+1 On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 7:57 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> Yufei >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:35 PM Gengliang Wang <ltn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Micah, >>>>> >>>>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the >>>>> Spark community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There >>>>> are several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting this >>>>> high-level agreement for the new home is helpful. I see this vote for >>>>> deciding on the direction of the move (which project to move to), and not >>>>> deciding on the mechanisms or process of the move. >>>>> >>>>> The details and implications of the actual move are not finalized, and >>>>> are currently work in progress, and will be shared in the near future. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Gene >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 10:28 AM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think maybe we should finalize the details before having a vote, to >>>>>> make sure everyone understands the implications? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:12 AM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to >>>>>>> Parquet, and the Parquet community is in support of receiving Variant. >>>>>>> The >>>>>>> details are not fully figured out, but there is high-level alignment in >>>>>>> moving it to Parquet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Gene >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:17 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What was the conclusions of discussions with Parquet and Iceberg >>>>>>>> communities on this ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Mridul >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:48 PM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and >>>>>>>>> library to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant binary format >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> shredding format to be more widely used by other interested projects >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> systems. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please refer to the discussion thread: >>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0k5oj3mn0049fcxoxm3gx3d7r28gw4rj >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for the next 72 hours >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal >>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gene >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
