Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-04 Thread Gang Wu
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 10:29 AM Renjie Liu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 4:00 AM Tathagata Das > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 9:12 AM karuppayya wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:15 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: >>> +1 >

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-04 Thread Renjie Liu
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 4:00 AM Tathagata Das wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 9:12 AM karuppayya wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:15 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:58 PM Chao Sun wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > On Tue, Sep

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-04 Thread Tathagata Das
+1 On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 9:12 AM karuppayya wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:15 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:58 PM Chao Sun wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:23 PM Allison Wang < >> allison.w...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: >> >> >

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-03 Thread Allison Wang
+1 On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 7:57 PM Wenchen Fan wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Yufei Gu wrote: > >> +1 >> Yufei >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:35 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>> +1 On Tu

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-03 Thread Denny Lee
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 17:13 Gengliang Wang wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote: >> >>> Hi Micah, >>> >>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark >>>

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-03 Thread Yufei Gu
+1 Yufei On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:35 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote: >> >>> Hi Micah, >>> >>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark >>> comm

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-03 Thread Gengliang Wang
+1 On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote: > >> Hi Micah, >> >> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark >> community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There are >> several po

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-03 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
+1 On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote: > Hi Micah, > > I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark > community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There are > several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting this > high-level

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-03 Thread Micah Kornfield
OK, my main concern is that some of the finalized details might impact people's feelings on the matter (release cadence, type unification, etc...). If we are willing to take a sort it out later approach, I'm +1 (non-binding). Thanks, Micah On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 12:02 PM Gene Pang wrote: > Hi

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-03 Thread Gene Pang
Hi Micah, I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There are several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting this high-level agreement for the new home is helpful. I see this vote for decidi

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-03 Thread Micah Kornfield
I think maybe we should finalize the details before having a vote, to make sure everyone understands the implications? On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:12 AM Gene Pang wrote: > Hi, > > In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to Parquet, and > the Parquet community is in support of rec

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-03 Thread Gene Pang
Hi, In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to Parquet, and the Parquet community is in support of receiving Variant. The details are not fully figured out, but there is high-level alignment in moving it to Parquet. Thanks, Gene On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:17 PM Mridul Muralidhar

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-02 Thread huaxin gao
+1 On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 4:59 PM Xiao Li wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:19 Reynold Xin > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 9:30 AM Gene Pang wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and >>> library to the Parquet project.

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-02 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Hi, What was the conclusions of discussions with Parquet and Iceberg communities on this ? Thanks, Mridul On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:48 PM Gene Pang wrote: > Hi all, > > I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and library > to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-02 Thread Xiao Li
+1 On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:19 Reynold Xin wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 9:30 AM Gene Pang wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and library >> to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant binary format and shredding >> format to be

Re: [VOTE] Move Variant to Parquet

2024-09-02 Thread Reynold Xin
+1 On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 9:30 AM Gene Pang wrote: > Hi all, > > I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and library > to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant binary format and shredding > format to be more widely used by other interested projects and systems. > > P