+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 4:00 AM Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 9:12 AM karuppayya <karuppayya1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:15 PM L. C. Hsieh <vii...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:58 PM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:23 PM Allison Wang < >>> allison.w...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 7:57 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> +1 >>> >>>> Yufei >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:35 PM Gengliang Wang <ltn...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> +1 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> +1 >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Hi Micah, >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where >>> the Spark community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. >>> There are several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting >>> this high-level agreement for the new home is helpful. I see this vote for >>> deciding on the direction of the move (which project to move to), and not >>> deciding on the mechanisms or process of the move. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> The details and implications of the actual move are not >>> finalized, and are currently work in progress, and will be shared in the >>> near future. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>> >>>>>>> Gene >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 10:28 AM Micah Kornfield < >>> emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> I think maybe we should finalize the details before having a >>> vote, to make sure everyone understands the implications? >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:12 AM Gene Pang <gene.p...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to >>> Parquet, and the Parquet community is in support of receiving Variant. The >>> details are not fully figured out, but there is high-level alignment in >>> moving it to Parquet. >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>> >>>>>>>>> Gene >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:17 PM Mridul Muralidharan < >>> mri...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> What was the conclusions of discussions with Parquet and >>> Iceberg communities on this ? >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>> >>>>>>>>>> Mridul >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 12:48 PM Gene Pang < >>> gene.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to start a vote for moving the Variant >>> specification and library to the Parquet project. This allows the Variant >>> binary format and shredding format to be more widely used by other >>> interested projects and systems. >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please refer to the discussion thread: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0k5oj3mn0049fcxoxm3gx3d7r28gw4rj >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for the next 72 hours >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal >>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Gene >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>> >>>
