And u did it :( ??? On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks Niall a lot. One last question for the sandbox project - if > > approved - can I help you in creating whatever required for that > > project, I just want to learn how these things are made :), I mean > > steap related to creating new projects and so . > > Acutally, I think if you get Karma then you can do it yourself - I was > just going to create a validator2 directory here: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/ > > and then copy the validator trunk. > > > > Niall > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Niall Pemberton > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi simon... > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot :), but I like the idea of Naill, that is make a > > > > sandbox project for Validator2, so I can work away from the release > > > > process of the current implementation of validator - Validator1, and > > > > when I have a working thing, we can get it out of sandbox to commons > > > > proper as part of the main Validator project, so people can have 2 > > > > falvours of Validator either 1/2. What do you think Naill ?? > > > > > > Yes I'm happy with that. I'll leave it a couple of days, to give other > > > people a chance to give opnions - but if there are no objections/other > > > proposals then I'll go ahead and set that up in the Sandbox. For > > > sandbox access I think its just a case of pinging the list (probably > > > best in another thread, as it might get missed in this one) to ask for > > > Sandbox karma for yourself and your MyFaces colleague. > > > > > > > > > > > > Niall > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Mohammed, > > > > > > > > > > One of the purposes of the commons project is to pool the work > of other > > > > > commons projects, ie extract bits out of other projects that can > be more > > > > > widely applied. Therefore, the commons project is pretty open to > > > > > existing committers on other Apache projects getting commit > access to > > > > > commons. > > > > > > > > > > As long as the PMC/existing validator developers are happy with > the > > > > > general idea, I think it likely that you (and any other > interested > > > > > apache committers) would just be granted commit access to apply > changes > > > > > yourself. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > Mohammad Nour El-Din schrieb: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the last stupid question I could have know it from > site, but > > > > > > one more - I hope not stupid - question, you will apply the > Validator2 > > > > > > code in trunk and make old validator in a separate branch ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Niall Pemberton > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > > > > >> > > > > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Just to make sure, this is where trunk code exist > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/trunk/ > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Yes > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Niall > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > I skimmed over the JSR - not a detailed look actually - > and through > > > > > >> > > using annotations you declare the validator class, so > we can adapt the > > > > > >> > > current validators, or at least make minor changes to > make them > > > > > >> > > suitable to be used through JSR#303/Validator2 impl. I > will download > > > > > >> > > the code today and take a more detailed look at JSR > PDF and if I found > > > > > >> > > more info I will send them back by the end of this > week. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Niall Pemberton > > > > > >> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Mohammad Nour > El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > Hi All... > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Recently an EDR JSR#303 has been published on > JCP - > > > > > >> > > > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 . They > intend to make a unified > > > > > >> > > > > Bean Validation APIs/Framework based on using > annotations and XML > > > > > >> > > > > configuration files, and they define the way how > to apply and use > > > > > >> > > > > validation, and it will be part of the Java > Beans model. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I am a committer in Apache OpenEJB, and we need > such functionality for > > > > > >> > > > > bean validation through the process of deploying > an enterprise java > > > > > >> > > > > bean - we have a home made validation framework > now. And I have a > > > > > >> > > > > colleague of mine who is working in Apache > MyFaces Tomahawk- > > > > > >> > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/index.html - > and he is interested > > > > > >> > > > > in such functionality to apply validation > regarding JSF. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > My colleague and I are very interested in > implementing this JSR in > > > > > >> > > > > Apache Commons Validator, but seems that the > project is not active for > > > > > >> > > > > a while, so I am asking how our changes are > going to be applied to > > > > > >> > > > > Commons Validator. I mean are we going to submit > changes in patches > > > > > >> > > > > and someone will review and commit - but no one > is active now to do > > > > > >> > > > > that. Or I can get a committer access to apply > changes and review > > > > > >> > > > > patches submitted by my colleague. Please advice > and help. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Do you have an idea how you want to do this in > Commons Validator? > > > > > >> > > > Specifically I'm wondering whether this would be a > re-write or whether > > > > > >> > > > you think the exisiting framework could be adapated > to JSR 303? My > > > > > >> > > > thinking was that implementing JSR 303 would > involved and > > > > > >> > > > brand-new-replacement for the existing framework - > Validator2. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Niall > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > P.S. I need your reply ASAP to stat planning and > coordination with my colleague. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks > > > > - Mohammad Nour > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks > > - Mohammad Nour > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Thanks - Mohammad Nour --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
