I've used both FDT and IntelliJ. I use IntelliJ for my development 95% of
the time now, switching to Eclipse for some obscure tool that requires it
(AWS Beanstalk deployment, Android Tools, etc). I know a lot of people who
like and use FDT, but for me, I had nothing but licensing issues and slow
I don't see why our binary distributions would be a problem to host
anywhere... The added stuff the installer downloads -- we can't host
those, but the binary stuff should be ok.
I know that the people at Spoon have offered to host them. Want me to ping
them if it becomes a problem?
-Nick
On T
Wouldn't we want to keep the config file on our website / SVN? It seems to
me that placing the config file on any of the DISTS would be disasterious,
as this contains the MD5 checksum that the app verifies to make sure the
release wasn't tampered by the dist...
What are the thoughts on doing vers
I'm around for most of today, and should be able to build it for you.
-Nick
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:45 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> I am ready to put out an RC1 for voting. I need a committer with a Mac to
> build and sign a .dmg file for the Mac installer. In case, you have not
> built
Thanks!
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski
> wrote:
> > ...Name: Nick Kwiatkowski
> > Email: que...@apache.org
>
> Added to the flex-committers confluence group.
>
> -Bertrand
>
Bertrand,
Can you check my account as well? I put a request here a few weeks ago
requesting access, and I don't think it was done.
Name: Nick Kwiatkowski
Email: que...@apache.org
Thanks!
-Nick
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Justin,
Did you already open up a ticket with infra to get that looked at?
-Nick
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Still to do:
> 1. Place release in correct location ie /dist not /dist/incubation (OK
> for now I think)
> 2. Official announcement to various lists
I agree. In all honesty, any announcement will get lost between now and
next Tuesday anyway.
-Nick
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Om wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2012 5:43 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I will try to work on the installer v2 RC very soon.
> >
> > I forgot we will h
Just uploading to the SVN is not enough to make it go on the staging server
-- you still have to run the update script.
Either way, I'll push it to production now. Thanks!
-Nick
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> > Did you push those changes in the CMS?
> No I was waiting
ut to my knowledge the 'interface' in the
> > > XML file hasn't been altered, so the change I indicated will need to
> > > implemented anyway.
> > >
> > > EdB
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:2
ne:
>
> path="incubator/flex/4.8.0-incubating/binaries/"
> file="apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-bin.zip" />
>
> Needs to be updated to point to the latest SDK. That should be enough
> to update both the Installer and InstallerBadge functionality.
>
> EdB
&
f the SDK installer is good to go as well? Is there anything
we need to do to get that page on the website updated?
-Nick
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> Did you push those changes in the CMS? I don't see them on the staging
> server yet. I do see the
Did you push those changes in the CMS? I don't see them on the staging
server yet. I do see them in SVN, though. I can take care of that for
you, if you wish.
-Nick
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've added some information to the web site for the 4.9 release,
I'm getting the same error at the moment. It is possible that something is
screwed up at Apache's SVN again. I get this error every few weeks for a
few hours.
-Nick
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone be kind enough to run this from the base of a clean
+1
See remarks in Discuss thread.
-Nick
Sorry, according to GMail, I did. I'll try again.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Nick,
>
> Please vote in the [VOTE] thread (not the [DISCUSS] thread).
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
> On 12/24/12 7:32 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrot
+1
Was able to build from source with no issues on Win7 + Java7. No issues
with the ANT script. Output created my AIR projects as expected.
Was able to use the binaries with no issues on Win7. No issues with the
outputs.
Non-blocking -- Noticed that the URL in the samples\themes\README.txt sti
Windows 7, tested RC6 with the binary distro and from building it from
source. I'll give RC7 a whirl tomorrow if I get a chance before heading
out for the holiday.
-Nick
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I didn't verify the RAT or that jazz, but the source and b
I didn't verify the RAT or that jazz, but the source and binary builds seem
good. My last-minute-check of my projects seem good.
-Nick
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I saw your checkin. I agree that is the right thing to do. I ran ant main
> release and rat is clean.
Yahoo!
Thanks for all the hard work everybody! Good luck to Alex to steer this
herd of cats (us) in the right direction as our new VP :)
-Nick
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Justin Mclean >wrote:
>
> > We're out of incubation! Congra
42 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> I don't think we should mention the flex.apache.org URL yet. Even if we
> do graduate this evening, the infrastructure team will take some time to
> setup the new URL, hosting, etc. It could be weeks before we see the new
> site up and work
I don't think we should mention the flex.apache.org URL yet. Even if we do
graduate this evening, the infrastructure team will take some time to setup
the new URL, hosting, etc. It could be weeks before we see the new site up
and working. The old URL will forward to the new one when it is active
Marcus,
I've been able to view it at various times during the day. You might have
just hit a server burp. Can you try again?
