Henri Yandell wrote:
On 3/15/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
- The presence of ActiveCluster/ActiveIO which were separate projects
in codehaus (is the active cluster code inside the milestone? i don't
see a separate jar).
These are two small libraries used in AMQ that don't warrant their own
project. The original founders of those projects had big aspirations at
the time they were formed at the CodeHaus a few years back. If they had
known what was in store for their future, maybe it would have been done
differently. Hindsight is 20/20 I guess.
- The lack of discussion on say the OpenWire stuff. I see one status
email[1] that's it. the other 26 people don't seem to have any opinion
on it. Are people talking offline?
OpenWire has been around for a long time, way before incubation, so most
of the development issues were worked out a long time ago. You'll see
bursts of traffic about it as people add new language bindings.
However, I see a lot of discussion about it this month. A large bulk
of the communication on the AMQ list is about OpenWire C/C++.
Sorry to harp on a bit more with generic opinions that may or may not apply :)
A 3-deep umbrella is another warning sign. I've found that the
subprojects of subprojects are much harder for a PMC to maintain
oversight over - given that they can't have sub-PMCs as such would be
an example of redundant foundationing. Over the time many of the PMC
don't even know that they exist.
Good point but I'm not sure that it applies here. OpenWire is an
architectural component of AMQ.
Regards,
Alan
