On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 09:19:40AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: > I'm trying to build the KiCad package on rawhide via koji. I'm getting the > following errors: > > DEBUG util.py:459: Repositories loaded. > DEBUG util.py:459: Failed to resolve the transaction: > DEBUG util.py:459: Problem: package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from > build requires libvtkCommonCore.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can > be installed > DEBUG util.py:459: - package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build > requires libvtksys.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > DEBUG util.py:459: - package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build > requires libvtkRenderingCore.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > DEBUG util.py:459: - package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build > requires libvtkRenderingOpenGL2.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can > be installed > DEBUG util.py:459: - package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build > requires libvtkWrappingTools.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > DEBUG util.py:459: - package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build > requires vtk(x86-64) = 9.2.6-21.fc42, but none of the providers can be > installed > DEBUG util.py:459: - package opencascade-devel-7.8.1-3.fc41.x86_64 from > build requires vtk-devel, but none of the providers can be installed > DEBUG util.py:459: - package vtk-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build requires > libgdal.so.36()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > DEBUG util.py:459: - conflicting requests > DEBUG util.py:459: - nothing provides libarrow.so.1601()(64bit) needed by > gdal-libs-3.10.0-1.fc42.x86_64 from build > DEBUG util.py:459: - nothing provides libarrow_dataset.so.1601()(64bit) > needed by gdal-libs-3.10.0-1.fc42.x86_64 from build > DEBUG util.py:459: - nothing provides libparquet.so.1601()(64bit) needed > by gdal-libs-3.10.0-1.fc42.x86_64 from build > > I guess I just need to wait for the above packages to sort themselves out, > but I wanted to ask here if there is something more that is needed. Perhaps > something got pushed prematurely?
As noted in the other reply, this is fall-out from the libarrow update. Note that gdal is really broken (FTBFS prior to the libarrow change). As your problem is caused by a common package using gdal, it's too bad until gdal is fixed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2329164 (unless maybe the dependency on gdal could be removed) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