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Marcus Fritze wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think there is a little error on the following page:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/flex/s
I followed the directions posted on the wiki. I edited the
build.properties and made sure the correct player swc was available. Is
there something else we should be doing?
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/18/12 5:58 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
> > Hi
You are correct -- I don't have a command-line SVN client in my path.
Do you expect any ill effects if it fails?
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
>
> On 12/18/12 7 :46AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> >
> >On Tue, Dec 18, 2
Om,
You can mark that the check-in tests pass for mine too. Technically it
compiles, but I'm waiting on an answer about the batik errors I was getting.
You can also put me down for testing 11.3 and 11.5. I'll throw them on my
CI server while I'm at work so we can get the full Mustella tests on
Yeah, there were a lot of issues with the images earlier. I think they got
cleaned up a week or two ago. Everything should run clean now ;)
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I did not. Theory is you shouldn't have to unless you broke something :)
>
> Ye
I did not. Theory is you shouldn't have to unless you broke something :)
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> @Nick,
>
> Just to know, did you have to regenerate some images or not ?
>
> - Fred
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicho
Just as a note to add to the WIKI... 10.2 and 10.3 passed Mustella for
en_US.
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> echo
> == Apache Batik 1.7 build file
> echo
>
> echo
> JAVA_HOME: ${env.JAVA_HOM
don't know if it was supposed to
fail, but I don't remember seeing that in 4.8
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm confused. When are you getting that error? What precedes that in the
> console?
>
>
> On 12/17/12 9:12 PM, "Nicholas K
Been running it off
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/sdk/branches/release4.9,
and did a super-clean.
I'm getting the same errors when building with the 1.6 JDK for 10.2, 10.3
and 11.1. SWCs seem to be generating fine, but I haven't run them against
mustella just yet. I'll be runni
Good call :) Should be 4.9 RC4 :)
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Paul Hastings wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 8:55 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apache Flex 4.6 RC4 has been deployed here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~**jmclean/Apache%20Flex%204.9.0%**
>> 20Release%20Candidate%204/<
cannot find the file specified
I'm going to run them for 10.3 right now.
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Om wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski >wrote:
>
> > I can't avoid it any longer ;P
>
>
> Karma always gets you in the end
I'm pulling down the changes to my ci server at the moment... I'll also
need somebody to give me wiki karma so I can update the wiki too... I
guess I can't avoid it any longer ;P
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Ok. Compiling is easy and quick.
> About 20
Can somebody give me (quetwo) write karma on Confluence? I guess I never
asked for permissions before :)
-Nick
Sorry. I wanted to make sure the changes got caught in both places. I
forgot to to merge them over :)
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> In future making the changes for a release in the release branch? :-)
>
> On 18/12/2012, at 12:33 AM, que...@apache.org wrote:
>
Ok. Compiling is easy and quick. The full mustella tests take a LONG time.
I can help run some of those overnight (for Windows).
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Are we just doing compiling, or are we running it through Mustella too?
>
> Whatever you can
Are we just doing compiling, or are we running it through Mustella too?
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Om wrote:
> Perfect! Thanks for this. I have updated the page with assignments. I
> will start a new thread calling for folks to help with the testing.
>
> Om
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 20
In the change I pushed out this morning I updated it to say that 11.1 was
the 'certified' version, but it was compatible with other versions.
This version of Apache Flex was certified for use with Flash
Player 11.1, and is
compatible with versions 11.1 through 11.5.
Let me know i
I think you are correct in this thinking. Lets not change any defaults
unless we need to. Allowing the future versions is more important.
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I guess the folks would apreciate to be able to compile their last
> Flex/Air apps
I swear I saw a version of this that came out for 4.0/4.5 and showed off
the spark components
Let me look at my notes to see if I can find it again...
-Nick
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know we could make a new one ourselves, but how hard would it be to
I was pretty sure we were trying to avoid them when possible...
-Nick
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As it is not in my habit to commiting files dependent on specific tools
> like Eclipse but because I saw some of them in the develop branch and there
> are prov
Sorry -- misfire on the auto correct--- That was to say Carol, not
Carroll.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> I know Carroll has battled the issue with the README for a while.
