I think maybe we should finalize the details before having a vote, to make sure everyone understands the implications?
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:12 AM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to Parquet, and > the Parquet community is in support of receiving Variant. The details are > not fully figured out, but there is high-level alignment in moving it to > Parquet. > > Thanks, > Gene > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:17 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> What was the conclusions of discussions with Parquet and Iceberg >> communities on this ? >> >> Thanks, >> Mridul >> >> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:48 PM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and >>> library to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant binary format and >>> shredding format to be more widely used by other interested projects and >>> systems. >>> >>> Please refer to the discussion thread: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0k5oj3mn0049fcxoxm3gx3d7r28gw4rj >>> >>> This vote will be open for the next 72 hours >>> >>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Gene >>> >>
