Fred, this works for me; AS https://gist.github.com/teotigraphix/32fe584b9e0fd0bbf8f6
JS https://gist.github.com/teotigraphix/c301463185bb62aa7853 The only thing I had to delete was that stupid / character, that must be an emitter bug, and the call to Main.start(), It showed a blue table! It's missing the rows, but I think you forgot a call or something, but the header and footer render fine. http://snag.gy/eWqEz.jpg I also just added -external-library-path=C:\Users\Teoti\Documents\ApacheFlex\git\flex-falcon\compiler.jx.tests\temp\externals\bin\JS.swc to additional compiler arguments. Mike On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hmm. Why are you extending from Sprite? You can’t use any low-level > > Flash stuff in FlexJS. We should probably add a compiler option to warn > > on that. DataBindingTest_as extends from > > org.apache.flex.core.Application. It is all about abstractions. > > I did that for 2 reasons: > > 1- Application define document and JS.swc window.document doesn't exist, > so the this.document application wrapper is used and I can't do anything I > want with this.document with the DOM > > 2- Application needs an initialView, etc.... I don't want to provide that. > > I've seen HTMLElementWrapper, maybe it could be extended to create a > SimpleJSApplcation ? > > The only way I made my as / js html table render using JS.swc and > Application was to replace in the generated js, this.document with > window.document and had still some error reported because of the initial > view. > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > ---------------------------------------- > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:04:06 +0000 > > > > Hmm. Why are you extending from Sprite? You can’t use any low-level > > Flash stuff in FlexJS. We should probably add a compiler option to warn > > on that. DataBindingTest_as extends from > > org.apache.flex.core.Application. It is all about abstractions. > > > > -Alex > > > > On 6/15/15, 10:51 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>> Up to you, but I don’t think I’d be able to get FB to do that. IMO, > >>>>>there > >>>>> are Flex(MXML) projects and AS projects. > >>>> > >>>>In FB, we can create an AS projects with FlexJS as SDK ? > >>> > >>> Haven’t tried it, but should work since they should just be third-party > >>> libs. You can create an AS-only (no MXML) FlexJS app. See > >>> examples/DataBindingTest_as > >> > >>I didn't try DataBindingTest_as yet but tried this > >>https://gist.github.com/doublefx/b380b6deeb5094e31f43 and got compiled > to > >>this https://gist.github.com/doublefx/af83fae1e1ee54acbc23 > >> > >>Even removing the weird extra "\" at the end of > >>goog.require('org_apache_flex_utils_Language');\ > >>Chrome complained because: > >> > >>Main.base(this, 'constructor'); // Uncaught TypeError: > >>Main.base is not a function > >>goog.inherits(Main, flash_display_Sprite); // Uncaught ReferenceError: > >>flash_display_Sprite is not defined > >> > >>Any clue ? > >> > >>Frédéric THOMAS > >> > >> > >>---------------------------------------- > >>> From: aha...@adobe.com > >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ > Integration > >>> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:40:01 +0000 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 6/15/15, 9:45 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>>>> Up to you, but I don’t think I’d be able to get FB to do that. IMO, > >>>>>there > >>>>> are Flex(MXML) projects and AS projects. > >>>> > >>>>In FB, we can create an AS projects with FlexJS as SDK ? > >>> > >>> Haven’t tried it, but should work since they should just be third-party > >>> libs. You can create an AS-only (no MXML) FlexJS app. See > >>> examples/DataBindingTest_as > >>> > >>> -Alex > >>> > >>> > >> > > > >