>
> Mind if I take a stab at fixing some awkward wording in the readme? Some
I know Carroll has battled the issue with the README for a while.
Mind if I take a stab at fixing some awkward wording in the readme? Some
of the references to the previous versions are confusing how they are
written today.
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
gainst the current
> framework ?
>
> (Sorry for asking to dig into details but I'm discovering Mustella and I
> might miss how things might impact others)
>
>
> - Fred
>
> -Message d'origine- From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
> Sent: Sunday, December 09,
t regenerating them against the 4.6 is the same
> than the 4.8 as they both use the same swfVersion, right ?
> At the end, you just regenerate them against your own system, right ?
>
> - Fred
>
> -----Message d'origine- From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski
> Sent: Sunday, De
One quick test I do is to generate the base-line images running mustella
against 4.6, and then run mustella against the current tests that were
failing.
That should at least work for the image comparison issues you are seeing..
That is at least what I was doing for the charting components before
Williams,
It seems this is an issue with Adobe AIR, not Flex. I don't think we have
the ability to fix this, as the code is not ours to fix. You may need to
open a ticket with Adobe, or ask the question in the Adobe AIR forums to
see if they can help you out more.
-Nick
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at
I'm the one who committed the changes to the code.
They were minor, and don't effect the display, nor really the operation of
the component. They simply prevent the lifecycle from being run multiple
times. I think all of four lines were changed in the commit.
I've personally been using them in
Carlos,
Just a heads up that this week is a major holiday in the USA, so responses
may be slow through next Monday. Many on infra are out of the US.
On Nov 22, 2012 8:27 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
> Yes :), I'm right now waiting for some response from the infra team, if
> there's no response I w
Carlos,
Those 46 repos are read only... They do not sync back to the main project.
I think even our project is listed there...
On Nov 22, 2012 5:33 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> 2012/11/22 Bertrand Delacretaz
> >
> > FWIW, my reservations were based on
> >
> > a) Git support fr
Would it be possible to setup your whiteboard space and work in there?
That would still allow us to collaborate on the project without worrying
about the rest of the side-effects.
-Nick
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> This is almost what I want, ie make a
Which combinations are you missing?
-Nick
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:09 AM, FRANKLIN GARZON wrote:
>
> Also will be great in paralell way, if the customization of entry keyboard
> for mobile support more combinations, this will helpfuly for confort of
> client in some scenarios.
>
> Franklin Gar
>From what I remember, they didn't make the RichText component selectable in
order to save cycles on the mobile platform... I'm not a fan of the
helper-class, but I'd be up for making another component that extends
RichText that exposes the selectability functionality. There are a lot of
componen
Harbs,
Apache-IDs are for committers. One is generated for them when they are
added to the committie.
-Nick
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Harbs wrote:
> How does one go about creating an Apache ID?
>
> Harbs
>
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On
Thanks for the clarification. I knew I saw some stuff about LLVM in one of
the presentations I attended -- I just wasn't sure to what degree.
-Nick
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Kevin Newman wrote:
> There are two different Flash related LLVM products at Adobe, afaik.
>
> They have an LLVM
+1 Binding
-Nick
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Omar Gonzalez
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sunday, November 18, 2012, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Apache Flex is preparing to graduate to a top-level project at Apache.
> In
> > order to do so, the Apache Flex community must first vote
Kevin,
I'm pretty sure that is what the existing compiler pretty much is. I know
they have mentioned LLMV being involved, but I'm not sure to what point
(I'm not experienced with this compiler myself...)
-Nick
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Kevin Newman wrote:
> I don't know much about comp
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Stefan Horochovec <
stefan.horocho...@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
> The development of the new VM and AS4 specification is not reported or
> discussed with Apache Flex, knowing that we depend exclusively of Flash
> Player and AIR to execute applications. This in my
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Hordur Thordarson wrote:
>
> There are only two visible deployment options going forward, Adobe's VM or
> HTML. Both have plusses and minuses and my view is that HTML has many more
> minuses, at least currently, and I just don't see that changing in the near
> f
We have the compiler -- why can't we just adapt the output to another
platform instead of the input. We are only limited to the input standards
we create outselves. Nothing in the compiler is forcing us to output to
SWF.
-Nick
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@code
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> I only know a little about Haxe. Could you comment on what would be
> required (in terms of skills and effort) to port Flex to Haxe? I know it's
> ActionScript like but is missing a few features that Flex may be using?
