(cc'ing general to inform the pmc. if this is not the right procedure then
hopefully someone will post a correction.)
some of the source code (still under weblogic packages) contains some
strange @author tags. example:
@author Copyright (c) 1997 by WebLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
i think t
does anyone know the nightly builds (source and binaries) policy and
practice for incubating projects...?
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cool.
there have been requests from users for source tar balls for xml-beans. it
isn't currently included. could someone please point me in the right
direction?
- robert
On Friday, October 17, 2003, at 06:32 PM, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
There are now 4-times-a-day tarballs of snapshots of the
jochen's recent announcement set me thinking about where the right
place for announcements like this. general's a cool place but should it
also go to announcements at ws? does incubator need an announcements
list?
- robert
-
T
On 21 Jan 2004, at 10:41, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
* The developers PGP keys aren't part of any web of trust. Mainly an
issue of physical separation between the developers.
interesting requirement, this one.
IIRC at the last count i was the biggest offender at apache for this
(in terms of isol
may i suggest that a practical workaround for the issue (that started
this debate) would be to ask all contributors to use jira. i should
think that it would be possible to add another checkbox to allow
contributors to give explicit permission for dual licensing (ASL and
GPL).
(i can't resist addi
On 7/31/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2005, at 7:36 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > may i suggest that a practical workaround for the issue (that started
> > this debate) would be to ask all contributors to use jira.
>
&
On 7/31/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IMHO the whole concept of a default license for a mailing list is
> > problematic. it's hard to see how we could ensure that users have
> > given knowing consent.
>
> Well, you won't be able to subscribe without seeing it,
would the
On 7/31/05, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On 7/31/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > with the ASL2, apache is covered through the license but AIUI this
> > does not extend to sublicensing. personally
On 7/31/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2005, at 9:57 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > On 7/31/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> . personally speaking, i do not accept
> >>> new fi
On 7/31/05, Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> robert burrell donkin gmail.com> writes:
> > On 7/30/05, Dalibor Topic kaffe.org> wrote:
> > IMHO the free software foundation's theory of implicit patent grants
> > being embedded in the GPL is qui
> Comments? (Like I need to ask for them... )
Re: Part VIII : Employment Limitations
may need to think about the differences in employment law in different
jurisdications.
AIUI European employment law typically does not recognise the concept
of trade secrets and strictly limits the rights of
On 8/1/05, Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > of trade secrets and strictly limits the rights of employers to
> > material created by an employee in their own time using their
> > materials.
>
On 9/5/05, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> >
> > > I suggest that we go further and make it a requirement
> > > of graduation from the Incubator that the project
> > > already has some people helping at infra@
> >
> > That can only appl
AIUI the incubator is now the right way for substantial code
contributions to existing codebases to enter the ASF (whether from
existing committers who have developed the code in isolation or from
non-committers). i've taken a look around the current incubator
documentation and i can only find mate
On 10/17/05, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Joao
>
> 2005/10/14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > >Sounds very interesting and it is similar to what was in our MINA
> > roadmap.
> > >MINA project team will provide protocol handlers for well-known
> protocols
> > >such F
was browsing the roller project today and noticed that the source was
packaged org.roller.xyz. i took a look at http://www.roller.org
domain. this is currently parked and quite possibly for sale. the
external site for roller is http://www.rollerweblogger.org/.
not sure whether this is an issue or
ping?
- robert
On 11/8/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> choose one...
>
> On Nov 8, 2005, at 12:11 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> > Actually, we'd like to have them all in one place, I believe. So a
> > directory under or a peer of the projects directory, perhaps.
> >
> > ---
hello all
i need to get the paperwork sorted out for the import of code developed
outside the ASF into the pool component of jakarta-commons. i've been
subscribed to incubator for a while but haven't seem a definite answer to
this question. i'm willing to find time to develop some documentation if
thanks for the speedy replies :)
i think i understand now.
- robert
On 11/15/05, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > do we want these IP Clearance reports to end up on the Incubator
> website?
> >
> > Yes. See:
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incu
On 11/15/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think i understand now.
but i would like to ask about software grant best practice.
(again, i'm not sure whether this is documentated anywhere or not)
i've done some digging around and think that the software
On 11/17/05, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >
> > > We should probably create a sub-directory and collect them all.
> >
> > Okay.
>
> That is done now. All existing IP Clearance documents
> are now at:
> http://incubator.apache.org/i
On 11/17/05, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >
> > i've done some digging around and think that the software grant applies
> to a
> > specific, concrete instance of the source. this will typically be
> exam
On 11/17/05, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
> > Last modified at [$Date: 2005-01-20 01:12:13 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2005) $]
>
> It has been pointed out a couple of times in the past (see the posts
> bel
On 11/19/05, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On 11/17/05, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >>
> >>>APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indent
On 12/5/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a
> vote. There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two
> weeks, so I'll assume that people are comfortable with this.
