+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 17:13 Gengliang Wang <ltn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Micah,
>>>
>>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark
>>> community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There are
>>> several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting this
>>> high-level agreement for the new home is helpful. I see this vote for
>>> deciding on the direction of the move (which project to move to), and not
>>> deciding on the mechanisms or process of the move.
>>>
>>> The details and implications of the actual move are not finalized, and
>>> are currently work in progress, and will be shared in the near future.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gene
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 10:28 AM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think maybe we should finalize the details before having a vote, to
>>>> make sure everyone understands the implications?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:12 AM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to Parquet,
>>>>> and the Parquet community is in support of receiving Variant. The details
>>>>> are not fully figured out, but there is high-level alignment in moving it
>>>>> to Parquet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Gene
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:17 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   What was the conclusions of discussions with Parquet and Iceberg
>>>>>> communities on this ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Mridul
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:48 PM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and
>>>>>>> library to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant binary format 
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> shredding format to be more widely used by other interested projects and
>>>>>>> systems.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please refer to the discussion thread:
>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0k5oj3mn0049fcxoxm3gx3d7r28gw4rj
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This vote will be open for the next 72 hours
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal
>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gene
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to