Looks good to me.
Guys, should we not begin to create a specs project in Jakarta? It
seems that we have a consensus. What are the next steps?
Regards,
Alan
On 12/30/2005 6:14 AM, James Carman wrote:
Why not do like we do with the commons?
spec-javamail
-----Original Message-----
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 9:08 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Starting a java specs project
On 12/27/05, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I think this would be great! I know it's silly, but I get annoyed at
the fact that many of the J2EE spec jars that I use from apache have
"geronimo-" in the jar name but It's just the ASL 2.0 spec jars that
I'm using and not really a geronimo implementation. In general, I
think that this would make a good TLP since it would provide a good
area for cross project involvement.
[presuming it was stored at Jakarta Specs]
Do you think they should be apache-xxxx or jakarta-xxxx, or either
would be fine?
Would 'jakarta-spec-javamail' be too much of a mouthful?
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
