On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 3:19 PM Steven A. Falco <stevenfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to build the KiCad package on rawhide via koji.  I'm getting the 
> following errors:
>
> DEBUG util.py:459:  Repositories loaded.
> DEBUG util.py:459:  Failed to resolve the transaction:
> DEBUG util.py:459:  Problem: package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from 
> build requires libvtkCommonCore.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can 
> be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build 
> requires libvtksys.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build 
> requires libvtkRenderingCore.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
> installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build 
> requires libvtkRenderingOpenGL2.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can 
> be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build 
> requires libvtkWrappingTools.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
> installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package vtk-devel-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build 
> requires vtk(x86-64) = 9.2.6-21.fc42, but none of the providers can be 
> installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package opencascade-devel-7.8.1-3.fc41.x86_64 from 
> build requires vtk-devel, but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - package vtk-9.2.6-21.fc42.x86_64 from build requires 
> libgdal.so.36()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - conflicting requests
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - nothing provides libarrow.so.1601()(64bit) needed by 
> gdal-libs-3.10.0-1.fc42.x86_64 from build
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - nothing provides libarrow_dataset.so.1601()(64bit) 
> needed by gdal-libs-3.10.0-1.fc42.x86_64 from build
> DEBUG util.py:459:    - nothing provides libparquet.so.1601()(64bit) needed 
> by gdal-libs-3.10.0-1.fc42.x86_64 from build
>
> I guess I just need to wait for the above packages to sort themselves out, 
> but I wanted to ask here if there is something more that is needed.  Perhaps 
> something got pushed prematurely?

Looks like this is due to the libarrow 18 update that got pushed
recently - I think not all affected packages could be successfully
rebuilt. So this is likely fallout from that, there's likely nothing
you can do other than wait for this to be resolved.

Fabio
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to