+1 On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 9:12 AM karuppayya <karuppayya1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:15 PM L. C. Hsieh <vii...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:58 PM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:23 PM Allison Wang < >> allison.w...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 7:57 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> +1 >> >>>> Yufei >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:35 PM Gengliang Wang <ltn...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> +1 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> +1 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Hi Micah, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the >> Spark community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There >> are several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting this >> high-level agreement for the new home is helpful. I see this vote for >> deciding on the direction of the move (which project to move to), and not >> deciding on the mechanisms or process of the move. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> The details and implications of the actual move are not >> finalized, and are currently work in progress, and will be shared in the >> near future. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>> Gene >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 10:28 AM Micah Kornfield < >> emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> I think maybe we should finalize the details before having a >> vote, to make sure everyone understands the implications? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:12 AM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to >> Parquet, and the Parquet community is in support of receiving Variant. The >> details are not fully figured out, but there is high-level alignment in >> moving it to Parquet. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>> Gene >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:17 PM Mridul Muralidharan < >> mri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> What was the conclusions of discussions with Parquet and >> Iceberg communities on this ? >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>>> Mridul >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:48 PM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification >> and library to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant binary format >> and shredding format to be more widely used by other interested projects >> and systems. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Please refer to the discussion thread: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0k5oj3mn0049fcxoxm3gx3d7r28gw4rj >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for the next 72 hours >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal >> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Gene >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >>
