We have the compiler -- why can't we just adapt the output to another platform instead of the input. We are only limited to the input standards we create outselves. Nothing in the compiler is forcing us to output to SWF.
-Nick On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Carlos Rovira < carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > > But bad news - in this situation i think guys from Adobe doesn't help us > with new compiler. > > This should not be the motivation to go one way or another. Adobe's > position is already shared and know: They want only gamming. They throw > flex away. Tools, AVMs and languages are updated and designed only with > gamming in mind... > > Alex, Carol and others are here payed by Adobe, but this project is made of > individuals (although some of them are payed by a company). It's clear that > Adobe could close the participation of their people, but this is a risk we > could take if the main direction choosen is what Apache Flex need. > > We must think in what is the best for Apache Flex, and my position is that > a rewrite make us free of technology or tool to choose. And we should not > depend exclusively on Flash Platform and Adobe decisions. It's only a > matter of choose a open source platform that's working and could give us > support in the long term. > > Some months ago my thoughts was very different, but right now that a full > rewrite is required, my opinion is clear about what to choose, and for > something new, I choose Haxe. > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > Director de Tecnología > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > F: +34 912 35 57 77 > http://www.codeoscopic.com > http://www.directwriter.es > http://www.avant2.es >
