> Fred; The point is, you would have to rename every package level class to
> not get an ambiguous error in the IDE.
Yes, but I guess it should be done for Object as there are no way to get it in
IJ as it has a hardcoded definition, the JSObject option seems good to me, what
about you ?
Frédéric THOMAS
----------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:16:24 -0400
> Subject: [FlaconJX] JS.swc design problems (was [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration)
> From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
>>!!!!! Still having things at the root package level is going to cause
>>problems, I think we need a solution to this, the CustomEvent and Event
>>ambiguous warnings shows its probably going to mess things up.
>
> Can you give me an example? If you are using JS.SWC, what other swc is
> going to define CustomEvent and Event? Again, the set of SWCs has to be
> different for different targets.
>
> Well it happens if you want to use FlexJS and include DOM calls. Even if
> you don't want to use SWF, CustomEvent is a DOM event class and at the
> package level, so in IJ, it can't resolve CustomEvent in the class code
> without it being qualified org.apache.flex.events.CustomEvent.
>
> Fred; The point is, you would have to rename every package level class to
> not get an ambiguous error in the IDE.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> Mike
