Welcome! The best place to start is
http://incubator.apache.org/geronimo. Join the developer mailing list,
get acquainted with the software, and find some work that needs to be
done. It's that easy; no resume is needed.
Regards,
Alan
> -Original Message-
> From: Octavian Tanase [mailt
+1
Many thanks to Geronimo's resident nudniks Geir and Noel.
> -Original Message-
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Geronimo from Incubator and recommend as
Bhanu,
The mailing lists can be found in
http://geronimo.apache.org/mail-lists.html
I'll fix the wiki.
Regards,
Alan
> -Original Message-
> From: Bhanu Vasireddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 7:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Geronimo J2EE project
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 1:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Agila] assigning tasks to groups of users
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On 8 Nov 2004, at 15:58, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >
> >> [EM
> ---
> [X] +1 I support this release and am willing to help
> [ ] +0 I support this release but am unable to help
> [ ] -0 I do not support this release
> [ ] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons
--
[X] Graduate the Directory Project
[ ] Abstain
[ ] Keep incubating the Directory Project
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dumb question, is it a requirement that the incubating project move to
the org.apache package?
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/21/2005 7:22 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Right now any PMC can automatically ok projects into incubator. How
about we change that rule? So that the only pmc that can approve a
proposal is the incubator PMC.
Without putting too much thought into my response I think that the
I
On 12/21/2005 3:13 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:59:11AM +, James Strachan wrote:
On 20 Dec 2005, at 19:33, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It's not actually a dumb question, but rather one that I always
took for granted... I realized when asked by Alan that we never
On 12/22/2005 10:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 22, 2005, at 12:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I do understand your point, but as I also understand from the
comments of
both the current ASF Chairman and his predecessor, the Incubator's
authority
comes into play when we vote to release f
On 12/21/2005 11:21 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 12/21/05, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ted Leung wrote:
On Dec 21, 2005, at 8:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I think that the incubation process is setting an incredibly
low bar for access to the Apache brand name
On 12/25/2005 6:03 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 13:00 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
Don't do a press release. An incubating project is not officially part
of the ASF, and a press release will imply that the project is part of
the ASF. This one really makes ASF membe
The software grant forms have been completed and sent to the Apache
Software Foundation. Can someone within ASF confirm that they have been
received?
The trademarks are in the process of being transferred. ETA for the
transfer is about one week.
Regards,
Alan
-
On 12/27/2005 9:17 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Dec 27, 2005, at 11:13 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
There has been some discussion on creating a Java specs project
which would hold all the specs jars from the various JSRs as well as
other standards, e.g. CORBA. Often, there are many
There has been some discussion on creating a Java specs project which
would hold all the specs jars from the various JSRs as well as other
standards, e.g. CORBA. Often, there are many duplicate "copies" of the
source code for the same JSR floating around in different Apache
projects. It would
On 12/27/2005 3:50 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 12/28/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, I've forwarded this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well so I can get
feedback from both sides. The above meant 'the commons community way'
rather than the exact people. ie) I'm expecting the origi
28/05, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would think that given its very nature, specs, the community would not
be very active at all.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-m
On 12/27/2005 4:25 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Discussion of upcoming specs, discussion of usage of the specs, a
users list that helps people use the specs (this is necessary, but
worries me about getting "how do I do servlets" type questions).
I guess there is also scope to innovate in addition to
On 12/27/2005 7:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 12/27/05, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems like an oxymoron, community should be active, but the code may
not, no? How can this be?
Two ways:
1) The conversation that Brett mentions. General pan-apache Java
thing
On 12/30/2005 6:54 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Dec 28, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 12/27/2005 4:25 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Discussion of upcoming specs, discussion of usage of the specs, a
users list that helps people use the specs (this is necessary, but
worries me
On 12/30/2005 10:18 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 12/30/05, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/30/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Reasons for not Jakarta:
*) Java specific.
I wonder why it has to be Java-specific ? Aren't there any standards
that conta
On 12/30/2005 10:29 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
2. There is no reason that I know of to restrict commit privileges on
the javax code to expert group members. The TCKs typically include
signature tests that verify that the interfaces and classes contain
exactly what they are supposed to.
I agr
Looks good to me.
Guys, should we not begin to create a specs project in Jakarta? It
seems that we have a consensus. What are the next steps?