>
> So what say ye?
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate
On 12/5/05, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Roy T.Fielding wrote:
> >
> > No, the proposal is all about SOA. What you are saying is that the
> > *actual plan* is about SCA. What I am saying is that the proposal
> > needs to match the actual plan, preferably a plan that is actionable,
On 12/7/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Lance,
>
> Better start with WSS4J to earn karma :) while we get started on
> Tuscany. +1 for any help we can get.
+1
takes a while to get everything checked, approved and the paperwork
completed for a new incubation project. lending a
On 12/7/05, Kenneth Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Glad to see a strong show of interest from the WS PMC, look forward to
> working more w/ you guys.
>
> How about a BoF around Tuscany so all the folks who have expressed
> interest and are present can get together for a f2f? I'll be there
> Mo
On 12/21/05, Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> > Sam Ruby wrote:
> >> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >>
> >> As a general rule, the ASF doesn't go out "inviting", people
> >> within the ASF either start a new project, or projects come to us.
>
On 12/21/05, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The ASF isn't very good at "saying no", at least not very loudly. All our
> processes are geared at "saying yes" the right way and only if we feel
> comfortable. It seems we have something to learn here, and its a bit scary
> since this may ha
On 12/22/05, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2005, at 7:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> > Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I think the Incubator would best serve the ASF if we/they had
> >> the ultimate authority to vote on, even if the PMC approves a
> >> proposed proj
On 12/22/05, Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) We are not in the incubator anymore.
> 2) Odd...not sure what's up with that.
if it's wrong, patch it :)
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additio
(for the benefit of those joining the thread, here's the context)
> > On 12/22/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the way people vote are a matter of record and so reputations are at stake
> > both inside and outside apache. voting for a duff rel
On 12/22/05, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On December 22, 2005 3:26:57 PM -0500 Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > As I look through the list of projects in the incubator, trying to figure
> > out where I can be useful, I notice several projects that have been in
> >
On 12/22/05, Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > On 12/21/2005 7:22 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> Right now any PMC can automatically ok projects into incubator. How
> >> about we change that rule? So that the only pmc that can approve a
> >>
On 12/22/05, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your comments. We should maybe capture some of
> the points raised in this thread into the incubation guide?
+1
submit a patch ;)
(been waiting years to say that to james)
AUIU the consensus seems to be that the doc
On 12/22/05, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder whether there isn't another problem here: that of the
> (missing) oversight of the PMC that originally voted the project into
> incubation. For instance, while I'm on the DB PMC and voted e.g. Derby
> into incubation (just to pick a
On 12/23/05, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 08:01:14PM -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> > Incubator Graduation Check List
> > ---
> >
> > [ ] Move svn repo from incubator to new location
> > [ ] *** ? *** requests that infras
On 12/23/05, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If any ASF PMC believes it is in the best interest of the Foundation to
> accept a podling and they are willing to dedicate resources ("people") -
> then anyone on the Incubator PMC has no standing to challenge that
> decision. When a PM
On 12/23/05, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23.12.2005, at 16:57, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:11:55AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> > ...
> >> I think that there's little downside to this. A check on the
> >> Incubator PMC is the board - any member or
On 12/26/05, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The software grant forms have been completed and sent to the Apache
> Software Foundation. Can someone within ASF confirm that they have been
> received?
AIUI jim's on holiday till the new year. hopefully someone will jump
in if someone el
On 12/28/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I was browsing the ip-clearance documents
> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/).
> IMNSHO, I don't like what's happening. It *SHOULD* be incubator PMC's
> call whether an incoming do
On 1/4/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is a way to use Forrest itself to produce
> xml output ...
>
>
> 0)
> Assuming that forrest is installed as per:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
i've been following this debate (off and o
On 1/20/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
> > Hola,
> > Sure, but J Aaron already beat me to it ;)
> >
> > One other decent page not included in his post is
> > http://www.apache.org/info/support.cgi of HTTP support providers. The
> > text at the top is good.
>
> T
jakarta still has a new project page from way back:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html. it's highly ranked by
google (which is why i found it still existed).
1 would it be a good idea to redirect traffic towards an appropriate
page in the incubator and if so, which page?
2 has any app
On 2/2/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> James Strachan wrote:
> How should the disclaimer be associated?
