Hi Tom,
If you not in the hurry, I will start to do the Wiki this weekend, otherwise
just tell me and I will try my best to speed you up here.
Frédéric THOMAS
member the name of the framework.
Chris
Von: omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2015 23:10
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>
> >1) I’m looking to adapt the business
OK, I rushed through (mostly from memory) an update of that status page.
Give it a try and see if it works.
-Alex
On 7/22/15, 2:02 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Ah, crud. I forgot about that page. It is two years stale.
>
>Try working from the READMEs in the falcon and asjs repos. At least
>that’
This conversation probably deserves a new topic
Mike
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:10 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> >
> > >1) I’m looking to adapt the business logic part so it’ll cross-compile
> > >into Javascript, pretty much as-is. I expect to have to work on some of
> > >the capabilities
>
> >1) I’m looking to adapt the business logic part so it’ll cross-compile
> >into Javascript, pretty much as-is. I expect to have to work on some of
> >the capabilities and classes to make them cross-compilable. XML
> >processing is one example.
>
> Is there no way to convert to using JSON instea
We looked into using d.ts files, but then found it easier to use externs
from here:
https://github.com/google/closure-compiler/wiki/Externs-For-Common-Librarie
s
Easel is not on the list, but it might be possible for you to create it.
-Alex
On 7/22/15, 2:05 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Or this?
>https
Or this?
https://github.com/borisyankov/DefinitelyTyped/tree/master/easeljs
On Jul 23, 2015, at 12:02 AM, Harbs wrote:
> You mean this?
> https://www.nuget.org/packages/easeljs.TypeScript.DefinitelyTyped/
>
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 11:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>> Well, if there is an extern
You mean this?
https://www.nuget.org/packages/easeljs.TypeScript.DefinitelyTyped/
On Jul 22, 2015, at 11:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Well, if there is an externs file for Easel, we can create the SWCs pretty
> easily and you won’t have to know learn about it.
Ah, crud. I forgot about that page. It is two years stale.
Try working from the READMEs in the falcon and asjs repos. At least
that’s only a year old.
-Alex
On 7/22/15, 1:53 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Well, I went through steps 1 through 6 here:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Fl
On 7/22/15, 1:49 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>On Jul 22, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 7/22/15, 1:36 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>>
>>> Makes sense.
>>>
>>> From my perspective, here’s what I’m looking to do:
>>>
>>> I have a rather large application which has a pretty clean divide
Well, I went through steps 1 through 6 here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexJS+Status
I got an error when trying to run ant on frameworks/as (I need that
local.properties file)
And the Falcon.jx failed as well. No idea why.
I’m finished for the day. I’ll give this a go aga
On Jul 22, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/22/15, 1:36 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> Makes sense.
>>
>> From my perspective, here’s what I’m looking to do:
>>
>> I have a rather large application which has a pretty clean divide between
>> business logic and view.
>>
>> 1) I’m lo
On 7/22/15, 1:39 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>This is what I’m counting on. I could use some help getting started
>though.
>
>If someone can help me with the baby steps, I’m sure I’ll be up to
>walking and running in no time… ;-)
Well, grab the repo, and see if the README can get you to the point of
co
On 7/22/15, 1:36 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Makes sense.
>
>From my perspective, here’s what I’m looking to do:
>
>I have a rather large application which has a pretty clean divide between
>business logic and view.
>
>1) I’m looking to adapt the business logic part so it’ll cross-compile
>into Javascr
This is what I’m counting on. I could use some help getting started though.
If someone can help me with the baby steps, I’m sure I’ll be up to walking and
running in no time… ;-)
On Jul 22, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> For sure, there are lots of bugs and missing features so you won’
ect
>> / 1 build configuration in IntelliJ) as soon as COMPILE:JS and COMPILE:AS3
>> were defined to AUTO which would eliminate the need to define the js output
>> type as I could infer it.
>>> Anyway, I guess this would deserve another wiki page than the one
>> mentioned before.
>>>
>&
MPILE:JS and COMPILE:AS3 were defined to AUTO which would eliminate
>>the need to define the js output type as I could infer it.
>> Anyway, I guess this would deserve another wiki page than the one
>>mentioned before.
>>
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>>
AS3
> were defined to AUTO which would eliminate the need to define the js output
> type as I could infer it.
> > Anyway, I guess this would deserve another wiki page than the one
> mentioned before.
> >
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >
> > --
ed to define the js output type as I
> could infer it.
> Anyway, I guess this would deserve another wiki page than the one mentioned
> before.
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
>> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>> From:
Frédéric THOMAS
> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> From: harbs.li...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:50:02 +0300
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> This discussion was incredibly long and I had trouble following how to get
> going.
>
> I
This discussion was incredibly long and I had trouble following how to get
going.
I’m trying to set myself up with FlexJS for the first time. I’d like to figure
out how I can develop working off the repo so I can work on the SDK while I go.
Since I’m first starting with FlexJS, I’d like to try
---
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:47:24 +
>
> FlexJS should work in AIR as well. I believe at least one example uses
> AIR. The key issue here is that it lo
;web application.
>
>How is FlexJS supposed to with in AIR ?
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
>> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 01:48:27 -0700
>> From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re :
application.
How is FlexJS supposed to with in AIR ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 01:48:27 -0700
> From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Int
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47996.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Alex,
Jira filled -> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34892
Thanks,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47945.h
/images.devs-on.net/Image/EW1mNkuX76gxcUMH-Obszar.png
>[2] http://images.devs-on.net/Image/8T08aAVeUftNosFb-Cayekran.png
>
>Piotr
>
>
>
>-
>Apache Flex PMC
>piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nab
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47934.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gt; On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <
> webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Well, looking at it better, we probably have everything we need with
> our
> > > OOP mechanism for not having to use it.
> > >
> > >
ntext:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47931.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.__proto__ then it really doesn't
> matter.
> > >>>
> > >>> But we cannot call this true JS until we allow natively these
> > properties
> > >>> and methods of ES3 and ES5 IMO.
> > >>>
> > >>> That is why
to use it.
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
> > From: aha...@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [FlaconJX] JS.swc design problems (was [FlexJS] IntelliJ
> Integration)
> > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:36:16
this.
>>>
>>> I got a busy 2 weeks coming up, I have a lot of remodeling for my
>>>mother in
>>> law to do so I won't have as much time as I did these last 3 weeks, also
>>> why I busted my ass, so people could have something to try out.
>>>
o bite the bullet and
>>implement
>> this.
>>
>> I got a busy 2 weeks coming up, I have a lot of remodeling for my
>>mother in
>> law to do so I won't have as much time as I did these last 3 weeks, also
>> why I busted my ass, so people could ha
>>
>> I got a busy 2 weeks coming up, I have a lot of remodeling for my mother
>> in
>> law to do so I won't have as much time as I did these last 3 weeks, also
>> why I busted my ass, so people could have something to try out.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>&
ould just include an empty Object and then it would
> > >> matter in IJ.
> > >>
> > >> Still the emitter will need to know about JSObject to transform it
> back
> > to
> > >> Object during cross compile.
> > >>
> > >>
obe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:32:38 +
>
> Is there a way to get IJ to tell us which SWCs are in the library-path vs
> the external-library-path? I’m wondering if this can
these last 3 weeks, also
why I busted my ass, so people could have something to try out.
Mike
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:22:06 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FlaconJX] JS.swc design problems (was [FlexJS]
NG in JS.swc only, right ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:22:06 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FlaconJX] JS.swc design problems (was [FlexJS] IntelliJ
> Integration)
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> O
t; >> playerglobal/airglobal will IJ pick it up?
>> >>
>> >
>> > I would bet it wouldn't.
>>
>> IJ would allow writing (without hints) and compile, due to the dynamic
>> nature of Object.
>>
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
t, For Array I can do
Array.isArray() with completion.
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:20:29 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FlaconJX] JS.swc design problems (was [FlexJS] IntelliJ
> Integration)
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To
dynamic
> nature of Object.
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ------------
> > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:51:09 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FlaconJX] JS.swc design problems (was [FlexJS] IntelliJ
> Integration)
> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.co
ck it up?
>>
>
> I would bet it wouldn't.
IJ would allow writing (without hints) and compile, due to the dynamic nature
of Object.
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:51:09 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FlaconJX] JS.swc design
ly answer when a bug is filled by now and don't fix it
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FlaconJX] JS.swc design problems (was [FlexJS] IntelliJ
> Integration)
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/17/15, 7:20 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
> >> Fred; The point is, you would have to rename every package level class
> >>to
> >> not get an ambiguous error in the IDE.
> >
> >Yes, but I guess it should be done for Object as there a
the compiler option set to Mxmlc/Compc tells
>something that could give a clue ?
>
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 07:00:55 -0700
>> From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject:
: Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>
> As I said I have removed it and build pass, but I'm having this issue once
> I'm trying to launch swf version of app. - I don't know why. [1] :(
>
> This is for sure not the solution - getting buildable p
On 6/17/15, 7:20 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>> Fred; The point is, you would have to rename every package level class
>>to
>> not get an ambiguous error in the IDE.
>
>Yes, but I guess it should be done for Object as there are no way to get
>it in IJ as it has a hardcoded definition, the JSOb
tE2p-Obszar.png
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47902.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ut you ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:16:24 -0400
> Subject: [FlaconJX] JS.swc design problems (was [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration)
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
>>! Still having things at the
.org
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 05:18:06 +
>
> Thanks for fixing the slash. I wonder how the build did not fail? That’s
> kind of disturbing.
>
> IMO, if you are building MXML + AS apps that run in SWF
zyck...@gmail.com
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-
>AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47895.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rs for
swf described above.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47895.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:34 -0700
> > From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> >
> > Ok js version is working now with new build, but for the swf build I'm
> still
> > getting error [1]:
> &
Have you tried to compile with js.swc to swf ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 12:28:34 -0700
> From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integrati
-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47891.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47890.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hahah I saw your conversation with Mike after I posted mine. ;)
Thank you Fred, Mike! :)
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47879.html
: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>
> Thanks Fred. That was it!
>
> I was able to build after remove JS.swc, but in general something is wrong
> with the compilation.
> I've tried it on two examples "DataBindingTest" and "DataGridExample".
>
&
tarted to work.
>
> [1] http://images.devs-on.net/Image/34OZOpM8gIUatE2p-Obszar.png
> [2] http://images.devs-on.net/Image/GW7vP55VHDdgl65a-Obszar.png
>
>
>
> -
> Apache Flex PMC
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apac
com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47875.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ression literal
>
> DataBindingTest.js:46: goog.require('org_apache_flex_utils_Language');/n
>
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Re : Re:
expression literal
DataBindingTest.js:46: goog.require('org_apache_flex_utils_Language');/n
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integra
.org
> Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 19:23:45 +0100
>
>> It seems IntelliJ try to find Mxmlc thru compc.jar, I added
> compc.jar only to make it able to compile libs in certain situations.
>>
>>
>
rebuild 2
before it really apply
Thanks for reporting.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:53:56 +
RL+ALT+Y to synchronize the conf files, rebuild.
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 22:47:34 -0700
> From: piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>
--
> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 05:53:17 -0400
> Subject: [FlexJS] Intellij integration
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> Hi,
>
> For those trying to get FlexJS nightly working with IJ, Fred posted these
> steps, I think Alex is working on
Hi,
For those trying to get FlexJS nightly working with IJ, Fred posted these
steps, I think Alex is working on getting files copied in builds coming up.
Note; I had to copy mx-manifest.xml over into the flexjs frameworks to.
Mike
So, from there, fdb.jar is missing as well as the
ide\IDEA\intel
AW-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47864.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
essage in context:
>http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-
>AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47862.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Re-Re-Re-Re-Re-AW-AW-AW-FlexJS-IntelliJ-Integration-tp47695p47862.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Latest Nightly looks like it has fdb.jar and mxml-2009-manifest.xml in it.
Let me know if there are still issues.
On 6/15/15, 6:02 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 6/15/15, 5:49 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
>>The config.xml is here
>>https://gist.github.com/doublefx/5a2c20704fcc102428c6 and I
On 6/15/15, 3:00 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Hmm, Can you post an example of what that looks like when your try it?
>
>I have a few thoughts but I want to see what you write before I say
>anything.
Below is the way HTTPService is looking right now (with lots removed).
The header, package, s
On 6/15/15, 5:49 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>The config.xml is here
>https://gist.github.com/doublefx/5a2c20704fcc102428c6 and I placed it to
>ide\IDEA\intellij-config.xml
Fred, can you check that in yourself so we have a cleaner Git history?
Thanks,
-Alex
Hmm, Can you post an example of what that looks like when your try it?
I have a few thoughts but I want to see what you write before I say
anything.
Mike
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/15/15, 1:51 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>
> >Now as a tool developer, seein
On 6/15/15, 1:51 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Now as a tool developer, seeing it used is the greatest! Thanks Fred, must
>feel pretty weird writing DOM creation with ActionScript, haha. :)
It does feel weird. I spent some time trying to port HTTPService.js back
to the AS equivalent. Next i
2015 16:57:03 -0400
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> Fred did you notice the global functions? alert() is global. Did you write
> window.alert() for a specific reason? Just c
and even in IntelliJ now :-)
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:51:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> On
Fred did you notice the global functions? alert() is global. Did you write
window.alert() for a specific reason? Just curious.
Mike
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 6/15/15, 12:35 PM, "Frédéric THOMA
pretty weird writing DOM creation with ActionScript, haha. :)
Mike
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:48:04 -0400
> > Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > From: te
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/15/15, 12:35 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
> >
> >> The only thing I had to delete was that stupid / character, that must
> >>be an
> >> emitter bug,
> >
> >Yeah, a pain..
>
> My fault, I pushed the fix.
>
Thanks Alex.
Mike
>
>
On 6/15/15, 12:35 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
>> The only thing I had to delete was that stupid / character, that must
>>be an
>> emitter bug,
>
>Yeah, a pain..
My fault, I pushed the fix.
-Alex
commit the change and it should show up in the SWC's Window class.
Yeah, that's why I said hmm :-)
Thanks for having added that, will be useful !!
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:52:23 -0400
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re:
r too I guess
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I already commited that change, if you rebuild falcon, it will rebuild the
>> SWC and get it from;
>>
>> .../git\flex-falcon\compiler.jx.tests\temp\externals\bin\JS>swc
>>
>>
>>
>>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
how up in the SWC's Window class.
>
> Mike
>
>
>>
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>> --------
>> > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:45:43 -0400
>> > Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>&
0, I will add it and
commit the change and it should show up in the SWC's Window class.
Mike
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:45:43 -0400
> > Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ In
Hmm, I found that https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/Web/API/Window/document
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:45:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail
et it from;
>
> .../git\flex-falcon\compiler.jx.tests\temp\externals\bin\JS>swc
>
>
>
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>> --------
>> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
>> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> > Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: A
temp\externals\bin\JS.swc
> >
> > You don't need to do that, add it as a normal dependency of your module
> and mark it as external instead of merge, it's easier !!
> >
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >
> >
> >> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2
t;
> > You don't need to do that, add it as a normal dependency of your module
> and mark it as external instead of merge, it's easier !!
> >
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >
> >
> >> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:31:46 -0400
> >> Subject: Re: Re : Re:
tmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:35:37 +0100
>
>> Fred, this works for me;
>
> Damn, thanks :-)
>
>> The only thing I had to delete was that stupid / character,
al dependency of your module
> and mark it as external instead of merge, it's easier !!
>
I tried that and it didn't seem to work. I will try it again.
Mike
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----
> > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 201
> JS.swc window.document doesn't exist
Why ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:35:37 +
>> Application was to replace in the generated js, this.document with
>> window.document and had still some error reported because of the initial
>> view.
>>
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: aha.
2015 14:54:06 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FlaconJX] JS.swc design problems (was [FlexJS] IntelliJ
> Integration)
> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >
> > Ok, Fine 2 people say don't worry about it, so I won't. :)
> >
> >
tion was to replace in the generated js, this.document with
> window.document and had still some error reported because of the initial
> view.
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----
> > From: aha...@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apach
> Make does the compile without a problem. :)
Does it render ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:54:06 -0400
> Subject: Re: [FlaconJX] JS.swc design problems (was [FlexJS] IntelliJ
> Integration)
> From: teotigraphix...@gmai
e initial view.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:04:06 +
>
> Hmm. Why are you extending from Sprite? You can’t use any low-level
AS3 has the same issue as JS when root package and custom packages have
classes with the same name. It's just that JS has more things in the root
package. I don't think any special solution is needed.
- Josh
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Michael Schmalle <
teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Ok, Fine 2 people say don't worry about it, so I won't. :)
BTW Josh, Fred and I have been working with IntelliJ and this compiles in
IJ with the FlexJSNightly compiler using the JS.swc as an external library.
Make does the compile without a problem. :)
AS
https://gist.github.com/teotigraphix/ff16
1 - 100 of 420 matches
Mail list logo