Regards,
Alan
On 12/30/2005 6:14 AM, James Carman wrote:
Why not do like we do with the commons?
spec-javamail
-Original Message-
From
On 12/30/2005 1:27 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 12/30/05, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks good to me.
Guys, should we not begin to create a specs project in Jakarta? It
seems that we have a consensus.
Well, maybe ... I have a couple of concerns abo
On 12/31/2005 1:12 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
I haven't been involved in any history here, so please forgive my
naivete.
I think I understand the rationale for developing spec jars here at
Apache. Please correct me if I'm wrong. In order to use a spec jar
from the JCP, you have to click a li
On 1/1/2006 5:23 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 12/31/05, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't been involved in any history here, so please forgive my naivete.
I think I understand the rationale for developing spec jars here at Apache.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. In order t
On 1/2/2006 10:20 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
There are plenty of non-JCP specs, e.g. CORBA.
Do they have the same kind of "independent artifacts" like some of
these JCP specs do? I've been thinking about this too - what other
specs have a
+1 Release the binary as 4.0-M4
Regards,
Alan
On 1/30/2006 12:06 AM, James Strachan wrote:
On the developer list the committers voted to create a milestone
release of ActiveMQ...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-activemq-dev/
200512.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
then the committe
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 1/31/2006 7:43 AM:
-1
* The paperwork has not been recorded by the ASF Secretary.
If necessary, an ASF Officer can be used as an
intermediary, e.g., if Ken wants to accept and ACK a FAX,
we can operate on his ACK.
* I don't see a Software Grant for
Results of the vote [1] on Yoko - A CORBA Server sub-project proposal [2]:
+1 David Blevins
+1 Jacek Laskowski
+1 John Sisson
+1 Alan Cabrera
+1 Jeff Genender
+1 Davanum Srinivas
+1 Matt Hogstrom
+1 David Jencks
+1 Dain Sundstrom
+1 Bruce Snyder
+1 Greg Wilkins
+1 Jan Bartel
+1 Jason
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 1/31/2006 7:27 PM:
Alan,
Could you folks turn up some additional Mentors? We have not adopted a formal
policy to require more than one --- yet --- but I'd like to see more than one.
Sure, good idea.
Regards,
Alan
--
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote, On 2/1/2006 9:29 PM:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Snyder wrote:
Thank you very much for making us aware of this issue, Ken. I know
that it was a learning experience for me.
At any rate, I've fixed up the list of committers in each $projec
On 2/2/2006 8:57 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 7:29 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
How should the disclaimer be associated?
Well, this is a bit of an issue. Why are the plain jars
available? To
allow automated downloads by
If I understand correctly, this will be a code donation like
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/geronimo-762-ibm-console.html.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/2/2006 1:12 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Cory,
Could you please get James' help and draft a complete proposal?
Please see
http://www.goog
Are there risks to making this a TLP, i.e. do we know that there will be
enough traction to get it out of the incubator on its own? Wouldn't it
make sense to incubate it in an existing project and if the community
grows, graduated it to a TLP? I think that we've seen many TLP projects
strugg
Cc'ing the incubator list since Dims is no longer on the Geronimo and
ServiceMix lists.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/3/2006 2:05 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Holy crap! What a mess this thread is! I'm not used to being like
the cool voice of reason. :)
For my 2 cents, a JBI container without BPEL is a
On 1/31/2006 8:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 1/31/2006 7:27 PM:
Alan,
Could you folks turn up some additional Mentors? We have not adopted
a formal policy to require more than one --- yet --- but I'd like to
see more than one.
Sure, good idea.
The
On 2/7/2006 7:23 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 14:54 +0100, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
What happened to the "Starting a java specs project" thread?
Um, probably the same thing that happens to many threads- like a
firework .. goes up with heat, blows up in great colo
The requirement for iCLAs is pretty straightforward. What is the rule
for requiring CCLAs? How do I, on the Apache side, perform due
diligence? Do I just point the candidates to the license page and ask
them to carefully read the material?
Regards,
Alan
Noel,
I think that these issues have now been addressed. I have gathered up
the information from subsequent replies in this thread below.
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 1/31/2006 7:43 AM:
-1
* The paperwork has not been recorded by the ASF Secretary.
