Bug#219937: WINGS

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux Date: Mon Nov 10 10:42:33 EET 2003 Method: How did you ins

Unknown local-part

Hi All I have installed a Woody box with Mutt/Fetchmail/Exim configured. I can send and receive mails out side without any problem (any one out side my domain). But when I try to mail another person who is in my own domain (unionb.com), I get this error back, A message that you se

kernel-image-2.6.0-test9 doesn't support usb keyboard

Hi, I've tried the latest 2.6.0 package on my box which uses a usb keyboard and mouse. The kernel seems to boot fine without error but the keyboard or mouse refuse to work. I've had the same problem with a stock kernel compiled from sources - is this a known problem or is this a new development?

Bug#220014: installation-reports: Installation report (beta-1): DHCP, drives problems

Package: installation-reports Version: 2003-11-10 Severity: normal Tags: d-i INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-10 (beta-1) uname -a: "Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-i386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux" Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:10:00 +0100 Method: How did you install? Wha

Bug#220014: installation-reports: Installation report (beta-1): DHCP, drives problems

Sebastien Bacher wrote: > * displaying the devfs path for a drive ... how an user can handle that ? You should > have "MBR on boot disk" and "Others disk" choices ... > > * the ide-scsi/fstab bug create a sort of loop ... no way to quit in a correct way > (just hit ctrl+C several times ...), no

Bug#220023: installation-reports: install report: manual mirror selection fails

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal File: installation-reports -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Debian-installer-version: "debian-installer and doc only, requires net access (50MB)" retrieved from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ this morning uname -a: Linux l

Bug#220014: I had the same problem with /dev/sr0 vs. /dev/hdc

I'm using the 100MB netinst boot CD, from 2003/11/9. (The first part of the install (booted from the CD) went fine, installing to what's normally the swap partition on that hard drive :). I told it to have LILO install a bootloader onto the partition, not the whole drive, and added a GRUB menu

Bug#220048: d-i report: netinst cd does not boot, no floppy images

Package: installation-reports Version: 2003-11-10 Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-10, http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux donald 2.6.0-test9 #1 Tue Oct 28 19:40:11 CET 2003 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2003, Nov 10

Bug#220023: marked as done (installation-reports: install report: manual mirror selection fails)

Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2003 23:21:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Your installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Re: Unknown local-part

[I don't think this is the list we really want to be discussing this on. Might move it to -user soon, if that's OK] On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:32:17PM +0600, Pradeeper wrote: > I have installed a Woody box with Mutt/Fetchmail/Exim configured. > I can send and receive mails out side without any pr

Bug#220117: Installation report

Package: installation-reports Priority: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso (9 nov 2003 16:43) uname -a: vmlinuz-2.4.22-1-386 (can't run uname -a, already booted back to my normal Debia

Processed: sorting installation reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 219911 -1 Bug#219911: Installation report Bug 219911 cloned as bug 220113. > clone 219903 -2 Bug#219903: Installation report Bug 219903 cloned as bug 220114. > reassign -1 discover-data-udeb Bug#220113: Installation report Bug reassigned from pa

Bug#219911: marked as done (Installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:36:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line thanks for your installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#219903: marked as done (Installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:36:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line thanks for your installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#220132: install successful, but many oddities

Package: installation-reports Version: debian-installer beta-1 (Nov 10, 2003) Severity: normal Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Nov 10, 2003 (beta-1) from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux

Bug#219777: marked as done (Succesfull Installation)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:12:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#219525: marked as done (installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" failed)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:22:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Re: Unknown local-part

Hi Matthew On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:44:20AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > "viraja" is another email address of my domain. What could be the > > problem?I have attached mainlog and exim.conf as well. > > Does the user 'viraja' exist on the machine you've installed exim on? Is > there an entr

Bug#172954: marked as done (Network installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Re: Unknown local-part

Pradeeper writes: > Hi Matthew > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:44:20AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > "viraja" is another email address of my domain. What could be the > > > problem?I have attached mainlog and exim.conf as well. > > > > Does the user 'viraja' exist on the machine you've

