On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 4:35 AM František Lachman <flach...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > Regarding the Packit role in situations like this, I hope it does not matter > much if it's used. Packit user is not even listed as a maintainer of packages > since it does not require any extra permissions. And most importantly, Packit > does not work without human interaction (in the form of PR review and > merging) which is a positive thing I think. No change will get to dist-git > automatically and just a set of Packit-created new-release pull-requests gets > updated when there is a new version. Is this activity misleading to the > orphaning scripts? Should the scripts be updated or something changed on the > Packit side so as not to cause false expectations that the package is being > actively maintained? >
I'm not sure how we can improve this. At least this package doesn't seem to be using the feature to auto-merge and auto-build like some of the others do. Those are the features that create this problem. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