If necessary, an ASF Officer can be u
On 2/5/2006 2:32 PM, David N. Welton wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
*) IP clearance checklist - I need to make a copy of that in SVN here,
/incubator/site-author/ip-clearance. I'll try and get that done over
the weekend.
Ok, I added /incubator/site-author/ip-clearance/ofbiz.xml - althou
I think I need:
* SVN
o http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko
* Jira
* Mailing lists
o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Alan
On 2/8/2006 5:16 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
The only person who's stepped up and volunteered is Geir. Is there
anyone else? Are two mentors enough?
I'm there also.
Yep. Thanks Ken!
Regards,
Alan
On 2/8/2006 5:50 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan,
Please note that this is not a Geronimo sub-project. Incubator projects are
just that: Incubator projects whose final destination will be determined at
graduation.
Amongst other issues, we want to be inviting and inclusive of whomever wants
On 2/8/2006 5:41 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think I need:
* SVN
o http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko
* Jira
* Mailing lists
o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 2/8/2006 7:27 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
ALL incubator requests for infrastructure MUST be reflected in an
appropriate status file under
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
before they are requested. There are no exceptions.
Roy
I shall do this.
Regards,
Alan
-
On Feb 8, 2006, at 2:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Noel,
I think that these issues have now been addressed. I have gathered
up the information from subsequent replies in this thread below.
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 1/31/2006 7:43 AM:
-1
* The paperwork has not been recorded by the ASF Se
On 2/13/2006 11:04 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The all of the links on http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
index.html seem to be broken. I'll try to figure out what is wrong,
but if someone has an idea or is already working on it, please let me
know.
Fixed and released.
Regards,
Al
On 2/13/2006 6:43 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Sybase wants to donate to the service-mix community
In other words, they *don't* want to contribute it to Apache.
They want it to go into a specific and particular niche *at*
Apache. Why the specificity? Why d
On 2/13/2006 6:26 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan,
* I have no problem with the tarballs, but the plain jars do
not have the disclaimer associated with them.
Any current user of ActiveMQ will have to modify their Maven project
descriptor to change the groupId of activemq to
Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
Please feel free to comment.
Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
faxed in?
Any other ASF committers want to jump
Done. Feel free to amend.
Regards,
Alan
Davanum Srinivas wrote, On 2/15/2006 2:15 PM:
Welcome aboard
Alan, James,
Could you please update the wiki proposal?
thanks,
dims
On 2/15/06, Ismael Ghalimi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good afternoon,
My name is Ismael Ghalimi, and I am the CEO
t and become actively
involved.
Bill Flood Sybase [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/14/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
Please feel free to comment.
Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase deve
IIUC, you must be a made man to be a mentor.
Regards,
Alan
Paul Fremantle wrote, On 2/17/2006 1:26 AM:
Folks
I have added myself in the wiki as a mentor and committer. I hope thats ok
with everyone.
Paul
On 2/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
really. I thought he was jo
cory wrote, On 2/17/2006 9:05 AM:
Hello All,
An Ode Apache licensed tarball is available at:
ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/ode-src.tar.gz
The grant was faxed in on 2/9. The package name is org.apache.ode,
all the source files have an Apache license and an Apache LICENSE file
is i
I've placed a tentative version of the proposal up onto the incubator site.
The Software Grant has been received.
There is obviously a lot of good discussion that still needs to take
place. I think we should move this to the new mailing lists.
I think that we need to create:
- mailing lists
Davanum Srinivas wrote, On 2/17/2006 12:01 PM:
Hmm...Can we apply the same criteria to *ALL* committers (including
those listed in the status page now?)
One more question, Since Noel (as the PMC Chair) talked about
Incubator pmc sponsoring this, can we please reflect that and ask for
a ppmc mail
Sorry, that's what I meant. What are the domains for the lists?
Davanum Srinivas wrote, On 2/17/2006 1:19 PM:
harmony-ppmc...Also dont' forget to change the domains for the lists..
-- dims
On 2/17/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote, On 2/
Davanum Srinivas wrote, On 2/17/2006 1:49 PM:
Alan,
I've set up the following.
Mailing listdev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailing listcommits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailing listppmc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug trackingJIRA http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE
Source code SVN
On 2/17/2006 9:26 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
IIUC, you must be a made man to be a mentor.
