+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 10:29 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 4:00 AM Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 9:12 AM karuppayya <karuppayya1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:15 PM L. C. Hsieh <vii...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:58 PM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > +1 >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:23 PM Allison Wang < >>>> allison.w...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> +1 >>>> >> >>>> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 7:57 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> +1 >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Yufei >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:35 PM Gengliang Wang <ltn...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Hi Micah, >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where >>>> the Spark community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. >>>> There are several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting >>>> this high-level agreement for the new home is helpful. I see this vote for >>>> deciding on the direction of the move (which project to move to), and not >>>> deciding on the mechanisms or process of the move. >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> The details and implications of the actual move are not >>>> finalized, and are currently work in progress, and will be shared in the >>>> near future. >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>>>> Gene >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 10:28 AM Micah Kornfield < >>>> emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> I think maybe we should finalize the details before having a >>>> vote, to make sure everyone understands the implications? >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:12 AM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to >>>> Parquet, and the Parquet community is in support of receiving Variant. The >>>> details are not fully figured out, but there is high-level alignment in >>>> moving it to Parquet. >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>>>>>> Gene >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:17 PM Mridul Muralidharan < >>>> mri...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> What was the conclusions of discussions with Parquet and >>>> Iceberg communities on this ? >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mridul >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:48 PM Gene Pang < >>>> gene.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant >>>> specification and library to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant >>>> binary format and shredding format to be more widely used by other >>>> interested projects and systems. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please refer to the discussion thread: >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0k5oj3mn0049fcxoxm3gx3d7r28gw4rj >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for the next 72 hours >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Gene >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>>> >>>>
