> GIM69192S ** RECEIVE PROCESSING HAS FAILED FOR ORDER ORD00014. AN ERROR WAS
> FOUND IN THE RESPONSE RECEIVED FROM THE
> SERVER AT
> https://eccgw01.boulder.ibm.com/services/projects/ecc/ws/ WHEN PROCESSING
> ORDER ORD00014 WITH
> ORDERID H09421646.
> GIM69226Ifault
Not disagreeing with Charles at all, his response in this thread
triggered more thoughts on this end.
As I said privately to the OP, there are really only two options when
transferring files between mainframe op sys (MVS, VM, VSE, TPF) and PC
(Windoze, Mac, Linux): binary and plain text. Anyth
I never had to think about blocksize when the input was from a physical
card reader 50 years ago. Best practices change so quickly!
On 2025-01-21 12:00 a.m., IBM-MAIN automatic digest system wrote:
Date:Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:48:36 -0500
From:Matt Hogstrom
Subject: Re: Does this make any
Interesting, please let us know when it runs from TSO.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Wasn’t MVS Open Edition available in MVS 4.3.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:19:46 -0500, Rick Troth wrote:
>...
>So the next trick will be to figure out how to run it from TSO without
>having to get into a shell.
>...
That feels like trying "to figure out how to run ISPF from shell
without having to get into TSO." (Which I have on occasion w
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 12:36:04 -0500, David Spiegel wrote:
>Hi Rick,
>You said: "... for more than 30 years. ..."
>OS/390 was release in late 1995.
>Did you get an early copy?
>
I believe OMVS antedates OS/390, perhaps MVS 5.2.2.
>On 2025-01-21 12:23, Rick Troth wrote:
>> rambling and thinking-out
rambling and thinking-out-loud follows
On 1/21/25 11:12 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:19:46 -0500, Rick Troth wrote:
...
So the next trick will be to figure out how to run it from TSO without
having to get into a shell.
...
That feels like trying "to figure out how
Financial institutions in particular strictly control what sites outside of the
mainframe can be accessed by the mainframe (outgoing requests in particular).
I put those restrictions down to auditor paranoia and incompetence with respect
to the mainframe environment, which are widespread if not
Paul Gilmartin wrote, in part:
>What does UNICODE say about overstrike?
Nothing. That's not a character thing per se. Now, there are "combining"
characters, like some accents, but that's kinda different.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscri
Hi Rick,
You said: "... for more than 30 years. ..."
OS/390 was release in late 1995.
Did you get an early copy?
Regards,
David
On 2025-01-21 12:23, Rick Troth wrote:
rambling and thinking-out-loud follows
On 1/21/25 11:12 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:19:46 -0500, Rick Tr
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:35:12 -0500, Rick Troth wrote:
>
>As I said privately to the OP, there are really only two options when
>transferring files between mainframe op sys (MVS, VM, VSE, TPF) and PC
>(Windoze, Mac, Linux): binary and plain text. Anything else really needs
>to be considered a specia
Internet protocols use CRLF for new line, as do several PC OS's, *IX use LF.
What OS are you running sed in?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion L
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 16:19:46 +, Jerry Whitteridge wrote:
>Yes absolutely ! FTP to external sites is strictly controlled.
>
Is the concern with the intrinsic weakness of FTP? would FTPS
(AT/T:S) be better? Does cbttape.org support those?
If the concern is malware infiltration, curl, HTTPS, an
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 16:45:42 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Not naive at all; it allowed overprinting. That's true even when the target
>device doesn't implement those functions; the device driver deals with it.
>
"The good thing about standards is ..."
There's also Machine Carriage Control and "
Normally I like to include attribution on these taglines, but I'm afraid I ran
into that at some random location and can't tell you where it came from. I
promise I didn't invent it myself, though.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* Opportunity is missed by most people
>From what I remember, and it's been decades, MVS Open Edition came out with
>MVS/ESA 5.2.2, but I could be very wrong too.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com
On Tuesday
Convoluted and not intuitive but it works.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 6:05 PM Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:10:57 -0600, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
> >Corrected URL as the article was moved to the Tutorials section of the site
> >https://dinoframe.io/tutorial/a-rexx-outtrap-secret
You are correct - Open Edition was released with MVS//SP 4.3 in1986
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 6:23 PM Mark Jacobs
<0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> From what I remember, and it's been decades, MVS Open Edition came out with
> MVS/ESA 5.2.2, but I could be very wrong too.
>
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 12:23:17 -0500, Rick Troth wrote:
>rambling and thinking-out-loud follows
>...>
>It might not even be needed. The current 'pipe' command in XFL already
>has to un-do the command line tokenization done by the shell so that the
>pipeline can be processed as a single string.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 16:04:45 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Internet protocols use CRLF for new line, as do several PC OS's, *IX use LF.
>
"veral PC OS's" are getting better. I discovered lately that Notepad
works without the .
was the naive design practice of conflating device protocols
with da
Yes absolutely ! FTP to external sites is strictly controlled.
Jerry Whitteridge
Sr Manager Managed Services
jerry.whitteri...@albertsons.com
480 578 7889
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lionel B Dyck
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2025 9:16 PM
To: IBM-MAI
Not naive at all; it allowed overprinting. That's true even when the target
device doesn't implement those functions; the device driver deals with it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
___
Thanks, Kurt.
Opened a Support Case.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:46 AM Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
> > GIM69192S ** RECEIVE PROCESSING HAS FAILED FOR ORDER ORD00014. AN ERROR
> WAS FOUND IN THE RESPONSE RECEIVED FROM THE
> > SERVER AT
> > https://eccgw01.boulder.ibm.com/services/projects
Sorry ... I'm including the years before that when "mainframe people"
and "Unix people" were at odds.
In those days, I worked in shops where interoperability reigned, so I
was sensitive to the noise and was (am) frustrated by the disconnect.
But ... no ... no early copy. I got access to "OpenEd
Experts just today confirmed an investment of 500 billion to build AI data
centers. No matter what this group believes, AI is real and the future of
technology.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/21/tech/openai-oracle-softbank-trump-ai-investment?cid=ios_app
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tues
I want the truth, always. Like manmade global warming is real. Today, the truth
is whatever bull people want to believe. You can find people who believe the
earth is flat. (It isn’t) That’s why I always deferred to the experts here. Not
the ones who think they are experts but the actual experts.
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 21:10:57 -0600, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
>Corrected URL as the article was moved to the Tutorials section of the site
>https://dinoframe.io/tutorial/a-rexx-outtrap-secret
It took me a while to understand what the alternative was to
call outtrap 't.'
x = sayit('Calling LISTD')
A 35+ year quest to port MSDOS (or similar) to the mainframe
has now been sufficiently done.
My usual integrity test is to see if gcc 3.2.3 can reproduce itself.
The z/PDOS-generic version of gcc 3.2.3 can now do this - byte-exact.
A ridiculous amount of effort was spent to get here. More-or-less
wow Paul, congratulations! Cannot wait to check it out!
best regards,
René.
> On 22 Jan 2025, at 07:53, Paul Edwards
> <0676ab6435a5-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> A 35+ year quest to port MSDOS (or similar) to the mainframe
> has now been sufficiently done.
>
> My usual integ
30 matches
Mail list logo
