On 12/30/2005 10:18 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 12/30/05, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/30/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Reasons for not Jakarta:
*) Java specific.
I wonder why it has to be Java-specific ? Aren't there any standards
that contains bindings for several languages ?
Good point. I originally meant that if we wanted specs from other
languages to be there, Jakarta wouldn't make sense. However for
something like SAX or DOM, it's less about another language spec and
more about a cross-language spec.
No idea to be honest. If we go with Jakarta or JCP as a location; I
think we just treat them as exceptions to be dealt with.
I think that we're over thinking this. Let's start w/ Java and cross
the multi-language issue bridge when we come to it.
Regards,
Alan
