What's the release goal of AOO 4.0, in my understanding, no regression
issue is hard goal. to support this goal we need more regression test.
Besides that, I think test platform support also need to be considered.
There is discussion before on old support platforms, IMHO, we should
announce suppor
Welcome, Manju!
- Simon
2012/11/19 Xue Fei Duan
> Manju,
> Welcome joining us. I believe you will enjoy in AOO project. Follow link s
> some QA guideline, you can take a look at it, if you have any question ,
> feel free to let us know.
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/orientati
Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on
a ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
Any Administrator ("sysop") can create a new user account. I will
research what change is required to block other sign-up methods.
Currently, Mwiki is under massive attack
On 11/20/2012 06:46, tj wrote:
Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on
a ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
Any Administrator ("sysop") can create a new user account. I will
research what change is required to block other sign-up methods.
Currently, M
Hi,
On 20.11.2012 12:46, tj wrote:
Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on a ML?
Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
Any Administrator ("sysop") can create a new user account. I will research what
change is required to block other sign-up methods.
Current
Hi,
tj schrieb:
Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on
a ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
+1
I had made that suggestion already. Do not wait, but change it immediately.
Kind regards
Regina
On 20.11.2012 12:46, tj wrote:
Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on
a ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
I agree that for the current spam attack this is the most reasonable
solution.
After that period the the registration captcha should become
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Thus, +1 from my side.
The change will hurt new Mwiki users, but it seems to be needed to
protect our Mwiki.
I agree. The time volunteers (thanks!) are spending on deleting spammers
can be better spent in other ways. Let's just make sure that
registrations can be
+1 from my sideand +1 to NOT wait 72 hours, we need to block it.
Jan.
On 20 November 2012 13:00, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 20.11.2012 12:46, tj wrote:
>
>> Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on
>> a ML?
>> Temporarily or permanently, I d
On 11/20/2012 07:35, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Thus, +1 from my side.
The change will hurt new Mwiki users, but it seems to be needed to
protect our Mwiki.
I agree. The time volunteers (thanks!) are spending on deleting spammers
can be better spent in other ways. Let
On 11/20/2012 07:24, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi,
tj schrieb:
Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on
a ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
+1
I had made that suggestion already. Do not wait, but change it immediately.
Kind regards
Regina
Thanks, R
I'm not a Linux User (my last Linux experience were years ago)... But Can I
also join?
- Simon
2012/11/20 Ji Yan
> Attractive event, I'll be there.
>
>
> 2012/11/20 Chao Huang
>
> > What an expected party in Beijing ! Thanks!
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/20 Peter Junge
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > as we
On 11/20/2012 07:31, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 20.11.2012 12:46, tj wrote:
Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on
a ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
I agree that for the current spam attack this is the most reasonable
solution.
After that period th
+1.
Basically, my recent LINUX experience are all coming from building and
debugging AOO in it.
Registered already.
在 2012/11/20 9:28 PM，"Shenfeng Liu" 写道：
> I'm not a Linux User (my last Linux experience were years ago)... But Can I
> also join?
>
> - Simon
>
>
> 2012/11/20 Ji Yan
>
> > Attrac
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:46 AM, tj wrote:
> Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on a
> ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
>
How many "real" wiki accounts do we get on a typical (no-spam) day?
Are we sure that the admins can handle that volume of manua
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> We're in the process of creating an updated OpenOffice professional
>> services directory, to replace the outdated one that we removed from
>> the website a few months ago.
>
>
> I've been looking at doin
On 11/20/2012 09:21, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:46 AM, tj wrote:
Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on a
ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
How many "real" wiki accounts do we get on a typical (no-spam) day?
Are we sure that the ad
On Nov 20, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:46 AM, tj wrote:
>> Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on a
>> ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
>>
>
> How many "real" wiki accounts do we get on a typical (no-spam) day?
>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:46 AM, tj wrote:
>>> Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts on a
>>> ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
>>>
>>
>> How many
On 17.11.2012 18:24, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Apache OpenOffice at FOSDEM 2013, 2-3 February 2013, Brussels
>
> Apache OpenOffice (formerly OpenOffice.org) is coming again to
> FOSDEM in Brussels, for the first time as an Apache Top-Level
> Project. Our community has a new structure, friendly and
Hi.
I have just received a bit strange e-mail from a
Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com
with the content:
May I suggest you subscribe to the dev list?
To subscribe to the list, send a message to:
--
Ian
Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)
www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940
On 20 November 2012 17:06, jan iversen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have just received a bit strange e-mail from a
> Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com
>
> with the content:
> May I suggest you subscribe to the dev list?