Bug#173649: marked as done (installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172192: marked as done (kernel modules can't be loaded)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#186283: marked as done (netinst cd problems (march24th sarge image))

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172242: marked as done (installation-reports: library missing?)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172193: marked as done (pump fails)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#204299: marked as done (installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#175461: marked as done (INSTALL REPORT)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172244: marked as done (Problem using ext3)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#175461: Message Rejected: $SUBJECT

\nYour message was bounced by the\nrecipient's mail server\nThe Recipient account on this server is canceled.\n -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#173721: marked as done (installation-reports: Network installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172405: marked as done (console-fonts_2002.12.04dbs-1_all.udeb: applet not found)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172338: marked as done (ne2k-pci.o: Module not found (and unresolved symbols))

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#179428: marked as done (installation-reports: tries to fetch Packages file from http:///debian/dists/... ; choose-mirror not offered)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#196293: marked as done (installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04))

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172427: marked as done (debian-installer does not load console-fonts udeb)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172266: marked as done (debian-installer: CD install, can't find module natsemi)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#212774: marked as done (d-i report: problems with part conf, boot loader and a bunch of small things)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:27 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172952: marked as done (Network installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:27 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172247: marked as done (installation-reports: Selecting netcfg-dhcp should automatically select pump-udeb)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Re: Unknown local-part

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:49:59PM -0500, Jeff Sheinberg wrote: > This is an exim config problem, and should be discussed on > debian-user or exim-users, not here on debian testing. Sorry about that... > Here is the problem, it is a cheap form of address masquerading, > you are telling exim that u

Re: Unknown local-part

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:23:37PM +0600, Pradeeper wrote: > > > > If you want to try qmail, email me, and I will send you my config. > Yes I want to try Qmail but it's not a package of Debian, isn't it? I > think there's a site where you can apt-get it to debain.Please send the > config and entri

Re: Unknown local-part

[Don't Cc: me, as per Debian list policy] On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:13:40PM +0600, Pradeeper wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:44:20AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > "viraja" is another email address of my domain. What could be the > > > problem?I have attached mainlog and exim.conf as well

Bug#220160: installation-reports: cfdisk in endless loop

Package: installation-reports Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Installation on a Toshiba Satellite 4010CTD 64 mb ram, pII 266, 4 gb ide hd, ide cdrom. Used boot floppies from sid. (kerne

Bug#220163: installation-reports: netboot install attempt via PXE

Package: installation-reports Version: netboot daily image from 2003-11-10 Severity: normal Tags: d-i INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: daily netboot image from uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i6

Processed: Your installation report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 220048 installation Bug#220048: d-i report: netinst cd does not boot, no floppy images Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation'. > retitle 220048 Cannot boot from CD Bug#220048: d-i report: netinst cd does not boot,

Processed: Your installation report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 219937 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 Bug#219937: WINGS Bug 219937 cloned as bugs 220118-220126. > reassign -1 partitioner Bug#220118: WINGS Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partitioner'. > retitle -1 partitioner: should integr

Processed: sorting installation bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 219777 -1 -2 -3 Bug#219777: Succesfull Installation Bug 219777 cloned as bugs 220127-220129. > reassign -1 choose-mirror Bug#220127: Succesfull Installation Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `choose-mirror'. > retitle -1 plea

Processed: Your installation report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 219613 -1 -2 Bug#219613: installation-reports: 4 Nov 2003: reiserfs really hard to get; maybe grub issue; interface glitch Bug 219613 cloned as bugs 220130-220131. > reassign -1 grub-installer Bug#220130: installation-reports: 4 Nov 2003: reiser

Processed: sorting installer bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 219525 -1 -2 -3 Bug#219525: installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" failed Bug 219525 cloned as bugs 220135-220137. > reassign -1 netcfg Bug#220135: installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" fai

Processed: Reassign

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 219375 hw-detect Bug#219375: installation-reports - Hard drive not detected Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `hw-detect'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Bug#219911: Installation report

