[jira] [Created] (FLEX-33232) Loop video property adding delay between repetitions

Neogene created FLEX-33232: -- Summary: Loop video property adding delay between repetitions Key: FLEX-33232 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33232 Project: Apache Flex Issue Type: Bug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC9

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Om wrote: > ...*Please vote to approve this release:*... +1 to release the source archives: MD5 (apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-incubating-src.zip) = 2d3c8768dac6ebd887f2a6b6aff1ef15 MD5 (apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.8-incubating-src.tar.gz) = 415d70d5447aefad2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0 - RC9

Bertrand, The README notes that you need to modify the path to the Flex SDK in the build properties file or provide it via the command line. The path you see here is the typical place the Flex SDK is found on a Mac. There is absolutely no requirement to have Flash Builder installed. Once you fi

Re: About Flex runtime

I tried twice from yesterday to checkout de develop branch, once on my computer at work, on at me, in both cases, after compiling the sdk, I tried to run the tests and had that: $ sh mini_run.sh tests/components/Label Skipping testcase check Doing a regular mini run Buildfile: U:\asf\flex\sdk\d

Re: About Flex runtime

In SwfLoaderTestAdapter, it should be "compm.compile(loader_mxml_file, new ArrayList(Arrays.asList(args)));" instead of "compm.compile(loader_mxml_file, args);" because the compile method of CompileMxmlUtils is defined like that "public void compile(String mxml,ArrayList optionalArgs) throws Ex

Re: About Flex runtime

So, now I can compile mustella but the tests with FP 10.3 still fails, I tried to use ImageDiffAIR but the file is damaged, I tried to use ImageDiff too but it has some bugs, one when I ckicked on compare: TypeError: Error #1009: Il est impossible d'accéder à la propriété ou à la méthode d'une

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

That's not exactly true. They said their focus was gaming and premium video. The side effects of them focusing on those aspects /may/ help us. Generally speaking, the new VM will not help us in the short-term. -Nick On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:50 PM, sébastien Paturel wrote: > Yes thanks, but w

Re: About Flex runtime

You are correct. I wonder why we didn't hit this earlier? I will make this change. On 10/26/12 4:55 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > In SwfLoaderTestAdapter, it should be "compm.compile(loader_mxml_file, new > ArrayList(Arrays.asList(args)));" instead of > "compm.compile(loader_mxml_file, args);

Re: About Flex runtime

ImageDiff works as long as both sides have an image that is the same size. For ImageDiffAIR, did you open the .air file and install it? You can't just run the ImageDiffAIR.swf since it is an AIR app. What error did you get? On 10/26/12 5:51 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > So, now I can compil

Re: About Flex runtime

That looks like it was related to a change I made to get spaces-in-paths to work for Mustella. I modified CompileMxmUtils to take ArrayList as an argument, but none of the builds I did ran into this. Very strange. Thanks for making the correction Alex. --peter On 10/26/12 11:00 AM, "Alex Harui"

Re: About Flex runtime

I tried to install the air app and had in french a message saying the file was damage. For ImageDiff, i'm still trying to get why I've got this error -Message d'origine- From: Alex Harui Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 5:05 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: About Flex r

Re: About Flex runtime

In imageDiff.mxml, there's public function compareBitmaps():void { init(); ... } The init() function doesn't exist but there is a initLC() function -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 5:13 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apa

Re: About Flex runtime

ImageDiff is old and hasn't been maintained. Let's try to get ImageDiffAIR to work. Try building it yourself from sources. On 10/26/12 8:19 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > In imageDiff.mxml, there's > > public function compareBitmaps():void > { > > init(); > ...

