On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Hordur Thordarson <hor...@lausn.is> wrote:
> > There are only two visible deployment options going forward, Adobe's VM or > HTML. Both have plusses and minuses and my view is that HTML has many more > minuses, at least currently, and I just don't see that changing in the near > future. When the browser vendors can't even agree on basic things like > video playback, sound playback, socket support and more, I don't see HTML > becoming a replacement for Flash player/AIR. It is more likely that Flash > player/Air tech dies and we'll be left with only HTML. At which point I'll > find myself another career ;-) > > How do you figure that? I see that as two options, only if you consider the browser as an output. When you consider that a majority of Flex applications are now targeting AIR as a way to get to native execution on mobile, tablet, television and the desktop there is a lot more you can target...
