Hello,
Automake version 1.17 will land in rawhide in a short while.
Please be aware that a 18 packages that depend on automake fail to build
due to the version upgrade (they have a dependency on version 1.16). The
list of packages is available in the mass-prebuilder report below:
# Mass-prebuild
I know that in Fedora package names are usually prefixed with the name
of the language they are shipped in their binary form. We have "perl",
"python", "ruby", "rust" and probably some more.
I heard that Java packages for historical reasons do not abide this
convention. Do you think we should
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 01:39:46PM +0100, Marián Konček wrote:
> I know that in Fedora package names are usually prefixed with the
> name of the language they are shipped in their binary form. We have
> "perl", "python", "ruby", "rust" and probably some more.
>
> I heard that Java packages for his
This is the Node.js package "Less.js" which converts "less" (LEaner
Style Sheets) into CSS.
I haven't used it for many years, I haven't been able to get 4.2.0 to
build and I just don't have the time or inclination to work on it.
I've thus orphaned it.
If it's useful to you, please go ahead and pi
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241202.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241203.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 116
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 20.40 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
are you able to login to FAS account to any other service?
Michal
On 12/3/24 09:34, Barry Scott wrote:
I'm trying to access fedora bugzilla to update a bug.
I was emailed this link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251248
When I open that page and click Login and choose FAS
I'm trying to access fedora bugzilla to update a bug.
I was emailed this link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251248
When I open that page and click Login and choose FAS
I am taken to this page:
https://id.fedoraproject.org/saml2/SSO/Redirect?SAMLRequest=hVJdTxsxEHznV1h%2Bz33ScFhJ
I am talking about all packages that install .jar files.
On 3. 12. 2024 14:17, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 01:39:46PM +0100, Marián Konček wrote:
I know that in Fedora package names are usually prefixed with the
name of the language they are shipped in their binary form. W
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 1:41 PM Marián Konček wrote:
>
> I know that in Fedora package names are usually prefixed with the name
> of the language they are shipped in their binary form. We have "perl",
> "python", "ruby", "rust" and probably some more.
>
> I heard that Java packages for historical r
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 4:35 AM František Lachman wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Regarding the Packit role in situations like this, I hope it does not matter
> much if it's used. Packit user is not even listed as a maintainer of packages
> since it does not require any extra permissions. And most importan
Dne 03. 12. 24 v 2:52 odp. Neal Gompa napsal(a):
I'm not sure how we can improve this. At least this package doesn't
seem to be using the feature to auto-merge and auto-build like some of
the others do. Those are the features that create this problem.
There is no "auto-merge" feature.
We have
I'm trying to build the KiCad package on rawhide via koji. I'm getting the
following errors:
DEBUG util.py:459: Repositories loaded.
DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:
DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build
requires libvtkCommonCore.
Once upon a time, Marián Konček said:
> I know that in Fedora package names are usually prefixed with the
> name of the language they are shipped in their binary form. We have
> "perl", "python", "ruby", "rust" and probably some more.
That's not true in general. It's done typically for library-t
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 9:08 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 03. 12. 24 v 2:52 odp. Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > I'm not sure how we can improve this. At least this package doesn't
> > seem to be using the feature to auto-merge and auto-build like some of
> > the others do. Those are the features tha
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 3:19 PM Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> I'm trying to build the KiCad package on rawhide via koji. I'm getting the
> following errors:
>
> DEBUG util.py:459: Repositories loaded.
> DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:
> DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: package vt
Hello,
Regarding the Packit role in situations like this, I hope it does not matter
much if it's used. Packit user is not even listed as a maintainer of packages
since it does not require any extra permissions. And most importantly, Packit
does not work without human interaction (in the form of
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:10:03PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Just a heads up for OCaml.
>
> We currently have OCaml 5.2.0 in Fedora 41 & Rawhide.
>
> OCaml 5.3.0 is expected to be released at the "end of November or
> beginning of December"[1], so it would make sense to move straight to
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 08:34:08AM +, Barry Scott wrote:
...
> And it shows the "400 - Bad Request" messages.
>
> Following the link to Fedorta infrastructure
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues
>
> also ends with the "400 - Bad page".
I get this frequently too. It usually w
I'm using kerberos token most of the time, so I don't see this.
I saw reports about this happening, but it's hard to reproduce. After
first successful login it's usually doesn't happen on the following ones :-/
Michal
On 12/3/24 11:50, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 08:34:
On 03/12/2024 09.34, Barry Scott wrote:
I'm trying to access fedora bugzilla to update a bug.
I was emailed this link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251248
When I open that page and click Login and choose FAS
I am taken to this page:
https://id.fedoraproject.org/saml2/SSO/Redi
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 09:19:40AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> I'm trying to build the KiCad package on rawhide via koji. I'm getting the
> following errors:
>
> DEBUG util.py:459: Repositories loaded.
> DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction:
> DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: p
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 12:08:58PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
> on Matrix.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraprojec
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ChangeToGitCore
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-switch-to-git-core-self-contained/138975
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
proce
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeprecatePamSshAgent
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-deprecate-pam-ssh-agent-component-self-contained/138977
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraWSL
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-fedora-wsl-self-contained/138979
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals
Dne 03. 12. 24 v 18:01 Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
=== BuildRequire on git ===
$ grep -E '^BuildRequires:\s*git$' *.spec |cut -d ":" -f1 |sed
's:.spec::'
rubygem-coveralls
rubygem-pdfkit
rubygem--core.spec
rubygem--expectations.spec
rubygem--mocks.spec
rubygem--support.spec
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Dnf5ExpiredPGPKeys
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-dnf5-expired-keys-system-wide/138978
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
proces
Dne 03. 12. 24 v 18:01 Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
=== BuildRequire on git ===
$ grep -E '^BuildRequires:\s*git$' *.spec |cut -d ":" -f1 |sed 's:.spec::'
rubygem-coveralls
rubygem-pdfkit
rubygem--core.spec
rubygem--expectations.spec
rubygem--mocks.spec
rubygem--support.spec
r
Wiki -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Firewalld_IPv6_rpfilter_Default_Loose
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-firewalld-ipv6-rpfilter-default-to-loose-on-workstations-self-contained/138980
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This docume
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 04. 11. 24 17:26, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > I am going to add compat Tcl/Tk 8.6 packages, because IMHO porting of
> > the packages to Tcl/Tk 9 will take significant time and maybe some of
> > the packages will never be ported. But IMHO i
Hau idatzi du Peter Boy Uni (p...@uni-bremen.de) erabiltzaileak (2024
abe. 3(a), ar. (20:38)):
>
>
>
> > Am 03.12.2024 um 19:32 schrieb Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> > :
> >
> > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SplitOpendmarcTools
> > Discussion Thread -
> > https://discussion.fe
On 03. 12. 24 19:43, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
If we receive enough candidates to hold an election for FESCo, voting will
start on Friday 6th December, as per the elections schedule[3].
What about the interviews?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok
Hi Kamil,
Firstly, apologies for dropping the ball responding to the PR.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 08:30:52AM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 27, 2024 12:07:29 AM GMT+1 Michel Lind wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:11:27PM -0300, Marco Benatto wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
>
Hi,
On Mon, 2024-12-02 at 14:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> with this patch, it compiles:
>
> --- CPU-X-5.1.1/data/CMakeLists.txt.orig 2024-12-02
> 14:00:01.633120597 +0100
> +++ CPU-X-5.1.1/data/CMakeLists.txt 2024-12-02
> 14:01:24.046247681 +0100
> @@ -36,11 +36,11 @@
>
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-12-03/fesco.2024-12-03-17.00.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-12-03/fesco.2024-12-03-17.00.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_m
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SplitOpendmarcTools
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-split-opendmarc-with-tools-subpackage-self-contained/138989
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As pa
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.4
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-ruby-3-4-system-wide/138984
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are pu
> Am 03.12.2024 um 19:32 schrieb Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> :
>
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SplitOpendmarcTools
> Discussion Thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-split-opendmarc-with-tools-subpackage-self-contained/138989
>
> This is
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 11:11:42AM +, Christopher Klooz wrote:
> Kevin and I have already worked on this in a pagure ticket (I experienced it
> as well frequently in the past):
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11962
>
> I already posted this mailing list thread in the ticket t
Hi all,
This PR updates rubberband from v3 to v4; in the process the soversion
is bumped from 2 to 3:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubberband/pull-request/11#request_diff
Per the upstream announcement the API should be backward compatible
https://www.breakfastquay.com/news/20241025.html
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241203.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241204.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:87
Upgraded packages: 44
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 44.38 KiB
Size of dropped packages:344.54 MiB
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveFipsModeSetup
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-remove-fips-mode-setup-system-wide/138983
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IntelSGX
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-intel-sgx-software-stack-self-contained/138981
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
proces
Saw the answer in todays Fesco meeting on Matrix now
Den sön 1 dec. 2024 kl 17:54 skrev Luna Jernberg :
> Hey!
>
> How is it going with this?
> not seen any voting open up yet
>
> Den mån 18 nov. 2024 kl 23:13 skrev Aoife Moloney via devel-announce <
> devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org>:
>
>
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDL2onSDL3
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-replace-sdl-2-with-sdl2-compat-using-sdl-3-self-contained/138987
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part o
On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 16:47 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 09:19:40AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > I'm trying to build the KiCad package on rawhide via koji. I'm
> > getting the following errors:
> >
> > DEBUG util.py:459: Repositories loaded.
> > DEBUG util.py:4
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/12/04 2:20:
Dne 03. 12. 24 v 18:01 Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
=== BuildRequire on git ===
$ grep -E '^BuildRequires:\s*git$' *.spec |cut -d ":" -f1 |sed 's:.spec::'
rubygem-coveralls
rubygem-pdfkit
rubygem--core.spec
rubygem--expectations.spec
ruby
Hello folks,
In order to hold an election for FESCo this cycle, we need more candidates!
FESCo has decided to extend the nominations period until Thursday 5th
December[1], which means if you or someone you know would like to run for
election for FESCo, you now have until 23:23:59 UTC on Thursday 5
48 matches
Mail list logo