> Other than compilin
No. It was not.
If you've ever had the pleasure of using Flex 1.0 or 1.5, well... yeah.
They offered the same UI, but that's it. Otherwise it was a complete mess.
-Nick
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:24 PM, sébastien Paturel
wrote:
> So it means that Flex in AS2 was not flex?
>
>
> Le 15/11/2012
d be done, it should be revisited again to go AS4+AVMNext...
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Nicholas Kwiatkowski
>
> > Sebastian,
> >
> > From what Adobe has told publicly, the new AVM (AVM3 / AS4) will be very
> > different from AVM2/AS3. No display lists, uses
That is the current definition of what it is. The Apache Flex SDK is a
framework written in AS3. Where the code ends up I don't think is
something that really concerns me (as long as the targets I need I can
still get to). Really, this is no different than taking this compiled SWF
data and distr
Sebastian,
>From what Adobe has told publicly, the new AVM (AVM3 / AS4) will be very
different from AVM2/AS3. No display lists, uses "Stage3D" for everything,
etc. They haven't said anything more other than Starling won't be
compatible with it -- there may be a new version created, but since AS4
Most of the work I have been putting into Apache, I've been paid for.
That's why both I and my employer signed the CCLA. This was not
work-for-hire, rather it was the expectation that the work was donated to
Apache. This is no different than what Jeffery is doing.
As far as setting up a standar
+1 (Binding)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Cyrill Zadra wrote:
> +1
>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
> Am 14.11.2012 um 07:26 schrieb Carol Frampton :
>
> > As you've read [1], we're starting to prepare for graduation. One of
> the steps is for this community to choose a Apache PMC Chair for
Bottle of champagne? I just did a random sampling of mirrors, and it looks
like most of them got it overnight. I see a few that haven't, but that
will be corrected over time. We may want to put a bolded statement in
there that says if they have ever installed a previous version of the
installer,
The mirrors take about 24 hours from our experience with the SDK. 90% of
them had synced up within 4 hours, but the rest took to the end of 24 hours
from our experience.
-Nick
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Om wrote:
> I have promoted the release candidates to: /www/
> www.apache.org/dist/in
those from the community to get their feet wet.
-Nick
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Om wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/11/12 11:11 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> >
> > > Om,
&g
Om,
I've been looking through JIRA, and it seems at least a great majority of
the tickets with patches are either assigned to somebody (and waiting), or
have been closed.
Do you have any on your list that you think need to be taken care of? I'm
setup now and would be happy to review them and com
off issue you are facing?
>
> Alex,
>
> How is your Mustella test selector app looking? Reducing the number of
> tests to run for each patch sounds like a good idea to increase the speed
> of community patch acceptance.
>
> Any other ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
Thibault,
Do you know of Adobe's plans to support those of us who are using Captive
Runtimes, but when major bugs are introduced, for example the GPS bug that
was introduced with iOS 5? I realize that Captive Runtime helps us control
our dependencies, but for bugs that are still to be discovered,
That's not exactly true. They said their focus was gaming and premium
video. The side effects of them focusing on those aspects /may/ help us.
Generally speaking, the new VM will not help us in the short-term.
-Nick
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:50 PM, sébastien Paturel
wrote:
> Yes thanks, but w
+1 (Binding)
Looking good!
-Nick
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> All worked on OS X Mountain Lion.
>
> Good work guys, thanks for sticking it out!
>
> -Omar
>
Only thing I can think of off the top of my head is that Stage3D support
for mobile is still spotty at best. This would also require us to target a
newer swfversion, which may have other repercussions I'm not thinking of.
-Nick
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Om wrote:
> I believe that Charts
+1 (Binding)
Good work again guys. Excited to tell the world about it ;)
-Nick
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Hans | dotdotcommadot <
h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote:
> This is true.
> When you build with a different certificate,
> you always need to delete the previous installed version of
Carol,
I was getting the same issue, and I think it had to do with a beta AIR
runtime I had installed. Installed the latest released version and
everything cleaned up.
-Nick
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> Installed and all went fine. md5 matched for both platforms.
We've been shot down before in asking to add a plugin or, really any code
that couldn't run outside the cgi-bin scope. Heck, even updating the
download script so it was work took me almost two weeks (and that was
written by the Apache Infra team).
-Nick
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:13 AM, christofe
I like that a lot better. I just want to deviate too much from the
terminology used in other Apache projects.