>
> Well, this is a bit of an issue. Why are the plain jars available? To
> allow automated downloads by Maven? I have an issue with that, since it
> could allow people
On 2/1/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could someone kindly describe (or point us to a document explaining)
> how to reset a user password at people.apache.org?
i don't that this is documented anywhere (or indeed whether there's
concensus about the right way to do this).
but infr
On 2/9/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
> >> dev list or ppmc list? Only PMC members' votes are binding for
> >> full TLPs; I suggest having the vote on the dev list as mentioned
> >> but only the PPMC members' votes being bi
On 2/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why not just modify incubator procedure to make it clear that
>
> 1) Mentors make the requests and
>
> 2) They sign the email w/ the title "$PODLING_NAME Mentor"
+1
Now #2 don't prevent someone from misrepresenting themselves - which
>
On 2/18/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why are you being so negative? Let's try to make it work. If it does
> not then we decide what do next as a PPMC.
i'm not sure that james is being negative: just excitable :)
there are different paths to unification. it's not always bes
AFAIK importing an external codebase into an existing project is
covered in just two documents:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
and http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#import
if anyone knows of anywhere else this information is covered, please
post a link.
IMO the current docu
seems like the pmc could use a few more eyeballs to spread the load.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200602.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the latest post by james (not on the archives yet). i have spare
lunchtimes i could use if that'd help...
- robert
signature.asc
On 2/28/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IMO, this looks like a very worthwhile proposal, but I
> > would consider that this may likely be best under
> > db first, with movement to TLP sometime after that,
> > at least at this stage. I am also curious about the
> > comparison bet
i've prepared the paperwork to clear a donation of code to Jakarta. i
don't have incubator site karma so i've attached the patch to this JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org:443/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-15.
please check and (if there are no mistakes) commit. i'll pause for
objections until 2200 Thursday 9
On 3/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Robert,
> >
> >
> >>i've prepared the paperwork to clear a donation of code to Jakarta. i
> >>don't have incubator site karma so i've attached the patch to this JIRA:
> >>https://issues.apache.org:443/jira/brows
On 3/8/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2006/3/8, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Below is a proposal to incubate an Open JPA project at Apache. I've also
> > posted this at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal.
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> May I be include
On 3/8/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
> > Hola,
> > A couple of questions:
> >
> >> :Core Developers:
> >> Fourteen of the initial committers are BEA employees. One of those is a
> >> committer on the Apache JDO project. We anticipate that five of these
On 3/8/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Both QA and docs as proposed committers means to me that this project
> > already has mature processes in place that will be good for the
> > community.
>
> You're more trusting than I am. I still feel like commit access is
> something to be
On 3/8/06, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/8/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is duplication really that bad? So long as the communities are vibrant,
> > why should we care? Also, have you factored in different requirements
> > and different implementation str
On 3/8/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hola,
>
> > it's easy to get good open source coders: it's much harder to find
> > good documentors who are willing to contribute to open source
> > projects. demand for good documentation is always high but supply is
> > typically low. i'm willi
i'd like incubator karma, please.
i plan to work on some of the documentation and progress an IP
clearance. (jim's had the software grant form for a few weeks now.)
cheers
- robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 3/9/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Craig McClanahan wrote:
> >
> >>My understanding of the incubator process is that the Incubator PMC still
> >>has to vote to accept a podling
> >
> > No. Although some people have expressed a desire that it be othe
On 3/9/06, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One of thing things that the we need to look at is how to improve
> > communication across projects. Perhaps having some ontological mailing
> > lists would be part of a solution.
> >
> > What ideas and views do others have?
>
> I know that m
On 3/10/06, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/9/06, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know that mailing-lists are part of the foundation of the ASF and
> > are a really useful way to communicate effectively. However my feeling
> > is that we don't have the right tools
On 3/10/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe we should subscribe all apache mail lists to one google account
> > and figure out how to have a web site proxy searches into it...
>
> You'd think Google would be enthusia
On 3/15/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > What makes a project with multiple codebases an umbrella is a gray
> > area.
>
> I've posted *my* first-pass definition of the term: a TLP that
> has no deliverable packages of it
On 3/15/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/15/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > would jakarta have been any less an umbrella if three years ago we'd started
> > rolling a huge jakarta.jar?
>
> Most likely, noone w
On 3/16/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > Ken wrote:
> > > I've posted *my* first-pass definition of the term: a TLP that
> > > has no deliverable packages of its own, only from its subprojects.
>
On 3/16/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >
> > > James Strachan wrote:
> > > > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > > > I know for a fact that WADI, ActiveIO and Trifork guys have
> > > > > been talking abou
On 3/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> > The conversation on OpenJPA has been quiet for about a week so I was
> > wondering if there are outstanding issues that need to be resolved or
> > this could be moved to a vote to accept the project and what the nex
please check
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-commons-composite-pool.html. i
will wait at 48 hours (no earlier than 1200 GMT on tuesday 21st march) for
objections before exporting the code from it's initial drop into the actual
codebase.
note that there is additional informatio
A few observations from following the process as currently documented
and proposals for improvements:
1 this process can only be executed by a ASF member or officer with
incubator karma. this needs to be documented on the clearance form.
