Hi Simon... Thanks very much for your clarification and help :D .
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mohammed, > > To clarify, the process Niall recommended is as follows: > > (1) > You send an email in a separate thread, requesting sandbox commit rights > for yourself and the other initial committer. > > Provide your apache ids of course. > > It might be nice to provide links to show some evidence of your > committer access, eg links to the "developers" lists for the projects > you currently are committers for. > > Also provide a very brief summary of what you intend to do in the > sandbox, for people who have not read this thread. > > (2) > After a couple of days, assuming there are no objections to this > proposal, Niall (or someone else) will copy validator trunk into the > sandbox. > > (3) > Hopefully your sandbox commit rights will also be done by then and you > can get started. > > Of course, you can also use the next few days to start a design > discussion on this list, or create some wiki pages for architectural > discussion, links to the relevant projects, etc. > > I'm happy to help with getting this project started if needed (I'm also > a MyFaces committer). > > > > Regards, > Simon > > Mohammad Nour El-Din schrieb: > > And u did it :( ??? > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Niall Pemberton > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > >> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Thanks Niall a lot. One last question for the sandbox project - if > >>> > >> > approved - can I help you in creating whatever required for that > >> > project, I just want to learn how these things are made :), I mean > >> > steap related to creating new projects and so . > >> > >> Acutally, I think if you get Karma then you can do it yourself - I was > >> just going to create a validator2 directory here: > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/ > >> > >> and then copy the validator trunk. > >> > >> > >> > >> Niall > >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Niall Pemberton > >> > > >> > > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > >> > > > >> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi simon... > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks a lot :), but I like the idea of Naill, that is make a > >> > > > sandbox project for Validator2, so I can work away from the > release > >> > > > process of the current implementation of validator - > Validator1, and > >> > > > when I have a working thing, we can get it out of sandbox to > commons > >> > > > proper as part of the main Validator project, so people can > have 2 > >> > > > falvours of Validator either 1/2. What do you think Naill ?? > >> > > > >> > > Yes I'm happy with that. I'll leave it a couple of days, to give > other > >> > > people a chance to give opnions - but if there are no > objections/other > >> > > proposals then I'll go ahead and set that up in the Sandbox. For > >> > > sandbox access I think its just a case of pinging the list > (probably > >> > > best in another thread, as it might get missed in this one) to ask > for > >> > > Sandbox karma for yourself and your MyFaces colleague. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Niall > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > Hi Mohammed, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > One of the purposes of the commons project is to pool the > work of other > >> > > > > commons projects, ie extract bits out of other projects that > can be more > >> > > > > widely applied. Therefore, the commons project is pretty > open to > >> > > > > existing committers on other Apache projects getting commit > access to > >> > > > > commons. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > As long as the PMC/existing validator developers are happy > with the > >> > > > > general idea, I think it likely that you (and any other > interested > >> > > > > apache committers) would just be granted commit access to > apply changes > >> > > > > yourself. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Regards, > >> > > > > Simon > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Mohammad Nour El-Din schrieb: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Sorry for the last stupid question I could have know it > from site, but > >> > > > > > one more - I hope not stupid - question, you will apply > the Validator2 > >> > > > > > code in trunk and make old validator in a separate branch > ??? > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Niall Pemberton > >> > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> Just to make sure, this is where trunk code exist > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/trunk/ > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> Yes > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> Niall > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > I skimmed over the JSR - not a detailed look > actually - and through > >> > > > > >> > > using annotations you declare the validator class, > so we can adapt the > >> > > > > >> > > current validators, or at least make minor changes > to make them > >> > > > > >> > > suitable to be used through JSR#303/Validator2 > impl. I will download > >> > > > > >> > > the code today and take a more detailed look at > JSR PDF and if I found > >> > > > > >> > > more info I will send them back by the end of this > week. > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Niall Pemberton > >> > > > > >> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Mohammad Nour > El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi All... > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Recently an EDR JSR#303 has been published > on JCP - > >> > > > > >> > > > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 . They > intend to make a unified > >> > > > > >> > > > > Bean Validation APIs/Framework based on > using annotations and XML > >> > > > > >> > > > > configuration files, and they define the way > how to apply and use > >> > > > > >> > > > > validation, and it will be part of the Java > Beans model. > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > I am a committer in Apache OpenEJB, and we > need such functionality for > >> > > > > >> > > > > bean validation through the process of > deploying an enterprise java > >> > > > > >> > > > > bean - we have a home made validation > framework now. And I have a > >> > > > > >> > > > > colleague of mine who is working in Apache > MyFaces Tomahawk- > >> > > > > >> > > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/index.html - and he is interested > >> > > > > >> > > > > in such functionality to apply validation > regarding JSF. > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > My colleague and I are very interested in > implementing this JSR in > >> > > > > >> > > > > Apache Commons Validator, but seems that the > project is not active for > >> > > > > >> > > > > a while, so I am asking how our changes are > going to be applied to > >> > > > > >> > > > > Commons Validator. I mean are we going to > submit changes in patches > >> > > > > >> > > > > and someone will review and commit - but no > one is active now to do > >> > > > > >> > > > > that. Or I can get a committer access to > apply changes and review > >> > > > > >> > > > > patches submitted by my colleague. Please > advice and help. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Do you have an idea how you want to do this in > Commons Validator? > >> > > > > >> > > > Specifically I'm wondering whether this would > be a re-write or whether > >> > > > > >> > > > you think the exisiting framework could be > adapated to JSR 303? My > >> > > > > >> > > > thinking was that implementing JSR 303 would > involved and > >> > > > > >> > > > brand-new-replacement for the existing > framework - Validator2. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Niall > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > P.S. I need your reply ASAP to stat planning > and coordination with my colleague. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Thanks > >> > > > - Mohammad Nour > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Thanks > >> > - Mohammad Nour > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