Re: About Flex runtime

Already did but I don't know how to interpret the informations, it looks like the 2 images haven't got the same size -Message d'origine- From: Alex Harui Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 5:33 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: About Flex runtime ImageDiff is old and hasn'

Re: About Flex runtime

Actually, both are the same size but are not show up with same dimensions in the air app, I don't know how to interpret the result but the bad image is 8 bytes bigger than the good one. -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 5:43 PM To: flex-dev@incub

Re: About Flex runtime

On 10/26/12 8:43 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > Already did but I don't know how to interpret the informations, it looks > like the 2 images haven't got the same size That is possible, but then the console output for that test should have said something like: compare returned -3 or comp

Re: About Flex runtime

Here attached are 2 examples. -Message d'origine- From: Alex Harui Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 6:00 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: About Flex runtime On 10/26/12 8:43 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: Already did but I don't know how to interpret the informations,

[jira] [Created] (FLEX-33233) Mustella tests failed with FP10.3

Frédéric THOMAS created FLEX-33233: -- Summary: Mustella tests failed with FP10.3 Key: FLEX-33233 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33233 Project: Apache Flex Issue Type: Test

Re: About Flex runtime

Please send them directly to me at aha...@adobe.com. I think attachments get stripped on the mailing list. It may be a couple of hours before I get to it, so don't wait up if it is after hours for you. On 10/26/12 9:02 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > Here attached are 2 examples. > > > -M

[jira] [Updated] (FLEX-33233) Mustella tests failed with FP10.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frédéric THOMAS updated FLEX-33233: --- Attachment: textIndent_negative_Style_Label_Spark.png.bad.png textIndent_negat

Re: About Flex runtime

I just open an issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33233# -Message d'origine- From: Alex Harui Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 6:07 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: About Flex runtime Please send them directly to me at aha...@adobe.com. I think attachments

Re: About Flex runtime

Peter, Yes, it's weird that hasn't been discover before, would it be worthy to run mustalla tests once again with a version of the sdk in 10.3 and one in 11.1 as it would as well confirm or not my results that the tests are broken ? -Message d'origine- From: Peter Ent Sent: Friday,

Re: About Flex runtime

Hi, When you say, "a version of the sdk in 10.3 and one in 11.1", I'm not exactly sure what you mean. As far as I can tell from README in the Apache Flex download, we are only targeting Flash Player 11.1, although 11.3 will probably work as well since I've used that at one time or other. Mustella

RE: compc config adjustements (was RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon)

What's the status of this work? Do we have a config file for framework.swc yet that I can use in a Falcon JUnit test? If so, I'd like to get it checked in even if we don't switch over the build.xml file yet to use it. - Gordon -Original Message- From: Chema Balsas [mailto:jbal...@gmail

Re: About Flex runtime

Alex, Well, I guess I understand now how ImageDiff works and it seems that the differences are just in edges of the glyphs as you mentioned it. Then, what's next ? how to make the tests pass ? -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 6:09 PM To: flex-

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

There are still some features of AS3 that aren't supported in Jangaroo (I think namespaces are a big missing feature), but they did manage to get most things working. If you look at the compiled code for Jangaroo, they didn't do as much of a 1:1 mapping to JS as other compilers try to do, they

Re: About Flex runtime

Apache Flex is suppose to support Flash Player from 10.3 to 11.1, that's the reason why I built and test one version with the playerglobal 10.3 and ran the test with FP 10.3 -Message d'origine- From: Peter Ent Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 7:30 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Su

[jira] [Resolved] (FLEX-33110) Building the SDK with Java 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carol Frampton resolved FLEX-33110. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Adobe Flex SDK Next Completed with rev 1402596 (plus

Re: compc config adjustements (was RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon)

On 10/26/12 1 :35PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote: >What's the status of this work? Do we have a config file for >framework.swc yet that I can use in a Falcon JUnit test? If so, I'd like >to get it checked in even if we don't switch over the build.xml file yet >to use it. It doesn't look like it is do

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33110) Building the SDK with Java 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13485078#comment-13485078 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33110: --- Note that on a Mac, you will need an Intel

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33226) Convert sdk project compile targets to include flex-config format xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13485079#comment-13485079 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33226: --- Please add the Apache header to the new fil

Re: About Flex runtime

To be more precise, Justin Mclean did modifications to make the build no more dependant of one unique version of flash player / globalplayer, which is nice but has to be tested, if the differences are only in the edges of the glyphs because we haven't the images from others versions (if it's the