PROPOSAL: document this and add section on form so that it'
On 3/19/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +0000, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > 3 there is no indication the form which CLA's and CCLA's are relevant.
> > this makes oversight difficult.
> >
> > PROPOSAL:
On 3/19/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2006, at 6:25 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > On 3/19/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin
> >> wrote:
>
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
> of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
> we won't be creating accounts by default - we'll need to have each
> person say "yes, I'm read
On 3/19/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/3/19, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The li
On 3/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A few observations from following the process as currently documented
> > and proposals for improvements:
> >
> > 1 this process
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
> >> of comm
On 3/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sorry for the confusion: this is about the actual process of preparing
> > the paperwork required by the incubator not the receipt of the
>
On 3/20/06, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I wanted to check what the time frame is for us to wait before
> getting nervous that a CLA was lost.
the question is how they were sent. FAX's are more reliable than post
from outside the US. it can take a few days to process CLAs.
AFAIK no objections lodged. proceeding.
- robert
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please check
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-commons-composite-pool.html.
> i will wait at 48 hours (no earlier than 1200 GMT on tuesday
the consensus on the previous thread was that it would be a good idea to
have a single directory where the tarballed code referred to in the grants
could be drop during IP clearance. this gives a canonical version of the
donation in a central location for later reference (if that's ever needed).
th
On 3/23/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > no one jumped in with a suggestion so unless anyone can come up with a
> > better location, i'm going to specify
> >
> > http
On 3/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/23/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > no one jumped in with a suggestion so unless anyone can come up with a
On 4/10/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/10/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/10/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > incubator? Then at least if the Incubator PMC are too busy to get
> > > involved on a particular project, folks from t
On 4/21/06, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/21/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > James, dude,
> > >
> > > *sigh*. I feel like a broken record these days.
> > >
> > > Nowhere do
On 4/21/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Incidentally there are useful bits of documentation on performing
> releases in the documentation/wikis of various projects at Apache.
> I've hacked up a quick wiki page to collect them..
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/general/ReleaseGuides
the
On 4/24/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/24/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > most of the questions raised are covered in the canonical documentation:
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. i'd
On 4/26/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:40:34AM -0600, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> > On 4/21/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > > *sigh*. I feel like a broken record these days.
> > > >
> > > > Nowhere does any poli
On 4/26/06, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Approval didn't happen within a reasonable time frame. I'm assuming lazy
consensus. We're going to continue with the process.
it's lazy concensus: but i don't think that's documented. i'll update the
documentation (unless anyone beats me
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 10:18 PM, RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Blockers?
---
"Are there IPR-related concerns with SAML (patents held by RSA but
offered royalty free)?"
Can you please elaborate more on this?
You never know, but t
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 07:08 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
we've see numerous cases recently about companies sitting on IPR and
then suddenly demanding money as soon as the technology has been widely
adopted.
these murky waters are muddied
were the IP issues ever resolved?
(if there are known IP claims against this technology and royalty-free
licenses are not available for apache and for the users of openSML, then
isn't this more than a little risky?)
- robert
On Wednesday, February 12, 2003, at 02:21 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
hi howard
i'm working on a 'how-to' document along these lines for jakarta-commons
releases at the moment. using the mirroring is just a little involved. you
also need an account on daedelus.
if tapestry is now in the apache CVS and the release is tagged, i could
probably reroll the release, s
i think that there's a bit more to do than that :)
here a brief run down of what i think's required. (i'm not claiming that
this is definitive.) whoever does this will require daedelus karma.
you need to sign and md5sum your releases (both binary and source, both
tar.gz) and zip. you need to cr
npack) the
necessary libraries and distributions and then use Ant to build Tapestry.
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 200
maybe some people on this list might be able to give good answers to Aslak'
s questions (they're at the bottom of the forwarded email).
- robert
Begin forwarded message:
From: Aslak Hellesøy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue Mar 25, 2003 01:54:42 PM Europe/London
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL
i've been pondering for a little while whether there's anything that might
be done to make it easier for would-be projects to meet up with potential
sponsors. even a page with suggestions about how to recruit a sponsor
might be better than nothing.
- robert
On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 09:10 P
(this is an attempt to explain rather than start another useless flame war.
..)
On Friday, July 4, 2003, at 12:24 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:22:10PM -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
The division of XML vs Jakarta predates me for certain, but I think the
main
issues surroundi
1 - 100 of 1415 matches
Mail list logo