Actually, Paul is on the Incubator PMC, so he's on the Ode PPMC, and has
chosen to actively participate. ASF Members are automatically eligible for
the PMC, others, such as Paul, are elected.
D
On 2/17/2006 8:12 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 11:42 -0800, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
One thing that should be resolved as soon as possible is how we will
bring in new members. At the moment there are 17 proposed new
committers for a total of 37 committers. I think
On 2/18/2006 10:24 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
[X] is on the Incubator PMC, so he's on the Ode PPMC, and has
chosen to actively participate. ASF Members are automatically
eligible for he PMC, others [can be] elected.
Jacopo Cappellato wrote, On 2/18/2006 10:44 PM:
Hi all,
just a side note...
I've noticed that the projects recently accepted into the Incubator (Ode
and Yoko) have been added to the top of the list of "Currently in
incubation" projects (http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html).
I thi
Craig McClanahan wrote, On 2/18/2006 11:46 PM:
On 2/18/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
OT: I dislike the current trend of people using +1, -1, for simple
conversations. It confuses people and should be reserved for votes.
The use of +1/
On 2/22/2006 7:39 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Grand Central, a home for Java Specs.
I'd suggest that we just use Jakarta for this purpose. And I don't believe
that we need anything more than a map, and a package distribution point.
What about the issue w/ project names in jars, e.g.
On 2/22/2006 8:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 2/22/2006 7:39 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Grand Central, a home for Java Specs.
I'd suggest that we just use Jakarta for this purpose. And I don't
believe
that we need anything more than a map, and a package distribu
On 2/23/2006 9:16 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2006 15:46, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Why not just modify incubator procedure to make it clear that
1) Mentors make the requests and
2) They sign the email w/ the title "$PODLING_NAME Mentor"
Now #2
I think that Yoko is good to go.
ASF Infra has set up the mailing lists, SVN, and created accounts for
our new committers as well as adding the existing interested ASF
committers to the proper Unix group. I will notify the new committers
of their new accounts. There are some stragglers and t
On 2/23/2006 11:32 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
One question, do we need a PPMC? I think that we should start one
since this project has a very real possibility of becoming a TLP.
It's not really a matt
Where are we with this vote?
Can we form the PPMC?
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alan D. Cabrera wrote, On 2/23/2006 12:59 PM:
On 2/23/2006 11:32 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
One question, do we need a PPMC? I think that we should start one
since this project has a very real possibility of
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
ASF projects are supposed to be about a community managing a project. So
the warning signs include large disjoint communities, e.g., Jakarta, the old
XML project (which, itself, was a Jakarta spin-off), etc.
So, good project boundaries are considered to be administrative
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
Mhmm, I have one major problem with this (as much as with Cayenne),
and this is that IMO we (will) have too much ORM engines in Apache
(with JPA and Cayenne it will be 6 or 7 ?) with little to no
cooperation (esp. on the code level) between the ones already here. So
in short
+1: Jim Jagielski, Noel J. Bergman, Davanum Srinivas, Paul Fremantle
0: none
-1: none
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IIUC, they all contributed code to the AMQ project.
Regards,
Alan
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
What i'd be interested to know is how many of the 17 Non-Apache
Committers noted on the proposal[1] got Apache id's and of them how
many of them actually made any commits to the Apache SVN repo.
[1] http
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
-- Once established, the PPMC shall
-- work to make sure that the other resources
are put into place.
- -0. Mentor's job, not a PPMC one.
While I think that the mentors should be ultimately responsible for
this, it
I'm curious, how does one get into the Incubator PMC?
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 3/14/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm resurrecting the thread that fell off into /dev/null after
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200603.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
So this sentence in
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
This is not a vote, but simply a discussion about the graduation of
ActiveMQ from the Incubator.
Personally, I do not consider ActiveMQ ready. And I do believe that it
should be targeting TLP status. It has its own community, is
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I'm curious, how does one get into the Incubator PMC?
It's open to all members now with a simple ping - ack - short wait cycle.
