On 6/17/15, 7:20 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Fred; The point is, you would have to rename every package level class
>>to
>> not get an ambiguous error in the IDE.
>
>Yes, but I guess it should be done for Object as there are no way to get
>it in IJ as it has a hardcoded definition, the JSObject option seems good
>to me, what about you ?
Wouldn’t that mess up inheritance from everything that extends Object?
Can I get a more detailed technical understanding of this issue? How does
IJ have a hard coded definition? Is this just for code completion in the
editor or is it compile time as well? I would think that if they are
calling our compiler that we could control this issue. Is this a bug
worth filing against IJ? If Adobe adds something to Object in
playerglobal/airglobal will IJ pick it up?
-Alex
