > I really can't bring myself to say that single sex schools are a > > Good Thing, despite the obvious academic advantages. > > > > I agree with Sunnan. The costs of segregation are too high. > > As a graduate of a single-sex institution, i might agree with you; but > what do yo

Re: [issues] Skud's new article on geek chicks..

2000-02-09 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Sunnanvind > Single-sex environments are very bad for society in the long run in my very > humble opinion. I really can't bring myself to say that single sex schools are a Good Thing, despite the obvious academic advantages. I agree with Sunnan. The costs of segregation are too high. Cheers