Hi simon... Thanks a lot :), but I like the idea of Naill, that is make a sandbox project for Validator2, so I can work away from the release process of the current implementation of validator - Validator1, and when I have a working thing, we can get it out of sandbox to commons proper as part of the main Validator project, so people can have 2 falvours of Validator either 1/2. What do you think Naill ??
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mohammed, > > One of the purposes of the commons project is to pool the work of other > commons projects, ie extract bits out of other projects that can be more > widely applied. Therefore, the commons project is pretty open to > existing committers on other Apache projects getting commit access to > commons. > > As long as the PMC/existing validator developers are happy with the > general idea, I think it likely that you (and any other interested > apache committers) would just be granted commit access to apply changes > yourself. > > Regards, > Simon > > Mohammad Nour El-Din schrieb: > > > > Sorry for the last stupid question I could have know it from site, but > > one more - I hope not stupid - question, you will apply the Validator2 > > code in trunk and make old validator in a separate branch ??? > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Niall Pemberton > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > >> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Just to make sure, this is where trunk code exist > >>> > >> > > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/trunk/ > >> > > >> > >> Yes > >> > >> Niall > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > >> > > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > I skimmed over the JSR - not a detailed look actually - and through > >> > > using annotations you declare the validator class, so we can adapt > the > >> > > current validators, or at least make minor changes to make them > >> > > suitable to be used through JSR#303/Validator2 impl. I will > download > >> > > the code today and take a more detailed look at JSR PDF and if I > found > >> > > more info I will send them back by the end of this week. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Niall Pemberton > >> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > Hi All... > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Recently an EDR JSR#303 has been published on JCP - > >> > > > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 . They intend to make a > unified > >> > > > > Bean Validation APIs/Framework based on using annotations > and XML > >> > > > > configuration files, and they define the way how to apply > and use > >> > > > > validation, and it will be part of the Java Beans model. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I am a committer in Apache OpenEJB, and we need such > functionality for > >> > > > > bean validation through the process of deploying an > enterprise java > >> > > > > bean - we have a home made validation framework now. And I > have a > >> > > > > colleague of mine who is working in Apache MyFaces Tomahawk- > >> > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/index.html - and he is > interested > >> > > > > in such functionality to apply validation regarding JSF. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > My colleague and I are very interested in implementing this > JSR in > >> > > > > Apache Commons Validator, but seems that the project is not > active for > >> > > > > a while, so I am asking how our changes are going to be > applied to > >> > > > > Commons Validator. I mean are we going to submit changes in > patches > >> > > > > and someone will review and commit - but no one is active > now to do > >> > > > > that. Or I can get a committer access to apply changes and > review > >> > > > > patches submitted by my colleague. Please advice and help. > >> > > > > >> > > > Do you have an idea how you want to do this in Commons > Validator? > >> > > > Specifically I'm wondering whether this would be a re-write or > whether > >> > > > you think the exisiting framework could be adapated to JSR 303? > My > >> > > > thinking was that implementing JSR 303 would involved and > >> > > > brand-new-replacement for the existing framework - Validator2. > >> > > > > >> > > > Niall > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > P.S. I need your reply ASAP to stat planning and > coordination with my colleague. > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
