OK, my main concern is that some of the finalized details might impact people's feelings on the matter (release cadence, type unification, etc...). If we are willing to take a sort it out later approach, I'm +1 (non-binding).
Thanks, Micah On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 12:02 PM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Micah, > > I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark > community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There are > several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting this > high-level agreement for the new home is helpful. I see this vote for > deciding on the direction of the move (which project to move to), and not > deciding on the mechanisms or process of the move. > > The details and implications of the actual move are not finalized, and are > currently work in progress, and will be shared in the near future. > > Thanks, > Gene > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 10:28 AM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I think maybe we should finalize the details before having a vote, to >> make sure everyone understands the implications? >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:12 AM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to Parquet, >>> and the Parquet community is in support of receiving Variant. The details >>> are not fully figured out, but there is high-level alignment in moving it >>> to Parquet. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Gene >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:17 PM Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> What was the conclusions of discussions with Parquet and Iceberg >>>> communities on this ? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Mridul >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:48 PM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant specification and >>>>> library to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant binary format and >>>>> shredding format to be more widely used by other interested projects and >>>>> systems. >>>>> >>>>> Please refer to the discussion thread: >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0k5oj3mn0049fcxoxm3gx3d7r28gw4rj >>>>> >>>>> This vote will be open for the next 72 hours >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> Gene >>>>> >>>>
