So Niall, whats next and please if there is anything I can help in let
me know about it.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> Niall, any update on the voting?
>
> The vote passed on Nov 24th:
>
> http://markmail.org/messa
Sorry I reviewed the proposal few days ago and forgot to vote here.
+1
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Will be good to have a member of the JSR-303 EG in the community!
> I've added your name to the proposal.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Gerhard Petracek wrote:
>>
>> hi donald,
>>
+1 on the proposal :)
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>>
>>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
build a community around any JSR-303 implementation we create and
> having someone join from day one who has been working on JSR-303 since April
> 2008, would be a great asset to have on-board.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
>>
>> Hi...
>&g
Hi...
IMO, and sorry for saying that, now we've been transformed from
thinking about the project on how to get Roman involved in code
submission. IMO if this has no solution to be taken to get things up
and running fast enough so either Ron accepts that situation, or we
start doing it the way N
Seems not :(, wdyt should we go the way Niall started ?
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>>
>>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>>
Hi Niall...
I think we need to know your comment on that as you are the one who
started the thread and the effort related to what we started to
discuss on this thread :).
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>
> The only complication, is that we would
Hi Donald...
If moving the code of Agimatic into ASF going to be problematic why
not to start a clean room implementation as Niall suggested ?
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Hi Nail. I'm the one who created that copy of 1.4, so it's fine if we
> repurpose it, see VALI
+1
Actually this is even better to start from scratch. I am in Niall.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I don't have the rights to express votes but at least please let me
>
> Anyone can vote - it ma
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Mohammad Nour
> El-Din wrote:
>> I support either solution 1 or 2 from first section of solutions:
>>
>> 1- We will not be waiting for others till they decide whether donate
&g
You already created location for this Nial on SVN and Donal knows about it.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Niall
Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>>
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Everyone,
gt;> the load
>>> bounded resource would request a token before sending a query. This
>>> would
>>> enforce a maximum use rate.
>>>
>>> I could imagine a similar use of a semaphore as well.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 3:03 PM, M
e up to a small maximum. Threads wishing to consume the
>> load
>> bounded resource would request a token before sending a query. This would
>> enforce a maximum use rate.
>>
>> I could imagine a similar use of a semaphore as well.
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009
Sorry for the question, but why we need a new *concurrent* utils in
commons-lang while we have the concurrent package in Java SE 5 ?
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Oliver
Heger wrote:
> In my day job I have written a synchronization primitive that may be of
> interest for the proposed concurrent
I support either solution 1 or 2 from first section of solutions:
1- We will not be waiting for others till they decide whether donate
the code or not.
2- We will get more benefit for ASF as we may gain more committer to
join the community and help grow it more.
3- For the non-committers contrib
Hi All...
I am working on this JIRA VALIDATOR-274 -
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VALIDATOR-274 .
--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein
--
or architectural
> > discussion, links to the relevant projects, etc.
> >
> > I'm happy to help with getting this project started if needed (I'm also
> > a MyFaces committer).
>
> Good summary, thanks Simon!
>
> Niall
>
>
&g
Thanks a lot Henri :)
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > To be able to carry on this task I need a write access to the Apache
>
ext few days to start a design
> discussion on this list, or create some wiki pages for architectural
> discussion, links to the relevant projects, etc.
>
> I'm happy to help with getting this project started if needed (I'm also
> a MyFaces committer).
>
>
>
>
Hi All...
As per this thread -
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/102655 - I
contacted the development team of Apache Commons Validator -
http://commons.apache.org/validator/ - to discuss with them the
importance of implementing the Bean Validation JSR#303 -
http://jcp.org/
rchitectural
> discussion, links to the relevant projects, etc.
>
> I'm happy to help with getting this project started if needed (I'm also
> a MyFaces committer).
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> Mohammad Nour El-Din schrieb:
> > And u did it :( ???
And u did it :( ???
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Niall a lot. One last question for the sandbox project - if
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi simon...
> >
> > Thanks a lot :), but I like the idea of Naill, that is make a
> > sandbox project for Validator2, so I can
ers are happy with the
> general idea, I think it likely that you (and any other interested
> apache committers) would just be granted commit access to apply changes
> yourself.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> Mohammad Nour El-Din schrieb:
>
>
> > Sorry for the last
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I skimmed over the JSR - not a detailed look actually - and through
> > using annotations
d, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just to make sure, this is where trunk code exist
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/trunk/
> >
>
> Yes
>
> Niall
>
>
Just to make sure, this is where trunk code exist
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/trunk/
???
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I skimmed over the JSR - not a detailed look actually - and through
> using ann
more detailed look at JSR PDF and if I found
more info I will send them back by the end of this week.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
I've looked at the JIRA for Validator2, but I have one question, is it
going to be a full rewrite, or just going to adapt the already written
validators so it can be used through the JSR's proposed framework ?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nd you can see there is a Validator2 ticket list to implemetn
> JSR 303.
>
> Paul
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi All...
> >
> > Recently an EDR JSR#303 has been published
Hi All...
Recently an EDR JSR#303 has been published on JCP -
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 . They intend to make a unified
Bean Validation APIs/Framework based on using annotations and XML
configuration files, and they define the way how to apply and use
validation, and it will be part of
31 matches
Mail list logo
