Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old installation reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2002 18:24:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 08 12:24:40 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.pewtersystems.pdr.me.uk (reggie) [81.2.75.98]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18L66Y-0003mA-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 12:24:38 -0600
Received: from pdr by reggie with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18L65j-0000Wa-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 18:23:47 +0000
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 18:23:47 +0000
From: Pete Ryland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem using ext3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-GPG-Key: 1024D/B50141E3
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 4F7B 42B9 5B82 B190 0DD2 E8AC 5288 7F20 B501 41E3
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.19 i686
X-Jabber-ID: pdr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~tfheen/d-i/images/2002-12-07/cvs/net-1440.img
5839ab97f1373a7f6789dcbf733257d2 net-1440.img
uname -a: N/A
Install Date: about Sun Dec 8 16:00:00 GMT 2002
Method: Boot off floppy with above image. Network install from
www.mirror.ac.uk. No proxy.
Machine: PC, 3 IDE HDDs, no CD.
Processor: PIII/600MHz
Memory: 256MB
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table:
/dev/hda: 5G total
/dev/hda1: target /
/dev/hda5: target swap
/dev/hda5: target /usr
/dev/hda6: target /var
/dev/hda7: target /tmp
/dev/hdc: 17G total
/dev/hdc1: N/A (previously used for playing with debootstrap)
/dev/hdc6: N/A (currently unused swap)
/dev/hdc7: /home (ext3) (will be manually grafted onto new install)
/dev/hdd: 120G total
/dev/hdd1: data (ext3) (will be manually grafted onto new install)
Output of lspci:
Hopefully N/A.
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [E]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
My system has 2 realteks. I wasn't phased by needing to manually select the
module, but it will be nice when it works perfectly.
'Load installer modules' would be confusing to a newbie. IMO, this should
be made simpler to understand - maybe even removed. I didn't need any
modules anyway. :)
I was able to partition my drives to ext3 and mount them, but what I failed
to realise for a bit was that they weren't actually mounted since ext3
wasn't in the kernel and wasn't there as a module. HOWEVER, the
installation still proceeded to install without having the devices mounted!
It obviously ended up running out of space. In case this ever crops up
again, the error I ended up seeing was something like: "[: Missing ']' on
line 72." when trying to install LILO, but the root cause was that it was
trying to install to the ramdisk and was running out of space.
Another thing is that I didn't need to look for a cdrom, but it kept making
that the default option, even when I was up to the later stages of the
install. Otherwise the default options were nicely done.
Anyway, it has worked with ext2 now, and it's just booted nicely into my new
install. :) You forgot to tell me to take the floppy out though! :)
Best regards, and thanks,
Pete
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 172244-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2003 01:20:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 10 19:19:56 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from trofast.sesse.net [129.241.93.32]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AJNCG-0003vb-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:19:56 -0600
Received: from root by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AJNCF-0006N3-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:19:55 +0100
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing old installation reports
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.23-pre9 on a i686
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_90
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
(This is my third attempt at sending this mail, and they keep getting eaten.
I'll split now and hope it gets through. :-) )
I'm closing a bunch of old installation reports that do not appear to be
related to the current state of the installer (ie. report problems that has
been fixed now; some of these should have been closed ages ago, but never
was). Feel free to test the d-i beta and submit new installation reports :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
