Hi Jeff, Yes, this is correct.
Thibault Imbert | sr. product manager gaming (Graphics, Language, VM, Compiler) | Monocle | adobe systems gaming.adobe.com <http://gaming.adobe.com/> | bytearray.org <http://bytearray.org/> | @thibault_imbert On 10/26/12 4:02 PM, "Jeffry Houser" <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: >On 10/26/2012 6:56 PM, Thibault Imbert wrote: >> Yes, correct. And this is what most people have been using lately with >>AIR >> so that they don't depend on a required runtime. All the dependencies >>are >> embedded. > > I'm not clear if I understand all the possible implications of this. > From this thread, I understand that Adobe is working on a new Virtual >Machine and a new version of ActionScript. > Presumably, Adobe's focus moving forward will be on those two things. > Does this mean, that AS3 apps will, potentially, be limited from >accessing/using new Player APIs? > >-- >Jeffry Houser >Technical Entrepreneur >203-379-0773 >-- >http://www.flextras.com?c=104 >UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! >-- >http://www.theflexshow.com >http://www.jeffryhouser.com >http://www.asktheflexpert.com >-- >Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust >
