Ok Fred, I comitted and tested in IJ, window.document now comes up and its type HTMLDocument. :)
Mike On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Hmm, I found that >> https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/Web/API/Window/document >> >> > Yeah I know but did your read; > > DOM Level 0. Not part of specification. > > That is probably why it's not in the externs for dom0, I will add it and > commit the change and it should show up in the SWC's Window class. > > Mike > > >> >> Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >> ---------------------------------------- >> > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:45:43 -0400 >> > Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Frédéric THOMAS < >> webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> >> >>> JS.swc window.document doesn't exist >> >> >> >> Why ? >> >> >> > >> > Well everything is being parsed by the externs, so it must not be >> defined >> > in the files I am parsing. I will look to see if there is an extension >> dom >> > file that I missed that defines it, other wise I can just put the >> > definition in the missing.js file and it will include it. >> > >> > Mike >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------- >> >>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> >>> Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ >> Integration >> >>> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:35:37 +0100 >> >>> >> >>>> Fred, this works for me; >> >>> >> >>> Damn, thanks :-) >> >>> >> >>>> The only thing I had to delete was that stupid / character, that must >> >> be an >> >>>> emitter bug, >> >>> >> >>> Yeah, a pain.. >> >>> >> >>>> I also just added >> >>>> >> >> >> -external-library-path=C:\Users\Teoti\Documents\ApacheFlex\git\flex-falcon\compiler.jx.tests\temp\externals\bin\JS.swc >> >>> >> >>> You don't need to do that, add it as a normal dependency of your >> module >> >> and mark it as external instead of merge, it's easier !! >> >>> >> >>> Frédéric THOMAS >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ---------------------------------------- >> >>>> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:31:46 -0400 >> >>>> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ >> Integration >> >>>> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com >> >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> >>>> >> >>>> Fred, this works for me; >> >>>> >> >>>> AS >> >>>> https://gist.github.com/teotigraphix/32fe584b9e0fd0bbf8f6 >> >>>> >> >>>> JS >> >>>> https://gist.github.com/teotigraphix/c301463185bb62aa7853 >> >>>> >> >>>> The only thing I had to delete was that stupid / character, that must >> >> be an >> >>>> emitter bug, and the call to Main.start(), It showed a blue table! >> It's >> >>>> missing the rows, but I think you forgot a call or something, but the >> >>>> header and footer render fine. >> >>>> >> >>>> http://snag.gy/eWqEz.jpg >> >>>> >> >>>> I also just added >> >>>> >> >> >> -external-library-path=C:\Users\Teoti\Documents\ApacheFlex\git\flex-falcon\compiler.jx.tests\temp\externals\bin\JS.swc >> >>>> >> >>>> to additional compiler arguments. >> >>>> >> >>>> Mike >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Frédéric THOMAS < >> >> webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>> Hmm. Why are you extending from Sprite? You can’t use any low-level >> >>>>>> Flash stuff in FlexJS. We should probably add a compiler option to >> >> warn >> >>>>>> on that. DataBindingTest_as extends from >> >>>>>> org.apache.flex.core.Application. It is all about abstractions. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I did that for 2 reasons: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> 1- Application define document and JS.swc window.document doesn't >> >> exist, >> >>>>> so the this.document application wrapper is used and I can't do >> >> anything I >> >>>>> want with this.document with the DOM >> >>>>> >> >>>>> 2- Application needs an initialView, etc.... I don't want to provide >> >> that. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I've seen HTMLElementWrapper, maybe it could be extended to create a >> >>>>> SimpleJSApplcation ? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The only way I made my as / js html table render using JS.swc and >> >>>>> Application was to replace in the generated js, this.document with >> >>>>> window.document and had still some error reported because of the >> >> initial >> >>>>> view. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Frédéric THOMAS >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ---------------------------------------- >> >>>>>> From: aha...@adobe.com >> >>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ >> >> Integration >> >>>>>> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:04:06 +0000 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Hmm. Why are you extending from Sprite? You can’t use any low-level >> >>>>>> Flash stuff in FlexJS. We should probably add a compiler option to >> >> warn >> >>>>>> on that. DataBindingTest_as extends from >> >>>>>> org.apache.flex.core.Application. It is all about abstractions. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> -Alex >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On 6/15/15, 10:51 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Up to you, but I don’t think I’d be able to get FB to do that. >> >> IMO, >> >>>>>>>>>>there >> >>>>>>>>>> are Flex(MXML) projects and AS projects. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>In FB, we can create an AS projects with FlexJS as SDK ? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Haven’t tried it, but should work since they should just be >> >> third-party >> >>>>>>>> libs. You can create an AS-only (no MXML) FlexJS app. See >> >>>>>>>> examples/DataBindingTest_as >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>I didn't try DataBindingTest_as yet but tried this >> >>>>>>>https://gist.github.com/doublefx/b380b6deeb5094e31f43 and got >> >> compiled >> >>>>> to >> >>>>>>>this https://gist.github.com/doublefx/af83fae1e1ee54acbc23 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>Even removing the weird extra "\" at the end of >> >>>>>>>goog.require('org_apache_flex_utils_Language');\ >> >>>>>>>Chrome complained because: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>Main.base(this, 'constructor'); // Uncaught TypeError: >> >>>>>>>Main.base is not a function >> >>>>>>>goog.inherits(Main, flash_display_Sprite); // Uncaught >> ReferenceError: >> >>>>>>>flash_display_Sprite is not defined >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>Any clue ? >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>Frédéric THOMAS >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>---------------------------------------- >> >>>>>>>> From: aha...@adobe.com >> >>>>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ >> >>>>> Integration >> >>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:40:01 +0000 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On 6/15/15, 9:45 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Up to you, but I don’t think I’d be able to get FB to do that. >> >> IMO, >> >>>>>>>>>>there >> >>>>>>>>>> are Flex(MXML) projects and AS projects. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>In FB, we can create an AS projects with FlexJS as SDK ? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Haven’t tried it, but should work since they should just be >> >> third-party >> >>>>>>>> libs. You can create an AS-only (no MXML) FlexJS app. See >> >>>>>>>> examples/DataBindingTest_as >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> -Alex >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