Re: compc config adjustements (was RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon)

Hi, I spent a day getting all things in order(sdk build etc), I'm new to this stuff. I spent yesterday morning trying to understand the tests which almost crashed my computer. Since this is in my spare time at the moment, I can't get to it right off. If I was to do this with having time t

Re: About Flex runtime

On 10/26/12 10:45 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > Apache Flex is suppose to support Flash Player from 10.3 to 11.1, Well, actually, we don't know. The official release is only known to work with 11.1. Since then, Justin found that Flex compiles with Player 10.3 and seemed to work, but now tha

Re: compc config adjustements (was RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon)

Hi, I'll have time to work on this tomorrow. I'll fix the ones I already sent that are missing the apache headers and submit as many of the others as possible following Gordon's preferences. El viernes, 26 de octubre de 2012, Michael Schmalle escribió: > Hi, > > I spent a day getting all things

[jira] [Resolved] (FLEX-33230) Config file for frameworks/projects/spark

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carol Frampton resolved FLEX-33230. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Apache Flex Next Assignee: Carol Frampton Au

[jira] [Created] (FLEX-33234) CLONE - Config file for frameworks/projects/spark

Carol Frampton created FLEX-33234: - Summary: CLONE - Config file for frameworks/projects/spark Key: FLEX-33234 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33234 Project: Apache Flex Issu

[jira] [Deleted] (FLEX-33234) CLONE - Config file for frameworks/projects/spark

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carol Frampton deleted FLEX-33234: -- > CLONE - Config file for frameworks/projects/spark >

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33226) Convert sdk project compile targets to include flex-config format xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13485176#comment-13485176 ] Carol Frampton commented on FLEX-33226: --- Did textLayout and core compile targets.

[jira] [Reopened] (FLEX-33230) Config file for frameworks/projects/spark

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carol Frampton reopened FLEX-33230: --- Reopening since bundle still needs to be done. > Config file for frameworks/pr

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

Hi Sebastien, Just to confirm. What this means is that you guys will be able to run Flex apps in the Flash Player in the next 5 years, same for AIR by using captive runtime. Again, to make things clear, this will possible cause you guys will be targeting AS3 and AS3 APIs. To target ASNext and the

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

Thibault, Does this mean when people download Flash Player when ASNext is released... that they will be installing a 'package' that will run AS2, AS3, and ASNext content? Some detail about the anticipated deployment strategy of ASNext would be helpful for us to understand what the ultimate lif

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

Hi Rick, Nope, think about when AS3 was introduced. Did your AS2 applications stopped working? No. Same thing here ;) We will share more about ASNext next year. I brought that up cause wanted to let you know guys the direction and set the right expectations. I hope that it is helpful. Thibault I

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

When Flash Player 9 introduced AS3 and a whole new set of object models, FP 9 then came with different ASVMs that targeted AS3 and the AS2, and the experience was seamless. The Flash Players today maintain such backward compatibility. Unless Adobe has changed the philosophy of excellent backward

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

Thibault, This sucks, this is such a cliff hanger! I will have to wait till next year? :) Tangent -- Original Message -- Received: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 05:36:43 PM EDT From: Thibault Imbert To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Subject: Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon > Hi Rick, > > Nope, think a

five years... or less?

I may be stating the obvious, but it's starting to bother me when I hear people quote Adobe's 'five year' promise as if it happened yesterday. Everyone needs to embrace the notion that the clock is already ticking... which means we have less than five years left. In fact, it would be a good idea

[jira] [Created] (FLEX-33235) mx.utils.PopUpUtil

Pablo Beltran created FLEX-33235: Summary: mx.utils.PopUpUtil Key: FLEX-33235 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33235 Project: Apache Flex Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions:

Re: five years... or less?

I don't recall any new versions of Flash Player breaks old contents created years ago, but I remember Microsoft's own Silverlight contents errored out in newer version of Silverlight. I wonder if anyone else has experienced disruption with FP upgrade. Tangent -- Original Message -- Recei

Re: five years... or less?