> To subscribe to the list, send a message to:
>
>
It's because I am a moderator to th
Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
Please add your talk proposals to the following page:
http://s.apache.org/fosdem-2013-proposals
Probably a SQ ("stupid question"): what is needed to become able to edit that
Wiki?
Tried my Apache userid and password to no avail. Should I create a separate
user
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>
>
> On 11/19/2012 3:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> Re this discussion initiated by Marcus on Nov 9 (I know longer have the
>> original):
>>
>> http://markmail.org/message/fz7mkldympxwrnvn
>>
>> Whole looking around for our current buildbot out
On 20.11.2012 18:21, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
>>> Please add your talk proposals to the following page:
>>> http://s.apache.org/fosdem-2013-proposals
>> Probably a SQ ("stupid question"): what is needed to become able to edit
>> that Wiki?
>> Tried my Apache user
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Maybe the CFP e-mails could explicitly communicate the need to create
an own account with that Wiki? (Maybe there could be interested
speakers who may be shied away because they might have troubles to
quickly add a proposal to the Wiki?)
I think it's a minor inconvenien
Another option is to do a reply to all on the moderation note. This
white lists the address for posting. This is useful for cases where
someone posts from multiple addresses but only wants to receive one
copy of posts.
-Rob
On Nov 20, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On 20 November 2012 17
On 20.11.2012 19:20, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> Maybe the CFP e-mails could explicitly communicate the need to create
>> an own account with that Wiki? (Maybe there could be interested
>> speakers who may be shied away because they might have troubles to
>> quickly add a
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>> This is mainly a community-relations / public outreach idea. I
>>> noticed that when we do a blog post we get a lot of unrelated
>>> questions, some of them quit
Welcome to our community please confirm your membership to the Mailing list at:
https://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/mailing-lists.html#qa-mailing-list
Also try to read about the TCM and how to use it.
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Testlink
On 11/20/12, PRADEEP KOULAGI wrote:
> Hello
On 11/20/2012 12:06, jan iversen wrote:
Hi.
Rob:
What qualification would a Wiki maintainer need ? I used to maintain our
business sites, which were PHP and AJAX based, with MySql behind, it that
would fit, it is a job which I would volunteer for.
Jan,
A Wiki maintainer needs PHP and MySQL kn
Rob,
I had a quick look at the mediawiki homepage, and the things they have does
not exactly scare, especially if people can accept that there is a
learning/introduction period.
I think your idea of a maintenance page is good, it should also contain a
place where users can write ideas (relating t
On 11/20/12, tj wrote:
> On 11/20/2012 12:06, jan iversen wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Rob:
>> What qualification would a Wiki maintainer need ? I used to maintain our
>> business sites, which were PHP and AJAX based, with MySql behind, it that
>> would fit, it is a job which I would volunteer for.
>
> Jan
For future reference:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Combating_spam
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Anti-spam_features
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AbuseFilter
(that last one appears to allow an admin to define patterns to block,
and these patterns could include the specific link
I agree with the views of Alexandro, you cannot do such a job (or any job)
without being committed.
Question to Alexandro: if you did in the past, you have valuable
experience, so the most efficient thing would probably be that you continue
doing it, or is that not an option ?
I volunteered becau
And further to that.
We use release 1.15.5 from 2010-7-28. The current release is 1.20, and
scanning through the different release notes, a lot of work has gone into
security issues in the later version, including closing a number of old
loopholes in PHP.
Jan.
On 20 November 2012 23:09, Rob Wei
On 11/20/12, jan iversen wrote:
> I agree with the views of Alexandro, you cannot do such a job (or any job)
> without being committed.
>
> Question to Alexandro: if you did in the past, you have valuable
> experience, so the most efficient thing would probably be that you continue
> doing it, or
On 20 November 2012 19:01, Rob Weir wrote:
> Another option is to do a reply to all on the moderation note. This
> white lists the address for posting.
Ok, hadn't realised that.
> This is useful for cases where
> someone posts from multiple addresses but only wants to receive one
> copy of p
Am 11/20/2012 01:35 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Thus, +1 from my side.
The change will hurt new Mwiki users, but it seems to be needed to
protect our Mwiki.
+1 also from me. Don't wait here, just act when you already know what to do.
I agree. The time volunteer
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 11/20/2012 01:35 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>
>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Thus, +1 from my side.
>>> The change will hurt new Mwiki users, but it seems to be needed to
>>> protect our Mwiki.