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-09, www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 unknown Date: 2003-11-09 8:30 PM PST Method: Net install CD Machine: Digital PC 3000 P

Bug#219937: WINGS

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux Date: Mon Nov 10 10:42:33 EET 2003 Method: How did you in

Unknown local-part

Hi All I have installed a Woody box with Mutt/Fetchmail/Exim configured. I can send and receive mails out side without any problem (any one out side my domain). But when I try to mail another person who is in my own domain (unionb.com), I get this error back, A message that you se

kernel-image-2.6.0-test9 doesn't support usb keyboard

Hi, I've tried the latest 2.6.0 package on my box which uses a usb keyboard and mouse. The kernel seems to boot fine without error but the keyboard or mouse refuse to work. I've had the same problem with a stock kernel compiled from sources - is this a known problem or is this a new development?

Bug#220014: installation-reports: Installation report (beta-1): DHCP, drives problems

Package: installation-reports Version: 2003-11-10 Severity: normal Tags: d-i INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-10 (beta-1) uname -a: "Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-i386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux" Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:10:00 +0100 Method: How did you install? Wh

Bug#220014: installation-reports: Installation report (beta-1): DHCP, drives problems

Sebastien Bacher wrote: > * displaying the devfs path for a drive ... how an user can handle that ? You > should > have "MBR on boot disk" and "Others disk" choices ... > > * the ide-scsi/fstab bug create a sort of loop ... no way to quit in a > correct way > (just hit ctrl+C several times ...

Bug#220023: installation-reports: install report: manual mirror selection fails

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal File: installation-reports -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Debian-installer-version: "debian-installer and doc only, requires net access (50MB)" retrieved from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ this morning uname -a: Linux

Bug#220014: I had the same problem with /dev/sr0 vs. /dev/hdc

I'm using the 100MB netinst boot CD, from 2003/11/9. (The first part of the install (booted from the CD) went fine, installing to what's normally the swap partition on that hard drive :). I told it to have LILO install a bootloader onto the partition, not the whole drive, and added a GRUB menu

Bug#220048: d-i report: netinst cd does not boot, no floppy images

Package: installation-reports Version: 2003-11-10 Severity: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-10, http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux donald 2.6.0-test9 #1 Tue Oct 28 19:40:11 CET 2003 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2003, Nov 1

Bug#220023: marked as done (installation-reports: install report: manual mirror selection fails)

Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2003 23:21:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Your installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Re: Unknown local-part

[I don't think this is the list we really want to be discussing this on. Might move it to -user soon, if that's OK] On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:32:17PM +0600, Pradeeper wrote: > I have installed a Woody box with Mutt/Fetchmail/Exim configured. > I can send and receive mails out side without any pr

Processed: Your installation report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 220048 installation Bug#220048: d-i report: netinst cd does not boot, no floppy images Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation'. > retitle 220048 Cannot boot from CD Bug#220048: d-i report: netinst cd does not boot,

Bug#220117: Installation report

Package: installation-reports Priority: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso (9 nov 2003 16:43) uname -a: vmlinuz-2.4.22-1-386 (can't run uname -a, already booted back to my normal Debia

Processed: sorting installation reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 219911 -1 Bug#219911: Installation report Bug 219911 cloned as bug 220113. > clone 219903 -2 Bug#219903: Installation report Bug 219903 cloned as bug 220114. > reassign -1 discover-data-udeb Bug#220113: Installation report Bug reassigned from pa

Bug#219911: marked as done (Installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:36:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line thanks for your installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#219903: marked as done (Installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 01:36:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line thanks for your installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#220132: install successful, but many oddities

Package: installation-reports Version: debian-installer beta-1 (Nov 10, 2003) Severity: normal Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Nov 10, 2003 (beta-1) from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux

Processed: Your installation report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 219937 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 Bug#219937: WINGS Bug 219937 cloned as bugs 220118-220126. > reassign -1 partitioner Bug#220118: WINGS Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partitioner'. > retitle -1 partitioner: should integr

Processed: sorting installation bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 219777 -1 -2 -3 Bug#219777: Succesfull Installation Bug 219777 cloned as bugs 220127-220129. > reassign -1 choose-mirror Bug#220127: Succesfull Installation Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `choose-mirror'. > retitle -1 plea

Processed: Your installation report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 219613 -1 -2 Bug#219613: installation-reports: 4 Nov 2003: reiserfs really hard to get; maybe grub issue; interface glitch Bug 219613 cloned as bugs 220130-220131. > reassign -1 grub-installer Bug#220130: installation-reports: 4 Nov 2003: reiser

Processed: sorting installer bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 219525 -1 -2 -3 Bug#219525: installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" failed Bug 219525 cloned as bugs 220135-220137. > reassign -1 netcfg Bug#220135: installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" f

Processed: Reassign

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 219375 hw-detect Bug#219375: installation-reports - Hard drive not detected Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `hw-detect'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Bug#219777: marked as done (Succesfull Installation)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:12:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#219525: marked as done (installation-reports: installation report: "configure the network" failed)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:22:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing installation report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Re: Unknown local-part

Hi Matthew On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:44:20AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > "viraja" is another email address of my domain. What could be the > > problem?I have attached mainlog and exim.conf as well. > > Does the user 'viraja' exist on the machine you've installed exim on? Is > there an entr

Bug#172954: marked as done (Network installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Re: Unknown local-part

Pradeeper writes: > Hi Matthew > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:44:20AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > "viraja" is another email address of my domain. What could be the > > > problem?I have attached mainlog and exim.conf as well. > > > > Does the user 'viraja' exist on the machine you've

Bug#173649: marked as done (installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172192: marked as done (kernel modules can't be loaded)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#186283: marked as done (netinst cd problems (march24th sarge image))

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172242: marked as done (installation-reports: library missing?)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172193: marked as done (pump fails)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#204299: marked as done (installation-reports: Installation report, 5 Aug 2003)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#175461: marked as done (INSTALL REPORT)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172244: marked as done (Problem using ext3)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#175461: Message Rejected: $SUBJECT

\nYour message was bounced by the\nrecipient's mail server\nThe Recipient account on this server is canceled.\n

Bug#173721: marked as done (installation-reports: Network installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172405: marked as done (console-fonts_2002.12.04dbs-1_all.udeb: applet not found)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172338: marked as done (ne2k-pci.o: Module not found (and unresolved symbols))

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#179428: marked as done (installation-reports: tries to fetch Packages file from http:///debian/dists/... ; choose-mirror not offered)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:21:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#196293: marked as done (installation-reports: trying debian-installer (2003-06-04))

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:20:25 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172427: marked as done (debian-installer does not load console-fonts udeb)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172266: marked as done (debian-installer: CD install, can't find module natsemi)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#212774: marked as done (d-i report: problems with part conf, boot loader and a bunch of small things)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:27 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172952: marked as done (Network installation report)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:27 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#172247: marked as done (installation-reports: Selecting netcfg-dhcp should automatically select pump-udeb)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing old installation reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Re: Unknown local-part

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:49:59PM -0500, Jeff Sheinberg wrote: > This is an exim config problem, and should be discussed on > debian-user or exim-users, not here on debian testing. Sorry about that... > Here is the problem, it is a cheap form of address masquerading, > you are telling exim that u

Re: Unknown local-part

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:23:37PM +0600, Pradeeper wrote: > > > > If you want to try qmail, email me, and I will send you my config. > Yes I want to try Qmail but it's not a package of Debian, isn't it? I > think there's a site where you can apt-get it to debain.Please send the > config and entri

Re: Unknown local-part

[Don't Cc: me, as per Debian list policy] On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:13:40PM +0600, Pradeeper wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:44:20AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > "viraja" is another email address of my domain. What could be the > > > problem?I have attached mainlog and exim.conf as well