Flash Player 9.0.124 ... the security update caused some ripples. Also the the 10.x UIA requirement. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/fplayer10_uia_requirements.html It's possible - just depends on the features you use. On Friday, October 26, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Tianzhen Lin wrot

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

If I read that correctly; the only way to support AS3 AIR Apps will be to use Captive Runtime? On 10/26/2012 5:04 PM, Thibault Imbert wrote: Hi Sebastien, Just to confirm. What this means is that you guys will be able to run Flex apps in the Flash Player in the next 5 years, same for AIR by

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

Yes, correct. And this is what most people have been using lately with AIR so that they don't depend on a required runtime. All the dependencies are embedded. Thibault Imbert | sr. product manager gaming (Graphics, Language, VM, Compiler) | Monocle | adobe systems gaming.adobe.com

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

On 10/26/2012 6:56 PM, Thibault Imbert wrote: Yes, correct. And this is what most people have been using lately with AIR so that they don't depend on a required runtime. All the dependencies are embedded. I'm not clear if I understand all the possible implications of this. From this thread,

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

Thibault, Do you know of Adobe's plans to support those of us who are using Captive Runtimes, but when major bugs are introduced, for example the GPS bug that was introduced with iOS 5? I realize that Captive Runtime helps us control our dependencies, but for bugs that are still to be discovered,

Re: About Flex runtime

Well, I am able to reproduce the issue when I run 10.3. I will have to verify that these tests are set up properly. On 10/26/12 11:29 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 10/26/12 10:45 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > >> Apache Flex is suppose to support Flash Player from 10.3 to 11.1, > Wel

Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

Hi Jeff, Yes, this is correct. Thibault Imbert | sr. product manager gaming (Graphics, Language, VM, Compiler) | Monocle | adobe systems gaming.adobe.com | bytearray.org | @thibault_imbert On 10/26/12 4:02 PM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote: >On 1

Re: About Flex runtime

Looks like 10.3 chooses antialiasing differently than 11.1. We will have to find a way to compensate in Mustella if we're going to officialy allow different versions. On 10/26/12 4:15 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Well, I am able to reproduce the issue when I run 10.3. I will have to > verify tha

Re: About Flex runtime

Hi, > Looks like 10.3 chooses antialiasing differently than 11.1. Any idea about more recent versions greater than 11.1? I guess that's probably more important than getting all test to pass in 10.3. Thanks, Justin

Re: About Flex runtime

Both the extremes are important IMO and for sure I'll test with the 11.4 as well and even air 3.4 -Message d'origine- From: Justin Mclean Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 2:19 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: About Flex runtime Hi, Looks like 10.3 chooses antialiasi

Re: About Flex runtime

Did you notice as well that between the trunk and the develop branch, on label at least, 2 tests were missing ? -Message d'origine- From: Alex Harui Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 1:15 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: About Flex runtime Well, I am able to reproduce

Re: About Flex runtime

On 10/26/12 5:19 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > >> Looks like 10.3 chooses antialiasing differently than 11.1. > > Any idea about more recent versions greater than 11.1? I guess that's probably > more important than getting all test to pass in 10.3. Haven't tried any other players. It w

Re: About Flex runtime

Alex, Is there a JIRA ticket for this? Can you please create one with the requirements for testing? I can create sub-tasks for each flash player version we want to test. That would make it easier for the community to take them up one by one. Justin, what would be best way to enable testing on d

Re: About Flex runtime

Hi, > Justin, what would be best way to enable testing on different player > versions on Jenkins? Currently the Jenkin's setup can't handle running Mustella. I tried a while back but got nowhere (the job just hangs when it run the flash player). Even if we did manage to get it to work there's on

Re: About Flex runtime

On 10/26/12 10:08 PM, "Om" wrote: > Alex, > > Is there a JIRA ticket for this? A JIRA ticket for what? There is a ticket for the 10.3 failures. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui