Let me know when you get it working.

Mike

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> >> Fred, this works for me;
>> >
>> > Damn, thanks :-)
>>
>> Still doesn't work because of the Object's constructor, but once you'll
>> have it committed, I'll be able to render too I guess
>>
>>
>
> I already commited that change, if you rebuild falcon, it will rebuild the
> SWC and get it from;
>
> .../git\flex-falcon\compiler.jx.tests\temp\externals\bin\JS>swc
>
>
>
>> Frédéric THOMAS
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
>> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> > Subject: RE: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
>> > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:35:37 +0100
>> >
>> >> Fred, this works for me;
>> >
>> > Damn, thanks :-)
>> >
>> >> The only thing I had to delete was that stupid / character, that must
>> be an
>> >> emitter bug,
>> >
>> > Yeah, a pain..
>> >
>> >> I also just added
>> >>
>> -external-library-path=C:\Users\Teoti\Documents\ApacheFlex\git\flex-falcon\compiler.jx.tests\temp\externals\bin\JS.swc
>> >
>> > You don't need to do that, add it as a normal dependency of your module
>> and mark it as external instead of merge, it's easier !!
>> >
>> > Frédéric THOMAS
>> >
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------
>> >> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:31:46 -0400
>> >> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ
>> Integration
>> >> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
>> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >>
>> >> Fred, this works for me;
>> >>
>> >> AS
>> >> https://gist.github.com/teotigraphix/32fe584b9e0fd0bbf8f6
>> >>
>> >> JS
>> >> https://gist.github.com/teotigraphix/c301463185bb62aa7853
>> >>
>> >> The only thing I had to delete was that stupid / character, that must
>> be an
>> >> emitter bug, and the call to Main.start(), It showed a blue table! It's
>> >> missing the rows, but I think you forgot a call or something, but the
>> >> header and footer render fine.
>> >>
>> >> http://snag.gy/eWqEz.jpg
>> >>
>> >> I also just added
>> >>
>> -external-library-path=C:\Users\Teoti\Documents\ApacheFlex\git\flex-falcon\compiler.jx.tests\temp\externals\bin\JS.swc
>> >>
>> >> to additional compiler arguments.
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <
>> webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> Hmm. Why are you extending from Sprite? You can’t use any low-level
>> >>>> Flash stuff in FlexJS. We should probably add a compiler option to
>> warn
>> >>>> on that. DataBindingTest_as extends from
>> >>>> org.apache.flex.core.Application. It is all about abstractions.
>> >>>
>> >>> I did that for 2 reasons:
>> >>>
>> >>> 1- Application define document and JS.swc window.document doesn't
>> exist,
>> >>> so the this.document application wrapper is used and I can't do
>> anything I
>> >>> want with this.document with the DOM
>> >>>
>> >>> 2- Application needs an initialView, etc.... I don't want to provide
>> that.
>> >>>
>> >>> I've seen HTMLElementWrapper, maybe it could be extended to create a
>> >>> SimpleJSApplcation ?
>> >>>
>> >>> The only way I made my as / js html table render using JS.swc and
>> >>> Application was to replace in the generated js, this.document with
>> >>> window.document and had still some error reported because of the
>> initial
>> >>> view.
>> >>>
>> >>> Frédéric THOMAS
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ----------------------------------------
>> >>>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >>>> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ
>> Integration
>> >>>> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:04:06 +0000
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hmm. Why are you extending from Sprite? You can’t use any low-level
>> >>>> Flash stuff in FlexJS. We should probably add a compiler option to
>> warn
>> >>>> on that. DataBindingTest_as extends from
>> >>>> org.apache.flex.core.Application. It is all about abstractions.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Alex
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 6/15/15, 10:51 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Up to you, but I don’t think I’d be able to get FB to do that.
>> IMO,
>> >>>>>>>>there
>> >>>>>>>> are Flex(MXML) projects and AS projects.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>In FB, we can create an AS projects with FlexJS as SDK ?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Haven’t tried it, but should work since they should just be
>> third-party
>> >>>>>> libs. You can create an AS-only (no MXML) FlexJS app. See
>> >>>>>> examples/DataBindingTest_as
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>I didn't try DataBindingTest_as yet but tried this
>> >>>>>https://gist.github.com/doublefx/b380b6deeb5094e31f43 and got
>> compiled
>> >>> to
>> >>>>>this https://gist.github.com/doublefx/af83fae1e1ee54acbc23
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Even removing the weird extra "\" at the end of
>> >>>>>goog.require('org_apache_flex_utils_Language');\
>> >>>>>Chrome complained because:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Main.base(this, 'constructor'); // Uncaught TypeError:
>> >>>>>Main.base is not a function
>> >>>>>goog.inherits(Main, flash_display_Sprite); // Uncaught
>> ReferenceError:
>> >>>>>flash_display_Sprite is not defined
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Any clue ?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Frédéric THOMAS
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>----------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> >>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ
>> >>> Integration
>> >>>>>> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:40:01 +0000
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 6/15/15, 9:45 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Up to you, but I don’t think I’d be able to get FB to do that.
>> IMO,
>> >>>>>>>>there
>> >>>>>>>> are Flex(MXML) projects and AS projects.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>In FB, we can create an AS projects with FlexJS as SDK ?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Haven’t tried it, but should work since they should just be
>> third-party
>> >>>>>> libs. You can create an AS-only (no MXML) FlexJS app. See
>> >>>>>> examples/DataBindingTest_as
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to