>
>
> +1 also from me. Don't wait
Sorry Ian, I am just a bit sensitive on spam at the moment, I had not seen
your name on the list, so I was confused since I write regularly (during
the last couple of months on dev and l10n lists).
Just to explain, I was subscribed as jancasacon...@gmail.com, but got a new
address j...@apache.org
On 12/11/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
FOSDEM 2013 will be held in Brussels, Belgium, 2-3 Feb 2013 and it is a
huge, free, developer-oriented, technical conference. OpenOffice has
three opportunities to be featured there.
Quick status update below.
1) The Apache OpenOffice devroom. This is what
[re-reply since original message was moderated]
On 11/19/2012 11:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
abhilash alwandi wrote:
Dear all Volunteers,Am Abhilash Alwandi.Am from Banglore(INDIA).Am
interested in testing the Apache OpenOffice.
Welcome! If you wish to help with testing you should subscribe
Hello i'm Emanuel Avalos, from mexico, 22years old.
My abilities are:
Java
Android
UI designer
HTML5, CSS.
PHP
I am interested in learning more about application development, and
interact with a large community.
--
*Emanuel Avalos Ramón*
Ing.Sistemas Computacionales.
Celular: 9932314446
Sure!
Peter
On 11/20/2012 9:28 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
I'm not a Linux User (my last Linux experience were years ago)... But Can I
also join?
- Simon
2012/11/20 Ji Yan
Attractive event, I'll be there.
2012/11/20 Chao Huang
What an expected party in Beijing ! Thanks!
2012/11/20 Pete
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=call_for_marketing_volunteers
On 11/20/2012 04:08 PM, Emanuel Avalos wrote:
Hello i'm Emanuel Avalos, from mexico, 22years old.
My abilities are:
Java
Android
UI designer
HTML5, CSS.
PHP
I am interested in learning more about application development, and
interact with a large community.
Hello Emanuel and thanks for join
Hi Folks,
It is possible that we can get either a www.openoffice.org, a *.openoffice.org,
or other specific .openoffice.org certificates.
There are older browsers where the apache.org certificate will take precedence
for sites.
Does the project care to have an SSL certificate on www.openoffice
On 11/20/2012 06:46 AM, tj wrote:
Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts
on a ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
Oh, please do It looked to me more like it was about three a minute
in the wee hours of the morning.
Any Administrator ("sysop") c
Hi All,
saw this today
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9233890/German_city_dumps_OpenOffice_switches_to_Microsoft?source=CTWNLE_nlt_pm_2012-11-20
Maybe an upgrade from 3.2 would help them?
--
Cheers,
Ian C
Here's the response from LO referenced in the story:
http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2012/11/16/open-letter-to-the-city-of-freiburg/
On 11/20/2012 5:16 PM, Ian C wrote:
Hi All,
saw this today
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9233890/German_city_dumps_OpenOffice_switches_to_Microsoft?s
On 11/21/2012 8:20 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=call_for_marketing_volunteers
Thanks. The only thing that I would add is "... and follow the
instructions of the automatic reply " to "Subscribe to our public
Marketing mailing list by sending an email
On 11/20/2012 20:10, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 11/20/2012 06:46 AM, tj wrote:
Can I get lazy consensus on requiring users to request Mwiki accounts
on a ML? Temporarily or permanently, I don't know.
Oh, please do It looked to me more like it was about three a minute
in the wee hou
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=call_for_marketing_volunteers
A minor point about "perhaps second only to Linux and Firefox". Can
OpenOffice be second to two other products? How about "perhaps outdone
only by Linux and Firefox
On 11/20/12 9:22 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> Rob Weir wrote:
This is mainly a community-relations / public outreach idea. I
noticed that when we do a blog post we get a lot o
On 11/15/12 1:55 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 14/11/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> copied and pasted into an e-mail, see other announcements ...
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/FOSDEM+2013+CFP
>> is just for writing/reviewing this text. Link won't be published.
>
> Remin
Updated the patch according to the comments...Please review
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=79931&action=diff.Thanks.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Herbert Dürr wrote:
> I agree with Pedro that the change history belongs into the RCS,
> especially in a code base as ours where s
On 11/13/12 7:21 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>
> On 11/13/2012 2:05 AM, RA Stehmann wrote:
>> Am 12.11.2012 21:53, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> FOSDEM 2013 will be held in Brussels, Belgium, 2-3 Feb 2013 and it is a
>>> huge, free, developer-oriented, technical conference. OpenOffice has
>>> three oppo
58 matches
Mail list logo
