In the change I pushed out this morning I updated it to say that 11.1 was
the 'certified' version, but it was compatible with other versions.
This version of Apache Flex was certified for use with Flash
Player 11.1, and is
compatible with versions 11.1 through 11.5.
Let me know if I should update it.
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/12 2 :25PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Carol Frampton <cfram...@adobe.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/17/12 3 :00AM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I was thinking of adding a dropdown box for the various Flash Players
> >>swcs
> >> >(11.1 through 11.5) and AIR SDK versions (3.1 through 3.5) - so that
> >>it is
> >> >easy for users to chose the runtimes they want to target.
> >>
> >> I would not do this unless you are prepared to do a mustella run with
> >>each
> >> of those combinations to make sure there aren't any issues before we
> >> release.
> >>
> >> Carol
> >>
> >>
> >We need to do a mustella run for each version we support regardless of how
> >we build the Installer. It says in the Release Notes [1] that " Apache
> >Flex SDK can be compiled for any version of the Flash Player from 10.2 to
> >11.5". Has this statement been verified?
>
> I doubt it and given the resources we have I don't think it is likely we
> will test all combinations, especially on both platforms.
>
> I suggest we pick a few "reference" combinations which we test and
> document in the README. The others ones are likely to work. This is a
> open source project so I think that is ok. I don't think it is okay for
> the installer to offer all combinations because that does imply they have
> all been tested.
>
> Carol
>
>