All members interested in contributing to this effort are welcomed if
they
would help provide the men
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 3/15/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a concern about item 2. It has been my experience that the Incubator
PMC can be a bit tardy in replying to emails. May I suggest that the 72 hour
window starts w/ item 1? Given that, then item 2
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
So, ASF corporate members can become members. That fits in with my
understanding as well since, IIUC, ASF corporate members can join any
PMC that they wish.
Correct. Although the
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Alan,
There is something going on that i can't really put my finger on.
- The large # of committers who don't really commit
This is a perennial issue w/ incubation, IIRC. Do we give commit to all
original committers and take it away from inactive ones or do we go
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
What other issues are there?
A number of infrastucture issues. Votes from the Incubator PMC and Geronimo
PMC. To do that responsibly, I'd say that we would want to see communities
having demonstrated that they understand how to practice a
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I only see infrastructure issues in your list of concerns
that would prevent the graduation of ActiveMQ.
Look again, but also at comments from Dims, Henri and others.
At the moment, only Dims has taken the time to enumerate a list of
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 3/15/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
- The presence of ActiveCluster/ActiveIO which were separate projects
in codehaus (is the active cluster code inside the milestone? i don't
see a separate jar).
Th
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henri Yandell wrote:
Interesting reply - I'd been assuming that when an incubatee graduates
into an existing project, it's PPMC automatically get added to the
PMC. So I was a bit confused as to why Noel was even aski
This is my understanding as well and what was communicated to me by
Incubator PMC people.
Regards,
Alan
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
I think he is talking about having/needing a separate download for
ServiceMix irrespective of whether an incubating jar is in Geronimo or
not.
Basically if one nee
James Strachan wrote:
On 3/16/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan/James dredged up a thought process which i want to ask all of you
about.
For a concrete example, I know for a fact that WADI, ActiveIO and
Trifork guys have been talking about coming up with a single framework
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, James Strachan wrote:
BTW we are currently calling all the artifacts incubator-activemq-*,
the jars are all called incubator-activemq*.jar, we include
disclaimers in the distro highlighting the incubator status and also
include these inside the manife
James Strachan wrote, On 3/30/2006 5:46 AM:
On 3/30/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
ERROR BrokerService - Failed to start ActiveMQ JMS
Message Broker. Reason: java.io.EOFException
java.io.EOFException
at java.io.DataInput
I believe that these forms were sent in a while back. Has this been
accepted and signed by the ASF?
Regards,
Alan
--
Alan D. Cabrera
VP Engineering
Simula Labs - The Open Source Venture Partners
p: +1 510 225 5588 f: +1 800 822 0471
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.simulalabs.com
Great. Thanks. Should LogicBlaze get a copy of the signed document?
Regards,
Alan
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 4/7/2006 7:30 AM:
Yes, it appears so from the trademark-assigns.txt file. On or before February
18th.
--- Noel
-Original Message-
From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto
assignment the day it was logged in the file (Feb 3rd).
On Apr 7, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Great. Thanks. Should LogicBlaze get a copy of the signed document?
Regards,
Alan
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 4/7/2006 7:30 AM:
Yes, it appears so from the trademark-assigns.txt file. On or
Sounds good. Many thanks!
Regards,
Alan
Jim Jagielski wrote, On 4/10/2006 7:50 AM:
It was sent via postal mail. I can make another copy
and send it out. Most likely later on this week.
On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:17 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Thanks Jim. It seems that LogicBlaze may have
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 28, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Jordan Zimmerman
wrote:
> Please cast your vote:
> [ ] +1 Graduate the Apache Curator podling from Apache Incubator as a TLP
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the graduation status of Apache Curator podling
> [ ] -1 Reject graduation of Apache Curator podl
uciano Resende
> Mahadev Konar
> Ioannis Canellos
> Henry Saputra
> Ashish Paliwal
> Ant Elder
> Andrei Savu
> Alan D. Cabrera
> Evaristo Josec
>
> +0 (none)
>
> -1 (none)
>
> I will send an email to the
Are we voting?
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 4, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> +1 binding
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Sent from phone
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I'd like to
Congrats!
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 5, 2013, at 5:54 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> The IPMC has VOTEd to add Jake Farrell as an Apache Incubator PMC.
>
> Welcome Jake!
>
> --David
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: genera
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> [ ] +1 Accept Storm into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't accept Storm because...
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
1 - 100 of 491 matches
Mail list logo
