Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old installation reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2002 19:27:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 08 13:27:45 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from out001pub.verizon.net (out001.verizon.net) [206.46.170.140]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18L75d-0001vB-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 13:27:45 -0600
Received: from cerebus ([209.158.26.57]) by out001.verizon.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.20 201-253-122-126-120-20021101) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sun, 8 Dec 2002 13:27:14 -0600
Received: from [192.168.1.15] (helo=torrent)
by cerebus with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18L758-0004A2-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 14:27:14 -0500
Received: from daniel by torrent with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18L757-0004uK-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 14:27:13 -0500
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 14:27:13 -0500
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: installation-reports: Selecting netcfg-dhcp should automatically
select pump-udeb
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.9
Sender: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at out001.verizon.net
from [209.158.26.57] at Sun, 8 Dec 2002 13:27:14 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0
tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-08
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/local-di-sarge.iso
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.19-386 #1 Mon Nov 18 21:50:03 2002 i686 unknown
Date: 2:10 December 8th
Method: Booted the CD image in bochs and ran through the first few steps.
Machine: bochs
Processor: N/A
Memory: 32MB
Root Device: hdimage
Root Size/partition table: 504 MB, no partitions yet
Output of lspci: /bin/sh: lspci: not found (it must not be included on
the initrd)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [X]
Configure network HW: [ ]
Config network: [ ]
Detect CD: [X]
Load installer modules: [X]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives: [ ]
Create file systems: [ ]
Mount partitions: [ ]
Install base system: [ ]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
There is clearly a dependency structure between the options presented at
the "Load Installer Modules" step. The user shouldn't have to infer it
beforehand; if an option is selected, its dependencies should also be
selected.
For instance: if the user selects option 2,
"Configure the network via DHCP", the following message appears:
"No dhcp client found. I cannot continue. This package requires
pump or dhcp-client"
The program should have automatically installed option 8, "Simple
DHCP/BOOTP client for debian-installer".
Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux torrent.burrows.local 2.4.20 #1 Sun Dec 1 11:55:31 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set)
--
/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------\
| Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology. |
\------- (if (not (understand-this)) (go-to http://www.schemers.org)) --------/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 172247-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2003 01:55:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 10 19:55:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from trofast.sesse.net [129.241.93.32]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AJNkN-00041H-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:55:11 -0600
Received: from root by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AJNkM-0006VQ-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:10 +0100
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:55:09 +0100
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing old installation reports
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.23-pre9 on a i686
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
(Last split, hope the last ones finally go through this time. Note to self:
BTS seems to eat everything with five addresses or more, unconditionally...)
I'm closing a bunch of old installation reports that do not appear to be
related to the current state of the installer (ie. report problems that has
been fixed now; some of these should have been closed ages ago, but never
was). Feel free to test the d-i beta and submit new installation reports :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
