+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 10:29 AM Renjie Liu wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 4:00 AM Tathagata Das
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 9:12 AM karuppayya wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:15 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>>>
+1
>
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 4:00 AM Tathagata Das
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 9:12 AM karuppayya wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:15 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:58 PM Chao Sun wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Sep
+1
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 9:12 AM karuppayya wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:15 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:58 PM Chao Sun wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:23 PM Allison Wang <
>> allison.w...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >>
>
+1
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 7:57 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Yufei Gu wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Yufei
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:35 PM Gengliang Wang wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
+1
On Tu
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 17:13 Gengliang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Micah,
>>>
>>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark
>>>
+1
Yufei
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:35 PM Gengliang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Micah,
>>>
>>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark
>>> comm
+1
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote:
>
>> Hi Micah,
>>
>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark
>> community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There are
>> several po
+1
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote:
> Hi Micah,
>
> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark
> community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There are
> several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting this
> high-level
OK, my main concern is that some of the finalized details might impact
people's feelings on the matter (release cadence, type unification,
etc...). If we are willing to take a sort it out later approach, I'm +1
(non-binding).
Thanks,
Micah
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 12:02 PM Gene Pang wrote:
> Hi
Hi Micah,
I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark
community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There are
several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting this
high-level agreement for the new home is helpful. I see this vote for
decidi
I think maybe we should finalize the details before having a vote, to make
sure everyone understands the implications?
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:12 AM Gene Pang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to Parquet, and
> the Parquet community is in support of rec
Hi,
In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to Parquet, and
the Parquet community is in support of receiving Variant. The details are
not fully figured out, but there is high-level alignment in moving it to
Parquet.
Thanks,
Gene
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:17 PM Mridul Muralidhar
+1
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 4:59 PM Xiao Li wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:19 Reynold Xin
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 9:30 AM Gene Pang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and
>>> library to the Parquet project.
Hi,
What was the conclusions of discussions with Parquet and Iceberg
communities on this ?
Thanks,
Mridul
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:48 PM Gene Pang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and library
> to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant
+1
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:19 Reynold Xin
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 9:30 AM Gene Pang wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and library
>> to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant binary format and shredding
>> format to be
+1
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 9:30 AM Gene Pang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and library
> to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant binary format and shredding
> format to be more widely used by other interested projects and systems.
>
> P
16 matches
Mail list logo