-Nick
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/22/12 7:53 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The README file curently has:
> >
> > Getting the latest
I would call it the development branch and cutting-edge branch. When I
hear cutting-edge, I assume work that is near-ready to release, not in
currently development. Just throwing my 2c out there...
-Nick
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The README file curently
stien Paturel
wrote:
> A display list can't be emulated? is it such a bad idea that we should not
> continue to use it anymore?
>
> It's not only the "adobe's direction issue", its the multi target
> direction issue, and getting rid of Adobe's ru
Essentially, anything that references the Stage (do a search/replace for
Stage), and any component that has addChild in it needs to be re-designed.
This could be as simple as re-creating our own DisplayList object, and
pushing that functionality to certain sub-components. I'm not one who
would ev
I've taken a look at it, and gave it the half-day heave.
It looks to be a pretty big task. The biggest problem is the lack of a
DisplayList, which is the model that Flex is based on. That in itself will
cause well over 900 classes to have to be re-engineered. After you've
re=engineered those, a
+1 (binding)
Good job, yet again.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
I've been pulling them down and testing them. They have been working great
-- but I'm not the right person to check for license and EULA issues. You
still have my +1.
-Nick
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Jun Heider wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Michael A. Labriola wrote:
>
> >> I ag
Om,
>From trunk, it looks great in my eyes (although my eyes glaze over on the
details of the licensing stuff). I'm excited for it :)
-Nick
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Om wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 10/9/12 5 :19PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
Is your thought to have the design view really be within a web browser? I
feel like more time would be spent re-creating the functions of a normal
IDE, versus working on the intricacies of the DV itself.
As far as your other questions :
- I don't think there are any finances available to create
We do have a PSD, but there hasn't been much progress past that. I,
personally have also been slammed at work and my other commitments.
Hopefully things should ease up in a few weeks, but until then...
-Nick
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Francis Altomare wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I was just
>From what I understand, that app does verify the MD5 of the downloaded
files from mirrors -- so in effect, it is verifying that the downloads are
authentic enough that they are "singed" by us.
I don't believe the Adobe downloads are signed, nor are MD5 checked. I
don't know if that is of concern
+1 (Binding)
I haven't gotten to the convenience binaries, but the source seems to be
working fine on Windows 7-x64. I'll test the binaries sometime tomorrow.
Great job on this Om and Erik. It's some incredibly convenient software
you've provided us :)
-Nick
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:16 PM, O
I wouldn't recommend that-- When we have a new version, then "we" will have
to maintain a separate list of executable files that need to be modified.
Om, on another note, I downloaded RC3 and it worked great, both from source
and from the binaries on Win7 in my environment. Good job :)
-Nick
O
The content I contribute to the Spoon newsletter is also replicated to the
Apache Flex Incubator homepage, under the "News" section. I haven't
updated this month's content as of yet.
Other sections of the newsletter are contributed by others who may or may
not be Apache Contributes, so those sect
>
> right?
>
>
>
> 2012/9/12 Nicholas Kwiatkowski :
> > Shigeru,
> >
> > It is true that Adobe does not have a 'full' team working on Apache Flex.
> > They currently have three very talented developers working on the
> project,
> &
Shigeru,
It is true that Adobe does not have a 'full' team working on Apache Flex.
They currently have three very talented developers working on the project,
in addition to many other community members. The entire team list is at
http://incubator.apache.org/flex/team.html
There is no 'main' dev
Things are slowing down for me at the office a bit. I've started this on
my own machine (not on github), but haven't picked it up in a few weeks.
I don't think we've heard from Ashish in a bit. Anybody with some "HTML5"
chops want to give me a hand?
-Nick
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Tomas
+1 (Binding)
Working OK for me. I feel we need to verify the FLEX_HOME issue, because I
don't think it picked up the var correctly on my side either. It did work
using the template, however.
-Nick
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, figured out #6 was my problem (was pic
That's a really good question. At the moment, we really don't have /any/
linux based tooling. The compilers may be compiled for Linux in the
future, but that hasn't been our focus at the moment. Let alone, we really
don't have any modern versions of FP debugger.
Making a Linux version of the co
Thanks for pointing them out! These corrections should be live now.
-Nick
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Bruce Montague wrote:
> Hi, I'm posting a very minor errata note here about the "Apache Flex
> (incubating)" page (apologies if this is the wrong list). Although minor,
> it's very visibl
1 - 100 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
